Locally free self-forms, logophoricity, and intensification in English

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 183-204

  König, Ekkehard ^a   Siemund, Peter ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248726204     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674300000228     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AF Airframe, by Michael Crichton. Arrow Books, 1996.
2. AFI A Fatal Inversion, by Barbara Vine (Ruth Rendell). Penguin, 1987.
3. BNC The British National Corpus.
4. Brown The Brown Corpus.
5. CP Changing Places, by David Lodge. Penguin, 1975.
6. LOLAC The Longman-Lancaster Corpus.
7. Paradise News, by David Lodge. Penguin, 1991.
8. The complete poems of Emily Dickinson, ed. Thomas H. Johnson. Toronto: Little, Brown & Company, 1960.
9. Therapy, by David Lodge. Penguin 1995.
10. Well-Schooled in Murder, by Elizabeth George. Bantam Press, 1990.
11. Baker, C. L. (1995). Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71: 63-101.
12. Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13. Brinton, L. L. (1995). Non-anaphoric reflexives in free indirect style: expressing the subjectivity of the non-speaker. In Stein, D. & S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173-94.
14. Cantrall, W. R. (1974). Viewpoint, reflexives, and the nature of noun phrases. The Hague: Mouton.
15. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
16. Clements, G. N. (1975). The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141-77.
17. Hagège, C. (1974). Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistiquc de Paris 69:287-310.
18. Keenan, E. L. (1988). Complex anaphors and bind alpha. Chicago Linguistic Society 24: 216-32.
19. Kemmer, S. (1995). Emphatic and reflexive -self expectations, viewpoint, and subjectivity. In Stein, D. & S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectirisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 55-82.
20. Kiss, K. E. (1998). Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245-73.
21. König, E. (1991). The meaning of focus particles: a comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
22. König, E. & P. Siemund (1996a). Emphatische Reflexiva und Fokusstruktur. In Rosengren, I. (ed.), Sprache und Pragnialik 40. Lund: Lunds Universitet. 1-42.
23. König, E. & P. Siemund (1996b). Selbst-Refiektionen. In Harras, G. (ed.), Wenn die Semantik arbeitet. Festschrift für Klaus Baumgärtner. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 277-302.
24. König, E. & P. Siemund (1999). Intensifiers as targets and sources of semantic change. In Koch, P. & A. Blank (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition. Berlin: Mouton. 237-57.
25. König, E. & P. Siemund (2000a). Intensifiers and reflexives: a typological perspective. In Frajzyngier, Z. & T. S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: forms and functions. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
26. König, E. & P. Siemund (2000b). The development of complex reflexives and intensifiers in English. Diachronica 17 : 39-84.
27. Koster, J. & E. Reuland (eds.) (1991). Long-distance anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
29. Levinson, S. C. (1991). Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27: 107-61.
30. Parker, F., K. Riley, & C. F. Meyer (1990). Untriggered reflexive pronouns in English. American Speech 65: 50-69.
31. Pollard, C. & I. A. Sag (1992). Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 261-303.
32. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, & J. Svartvik (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
33. Reinhart, T. & E. Reuland (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 657-720.
34. Roncador, M. von (1988). Zwischen direkter und indirekter Rede. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
35. Ross, J. R. (1970). On declarative sentences. In Jacobs, R. & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co. 222-72.
36. Sells, P. (1987). Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445-79.
37. Siemund, P. (2000). Intensifiers in English and German: a comparison. London: Routledge.
38. Stirling, L. (1993). Switch-reference and discourse representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1989). Anaphor binding and narrative point of view. English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65: 695-727.
40. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1995). Emphatic or reflexive? On the endophoric character of French luimême and similar complex pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 31: 333-74.
41. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1996). Some wondering remarks on the development of syntactic theories: the case of long-distance reflexives. Recherches Linguistiqucs de Vincennes 25: 141-8.