Variation, stance and style: Word-final-er, high rising tone, and ethnicity in Australian english

English World-Wide

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-42

  Kiesling, Scott F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248710501     PISSN: 01728865     EISSN: 15699730     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/eww.26.1.02kie     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agresti, Alan and Barbara Finlay. 1997. Statistical Methods for Social Sciences. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Benor, Sarah B. 2001. “Sounding learned: The gendered use of /t/ in Orthodox Jewish English”. In Tara Sanchez and Daniel E. Johnson, eds. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 2000. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics, 1-16.
3. Blair, David and Peter Collins, eds. 2000. English in Australia. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
4. Brown, Penelope. 1998. “How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community” In Jennifer Coates, ed. Language and Gender: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 81-99.
5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. “You da man: Narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 443-60.
7. Clyne, Michael. 1991. Community Languages: The Australian Experience. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Clyne, Michael., Edina Eisikovits and Laura Tollfree. 2000. “Ethnic varieties of Australian English”. In Blair and Collins, eds.: 223-38.
9. Cox, Felicity. 1998. “Vowel change in Australian English”. Phonetica 56: 1-27.
10. Curtin, Suzanne and Scott F. Kiesling. 2003. “Adults’ perception of gender in children’s speech”. Presented at the Second International Gender and Language Association Conference, Lancaster, U.K. Also available at http://www.pitt.edu/-kiesling/perception/home.html.
11. Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12. Eckert, Penelope. 2001. “Style and social meaning”. In Eckert and Rickford, eds.: 119-26.
13. Eckert, Penelope. 2002. “Constructing meaning in sociolinguistic variation”. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans. http://www. stanford.edu-eckert/AAA02.pdf.
14. Eckert, Penelope, and John R. Rickford, eds. 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Goffman, Erving. 1981. “Footing”. In E. Goffman, ed. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 124-59.
16. Guy, Gregory, Barbara Horvath, Julia Vonwiller, Elaine Daisley, and Inge Rogers. 1986. “An intonational change in progress in Australian English”. Language in Society 15: 23-51.
17. Horvath, Barbara. 1985. Variation in Australian English. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Johnstone, Barbara. 2004. “How to sound like a Pittsburgher, and why: Stancetaking and vernacular norm-formation”. Paper presented at the Linguistics Symposium on Stance, Rice University, Houston.
19. Keneally, Thomas. 2004. “Gulags in the sun”. The Guardian February 21, 2004. http://www. guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4862182-103425,00.html. Accessed June 22, 2004.
20. Kiesling, Scott F. 1998. “Variation and men’s identity in a fraternity”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2: 69-100.
21. Kiesling, Scott F. 2001. “Stances of whiteness and hegemony in fraternity men’s discourse”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 101-15.
22. Kiesling, Scott F. 2003. “Prestige, cultural models, and other ways of thinking about underlying norms in language and gender”. In Janet Homes and Miriam Meyerhoff, eds. Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 509-27.
23. Kiesling, Scott F. 2004a. “Norms and social meaning in language use: Indexicality, stance, and cultural models”. In Scott F. Kiesling and Christina Bratt Paulston, eds. Intercultural Discourse and Communication: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell, 92-104.
24. Kiesling, Scott F. 2004b. “Dude”. American Speech 79: 281-305.
25. Kiesling, Scott F. in press. “Language and identity in sociocultural anthropology”. In Michael Silver-stein, ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Second Edition): Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Elsevier.
26. Kiesling, Scott F and Toni Borowsky. 2001. “The ‘jewel highway’ to /uw/-fronting in Australia?” Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 30, Raleigh, North Carolina.
27. Labov, William. 1984. “Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation”. In John Baugh and Joel Sherzer, eds. Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 28-53
28. Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29. Labov, William. 2001a. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
30. Labov, William. 2001b. “The anatomy of style shifting”. In Eckert and Rickford, eds.: 85-108.
31. LePage, Robert B. and Andrée Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Malcolm, Ian. 2000. “Aboriginal English: Adopted code of a surviving culture” In Blair and Collins, eds.: 201-22.
33. McLemore, Cynthia, 1991. “The pragmatic interpretation of English intonation: Sorority speech” PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
34. Meyerhoff, Miriam. 1998. “Accommodating your data: The use and misuse of accommodation theory in sociolinguistics”. Language and Communication 18: 205-25.
35. Mitchell, Alexander and Arthur Delbridge. 1965. The Pronunciation of English in Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
36. Morford, Janet. 1997. “Social indexicality in French pronominal address”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7: 3-37.
37. Nearey, Terence. 1977. “Phonetic feature system for vowels”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
38. Ochs, Elinor. 1992. “Indexing gender.” In Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, eds. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335-58.
39. Ochs, Elinor. 1993. “Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 287-306.
40. Ochs, Elinor, and Carolyn Taylor. 1995. “The ‘father knows best’ dynamic in dinnertime narratives”. In Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz, eds. Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York, London: Routledge, 97-120.
41. Perry, Theodore L., Ralph N. Ohde and Daniel H. Ashmead. 2001. “The acoustic bases for gender identification from children’s voices”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109: 2988-98.
42. Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 1998. “Investigating ‘self-conscious’ speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English”. Language in Society 27: 53-83.
43. Silverstein, Michael. 1993. “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function”. In John A. Lucy, ed. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33-58.
44. Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Warren, Jane. 2001. “‘Wogspeak’: Transformations of Australian English”. In Bronwen Levy and Ffion Murphy, eds. Stories/Telling. The Woodford Forum. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press, 118-33. [Originally published in the Journal of Australian Studies 62: 86-94, 1999.]
46. Wassink, Alicia Beckford and Judy Dyer. 2004. “Language ideology and the transmission of phonological change: Changing indexicality in two situations of language contact”. Journal of English Linguistics 32: 3-30.
47. Watson, Catherine and Jonathan Harrington. 1999. “Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106: 458-68.