'Modal' that as determiner and pronoun: The primacy of the cognitive-interactive dimension

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 297-315

  Cornish, Francis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248723996     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674301000259     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aoyama, T. (1995). Deixis and value: a semantic analysis of the Japanese demonstratives. In Contini-Morava & Goldberg. 289-320.
2. Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheoric. Jena: Fischer Verlag.
3. Bühler, K. (1982). The deictic field of language and deictic words. Extracts in English from Bühler (1934). In Jarvella & Klein. 12-28.
4. Cheshire, J. (1996). That jacksprat: an interactional perspective on English that. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 369-93.
5. Contini-Morava, E. & B. S. Goldberg (eds.) (1995). Meaning as explanation: advances in linguistic sign theory. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
6. Cornish, F. (1999). Anaphora, discourse, and understanding: evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Ehlich, K. (1982). Anaphora and deixis: same, similar, or different? In Jarvella & Klein. 315-38.
8. Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Le Seuil.
9. Glover, K. (2000). Proximal and distal deixis in negotiation talk. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 915-26.
10. Gundel, J. K., N. Hedberg & R. Zacharski (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274-307.
11. Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Duranti, A. & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 43-76.
12. Himmelmann, N. P. (1996). Demonstratives in narrative discourse: a taxonomy of universal uses. In Fox, B. (ed.), Studies in anaphora. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-54.
13. Janssen, T. A. J. M. (1995). Deixis from a cognitive point of view. In Contini-Morava & Goldberg. 245-70.
14. Jarvella, R. J. & W. Klein (eds.) (1982). Speech, place and action: studies in deixis and related topics. Chichester: John Wiley.
15. Kleiber, G. (1994). Anaphoras et pronoms. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.
16. Kuroda, S-Y. (1985). La sémantique des démonstratifs japonais. Linguisticae Investigationes 9: 69-81.
17. Lakoff, R. (1974). Remarks on this and that. In Proceedings of the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society. 345-56.
18. Lapaire, J-R. & W. Rotgé (1991). Linguistique et grammaire de l'anglais. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
19. Laury, R. (1997). Demonstratives in interaction: the emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20. Leonard, R. A. (1995). Deixis in Swahili: attention meanings and pragmatic function. In Contini-Morava & Goldberg. 271-87.
21. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lyons, J. (1979). Deixis and anaphora. In Myers, T. (ed.), The development of conversation and discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 88-103.
23. Lyons, J. (1982). Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum In Jarvella & Klein. 101-24.
24. Maclaren, R. (1980). On two asymmetrical uses of the demonstrative determiners in English. Linguistics 18: 803-20.
25. Maes, A. (1996). Nominal anaphors, markedness, and the coherence of discourse. Leuven: Peeters.
26. Myers, G. (1988). This and that in discourse anaphora: the ambiguity of references to propositions. Paper presented at the Autumn meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, University of Exeter, 1988.
27. Östman, J-O. (1995). Recasting the deictic foundation, using Physics and Finnish. In Shibatani, M. & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in semantics and pragmatics in honor of Charles J. Fillmore. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 247-78.
28. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Review article: The textual and contextual basis of discourse. Semiotica 102: 101-24.
29. Strauss, S. (1993). Why this and that are not complete without it. In Proceedings of the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: i: The Main Session. Chicago Linguistic Society. 403-17.