On the history of if- and though-links with declarative complement clauses

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 93-107

  López Couso, María José ^a   Méndez Naya, Belén ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248730621     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s1360674301000144     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barber, C. (1976). Early modern English. London: André Deutsch.
2. Bender, E. & D. Flickinger (1999). Diachronic evidence for extended argument structure. In Bouma, G., E. Hinrichs, G. M. Kruijff & R. Oehrle (eds.), Constraints and resources in natural language syntax and semantics. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. 3-19.
3. Burnham, J. M. (1911). Concessive constructions in Old English prose. Yale Studies in English 39.
4. Cristofaro, S. (1998). Grammaticalization and clause linkage strategies: a typological approach with particular reference to Ancient Greek. In Ramat, A. G. & P. J. Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 59-88.
5. Denison, D. (1998). Syntax. In Romaine, S. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 4, 1776-1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 92-329.
6. Elsness, J. (1981). On the syntactic and semantic functions of that-clauses. In Johansson, S. & B. Tysdhal (eds.), Papers from the first Nordic conference for English studies. Oslo: University of Oslo. 281-303.
7. Elsness, J. (1982). That v. zero connective in English nominal clauses. ICAME News 6: 1-45.
8. Elsness, J. (1984). That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English. English Studies 65: 519-33.
9. Ernout, A. & F. Thomas (1951). Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.
10. Fanego, T. (1990). Finite complement clauses in Shakespeare's English I & II. Studia Neophilologica 62: 3-21 and 129-49.
11. Fanego, T. (1992). Infinitive complements in Shakespeare's English: synchronic and diachronic aspects. Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico.
12. Finegan, E. & D. Biber (1995). That and zero complementisers in late modern English: exploring ARCHER from 1650-1990. In Aarts, B. & C. F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English: theory and description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 241-57.
13. Fischer, O. (1992). Syntax. In Blake, N. F. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 2, 1066-1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 207-408.
14. Haiman, J. (1978). Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564-89.
15. Harris, M. B. (1986). The historical development of si-clauses in Romance. In Traugott, E. C., A. ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reilly & C. A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 265-84.
16. Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Huddleston, R. (1971). The sentence in written English: a syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Jespersen, O. (1917). Negation in English and other languages. (De Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I, 5.) Copenhagen.
20. [Reprinted in 1962 in Selected writings of Otto Jespersen, London: Allen & Unwin. 1-151.]
21. Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. & J. J. Katz (eds.), The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 246-323.
22. Lakoff, R. (1968). Abstract syntax and Latin complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Lehmann, C. (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Haiman, J. & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 181-225.
24. López-Couso, M. J. (1994). Finite complementation in the works of John Dryden: a corpus-based study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela.
25. López-Couso, M. J. (1996). That/zero variation in Restoration English. In Britton, D. (ed.), English historical linguistics 1994 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 135). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 271-86.
26. López-Couso, M. J. & B. Méndez-Naya (1996). How to consider how: on how as a declarative complementiser in the history of English. In Pérez-Guerra, J. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the XIX international conference of the Spanish association for English and American studies (AEDEAN). Vigo: Universidade de Vigo. 347-52.
27. López-Couso, M. J. & B. Méndez-Naya (1998). On minor declarative complementisers in the history of English: the case of but. In Fisiak, J. & M. Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton. 161-71.
28. Mair, C. (1990). Infinitival complement clauses in English: a study of grammar in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Markus, M. (1988). Middle English and eModE letters as the basis of a linguistic corpus. In Markus, M. (ed.), Historical English: on the occasion of Karl Brunner's 100th birthday. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kultur-Wissenschaft. 167-85.
30. Matthews, P. H. (1981). Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. McCawley, J. D. (1988). The syntactic phenomena of English, 2 vols. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
32. McDavid, V. (1964). The alternation of that and zero in noun clauses. American Speech 39: 102-13.
33. MED = Kurath, H. et al. (eds.) (1952-). Middle English dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34. Méndez-Naya, B. (1995). Finite complementation in Old English: a corpus-based study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela.
35. Mitchell, B. (1985). Old English syntax, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36. Nevalainen, T. et al. (compilers) (1998). Corpus of early English correspondence sampler. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
37. Noonan, M. (1985). Complementation. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vol. 2, 42-140.
38. OED = Murray, J. A. H. H. Bradley, W. A. Craigie & C. T. Onions (eds.) (1933). The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Pérez-Guerra, J. (1999). Historical English syntax: a statistical corpus-based study on the organisation of early modern English sentences. Munich: Lincom Europa.
40. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.
41. Rissanen, M. (1986). Variation and the study of English historical syntax. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Diversity and diachrony (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 53). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 97-109.
42. Rissanen, M. (1991). On the history of that/zero as object clause links in English. In Aijmer, K. & B. Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: studies in honour of Jan Svartvik. London and New York: Longman. 272-89.
43. Rissanen, M. (1999). Syntax. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 3, 1476-1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 187-331.
44. Rissanen, M., O. Ihalainen & M. Kytö (compilers) (1991). Helsinki corpus of English texts: diachronic and dialectal. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
45. Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
46. Traugott, E. C. (1985). On conditionals. In Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 289-307.
47. Traugott, E. C. (1992). Syntax. In Hogg, R. M. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1, The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168-289.
48. Visser, F. Th. (1963-73). An historical syntax of the English language, I-III. Leiden: Brill.
49. Warner, A. (1982). Complementation and the methodology of historical syntax. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.