메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 642-645

What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?: Commentary on Wunderlich

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 34248711911     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.28.3.13tom     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (33)

References (16)
  • 5
    • 55549121525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fodor, J. 2003. Evaluating models of parameter setting. Handout, LSA Summer Institute.
    • Fodor, J. 2003. "Evaluating models of parameter setting". Handout, LSA Summer Institute.
  • 6
    • 0037159541 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
    • Häuser, M. D.; Chomsky, N.; and Fitch, W. T. 2002. "The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?". Science 298: 1569-1579.
    • (2002) Science , vol.298 , pp. 1569-1579
    • Häuser, M.D.1    Chomsky, N.2    Fitch, W.T.3
  • 7
    • 0037540898 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Optimality and diachronic adaptation
    • Haspelmath, M. 1999. "Optimality and diachronic adaptation". Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2): 180-205.
    • (1999) Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft , vol.18 , Issue.2 , pp. 180-205
    • Haspelmath, M.1
  • 13
    • 54049152174 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments
    • Pullum, G.; and Scholz, B. 2002. "Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments". Linguistic Review 19: 9-50.
    • (2002) Linguistic Review , vol.19 , pp. 9-50
    • Pullum, G.1    Scholz, B.2
  • 15
    • 84922529963 scopus 로고
    • Language is not an instinct
    • Tomasello, M. 1995. "Language is not an instinct". Cognitive development 10: 131-156.
    • (1995) Cognitive development , vol.10 , pp. 131-156
    • Tomasello, M.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.