Discourse genre and linguistic mode: Interpreter influences in visual and tactile interpreted interaction

Sign Language Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Metzger, Melanie ^a   Fleetwood, Earl ^b   Collins, Steven D ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Sign Language Associates

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248703190     PISSN: 03021475     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/sls.2004.0004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Angelelli, C. 2001. Deconstructing the Invisible Interpreter: A Critical Study of the Interpersonal Role of the Interpreter in a Cross-Cultural/ Linguistic Communicative Event. Ph.D. diss., Stanford University
2. Berk-Seligson, S. 1990. The Bilingual Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
3. Collins, S., and K. Petronio. 1998. What Happens in Tactile ASL? In Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities, ed. C. Lucas, 18-37. Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, vol. 4. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press
4. Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
5. La Bue, M. A. 1998. Interpreted Education: A Study of Deaf Students' Access to the Content and Form of Literacy Instruction in a Mainstreamed High School English Class. Ph.D. diss., Harvard University
6. Liddell, S., and M. Metzger. 1998. Gesture in Sign Language Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30:657-97
7. Mesch. J. 2000. Tactile Swedish Sign Language: Turn Taking in Signed Conversations of People Who Are Deaf and Blind. In Bilingualism and Identity in Deaf Communities, ed. M. Metzger, 187-203. Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, vol. 6. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press
8. Metzger, M. 1995a. Constructed Action and Constructed Dialogue in American Sign Language. In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, ed. C. Lucas, 255-71. Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press
9. -. 1995b. The Paradox of Neutrality: A Comparison of Interpreters' Goals with the Reality of Interactive Discourse. Ph.D. diss., Georgetown University
10. -. 1999. Sign Language Interpreting: Deconstructing the Myth of Neutrality. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press
11. Roy, C. 1989. Features of Discourse in an American Sign Language Lecture. In Sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community, ed. C. Lucas, 231-51. San Diego: Academic Press
12. -. 2000. Interpreting as a Discourse Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press
13. Sanheim, L. In press. Turn Exchange in an Interpreted Medical Encounter. In From Topic Boundaries to Omission: New Research on Interpretation, ed. M. Metzger, V. Dively, S. Collins, and R. Shaw. Studies in Interpretation series, vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press
14. Smith, T. 1992. Deaf-Blind Communication and Community, Getting Involved: A Conversation. Burtonsville, Md.: Sign Media. Videorecording
15. -. 1994. Guidelines: Practical Tips for Working and Socializing with Deaf-Blind People. Burtonsville, Md.: Sign Media
16. Wadensjö, C. 1992. Interpreting as Interaction: On Dialogue Interpreting in Immigration Hearings and Medical Encounters. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping Studies in Arts and Sciences, Linköping University
17. -. 1998. Interpreting in Interaction. London: Longman
18. Winston, E. 1991. Spatial Referencing and Cohesion in an American Sign Language Text. Sign Language Studies 73: 397-410
19. -. 1992. Space and Involvement in an American Sign Language Lecture. In Expanding Horizons: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Convention of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, ed. J. Plant-Moeller, 93-105. Silver Spring, Md.: RID Publications