Political interviews as hybrid genre

Text

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 353-397

  Lauerbach, Gerda ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Appraisal theory; Genre; Inference; Interview; Move schemata; Preference; Talk show

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248703516     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.2004.015     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Baker, C. (1975). This is just a first approximation, but '⋯'. In Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (ed.), 37-47. Chicago: CLS
2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Speech and Other Late Essays, M. M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist and C. Emerson (eds.), 60-102. Austin: University of Texas Press
3. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana
4. Becker, A. (forthcoming). Interviews in TV election night broadcasts: A framework for cross-cultural analysis. In Selected Papers from the 9th IADA Conference, Salzburg 2003. A. Betten (ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer
5. Bernstein, B. (1990). The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. Class, Codes and Control, vol. 4. London/New York: Routledge
6. Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. In Discourse & Society 10 (4): 543-582
7. Blum-Kulka, S. (1983). The dynamics of political interviews. In Text 3: 131-153
8. Blumler, J. G. and Gurevitch, M. (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge
9. Boorstin, D. (1987). Das Image-Der Amerikanische Traum. Reinbek: Rowohlt
10. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1989). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Central Office of Information (1993). Broadcasting. London: HMSD
12. Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
13. Cohen, N. (1998). The death of news. New Statesman, 22 May 1998
14. Curran, J. (1991). Mass media and democracy: A reappraisal. In Mass Media and Society, J. Blumler and M. Gurevitch (eds.), 82-117. London: Edward Arnold
15. Eggins, S. and Slade, D. (1997). Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell
16. Ehlich, K. and Rehbein, J. (1979). Sprachliche Handlungsmuster. In Interpretative Verfahren in den Text- und Sozialwissenschaften, H.-C. Soeffner (ed.), 243-274. Stuttgart: Metzler
17. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold
18. Fiske, J. (1987). Television Culture. London/New York: Routledge
19. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
20. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row
21. -(1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
22. Greatbatch, D. J. (1986). Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: the use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture and Society 8: 441-455
23. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), 41-58. New York: Academic Press
24. Hall, S. (1972). The external-internal dialectic in broadcasting: television's double-bind. In Fourth Symposium on Broadcasting Policy, Feb. 1972, F. S. Badley (ed.), 91-105
25. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold
26. -(1985). An Introduction to Functional GramMar London: Edward Arnold
27. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press
28. Hampel, M. (forthcoming). Intersubjective positioning in election night discourse. A cross-cultural analysis. In Selected Papers from the 9th IADA Conference, Salzburg 2003. A. Betten (ed.). Tūbingen: Niemeyer
29. Harris, S. (1991). Evasive action: how politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In Broadcast Talk, P. Scannell (ed.), 76-99. London: Sage
30. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press
31. -(1985). Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, T. van Dijk (ed.), 95-117. London: Academic Press
32. Heritage, J., Clayman, S., and Zimmerman, D. (1988). Discourse and message analysis-the micro-structure of mass media messages. In Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, R. P. Hawkins et al. (eds.), 77-109. Newbury Park
33. Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In Talk and Social Structure, D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds.), 93-137. Cambridge: Polity Press
34. Heritage, J. and Roth, A. L. (1995). GramMar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (1): 1-60
35. Heritage, J. and Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In Everyday Language, G. Psathas (ed.), 123-162. New York: Irvington
36. Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press
37. Jucker, A. (1986). News Interviews. A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins
38. Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193-216
39. Kress, G. (1993). Genre as social process. In The Powers of Literacy-A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing, B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (eds.), 22-37. London: Falmer
40. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images-The GramMar of Visual Design. London: Routledge
41. Küng-Shankleman, L. (2000). Inside the BBC and CNN-Managing Media Organisations. London: Routledge
42. Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press
43. Lakoff, R. (1971). If's, and's and but's about conjunction. In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, C. Fillraore and T. Langendoen (eds.), 115-150. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
44. Lauerbach, G. (1989). We don't want war, but,⋯-speech act schemata and interschema-interference transfer. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 25-51
45. -(1991). Speech act schemata and discourse type. In Anglistentag 1990 Marburg, Proceedings, C. Uhlig and R. Zimmermann (eds.), 334-347. Tūbingen: Niemeyer
46. -(1993a). The analysis of conversation and its discontents: The case of preference organization. In Anglistentag 1992 Stuttgart. Proceedings, H. U. Seeber and W. Göbel (eds.), 428-436. Tübingen: Niemeyer
47. -(1993b). Interaction and cognition: Speech act schemata with but and their interaction with discourse type. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, R. A. Geiger and B. Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), 679-708. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
48. -(2000a). Negotiating defeat in election night coverage. In Working With Dialogue-Selected Papers of the IADA Conference, Birmingham 1999, M. Coulthard et al. (eds.), 107-120. Tūbingen: Niemeyer
49. -(2000b). Discourse analysis at the interface of politics and the media: TV election night coverage. In Anglistentag 1999 Proceedings, B. Reitz (ed.), 477-491. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag
50. -(2001). Implicit communication in political interviews: Negotiating the agenda. In The Dialogic Question, E. Weigand and M. Dascal (eds.), 197-214. Amsterdam: Benjamins
51. -(2003a). Opting out of the media-politics contract. Discourse practices in confrontational television interviews. In Selected Papers from the IADA Conference, Bologne 2000, M. Bondi (ed.), 283-294. Tübingen: Niemeyer
52. -(2003b). Voicing and ventriloquizing-the constructive role of discourse representation in political interviews. In Sonderheft Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 8 (2/3): 176-186
53. -(forthcoming). Election night: A cross-cultural analysis of presenting practices. In Selected Papers from the 9th IADA Conference, Salzburg 2003, A. Betten (ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer
54. Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics 17 (5/5): 365-399
55. -(1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
56. -(2000). Presumptive Meanings-The Tlieory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
57. Luckmann, T. (1986). Grundformen der gesellschaftlichen Vermittlung des Wissens: Kommunikative Gattungen. In Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Soiialpsychologie Sonderheft 27 (Kultur und Gesellschaft): 191-211
58. -(1988). Kommunikative Gattungen im kommunikativen Haushalt einer Gesellschaft. In Der Ursprung der Literatur, G. Smolka-Koerdt et al. (eds.), 279-288. Munich: Fink
59. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Evaluation in Text-Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.), 142-175. Oxford: Oxford University Press
60. Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), 14-31. London: Sage
61. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
62. Rehbein, J. (1984). ReMarks on the empirical analysis of action and speech. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 49-63
63. Rumelhart, D. and Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, R. Anderson and W. Montague (eds.), 99-135. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
64. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Talk and Social Organisation, G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds.), 54-69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
65. Sarcinelli, U. (1987). Symbolische Politik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
66. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 79: 1075-1095
67. -(1989). From interview to confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 215-240
68. -(1999). 'Schegloff's texts' as Billig's Ddta: A critical reply. Discourse & Society 10 (4): 558-572
69. Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 7 (4): 289-327
70. Schieß, R. (forthcoming). Lights, camera, action: Visualizing TV election nights across cultures. In Selected Papers from the 9th IADA Conference, Salzburg 2003, A. Betten (ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer
71. Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction. London/New York: Longman
72. Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse-The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press
73. White, P. (1999a). An introductory tour through appraisal theory, ms
74. -(1999b). Appraisal and a gramMar of solidarity: New developments in the theory of modality, evidentiality, hedging and attitude, ms
75. -(2000). Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In Dialogue Analysis VII: Working with Dialogue, M. Coulthard et al. (eds.), 67-80. Tübingen: Niemeyer
76. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.) (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage