Temporal and spatial dimensions of discourse organisation

Journal of French Language Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 115-130

  Charolles, Michel ^a   le Draoulec, Anne ^b   Pery Woodley, Marie Paule ^b   Sarda, Laure ^a  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248703148     PISSN: 09592695     EISSN: 14740079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0959269505002036     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Asher, N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (1994). Intentions and information in discourse, 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Las Cruces, NM, pp. 34–41.
3. Bateman, J. and Rondhuis, K. J. (1997). ‘Coherence Relations’. Towards a General Specification. Discourse Processes, 24(1): 3–50.
4. Borillo, A., Bras, M., Le Draoulec, A., De Swart, H., Vieu, L., Molendijk, A., Verkuyl, H., Vet, C., Vetters, C. and Vieu, L. (2004). Tense, connectives and discourse structure. In: F. Corblin and H. de Swart (eds), Handbook of French Semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 309–348.
5. Bras, M., Le Draoulec, A. and Vieu, L. (2001). French adverbial Puis between temporal structure and discourse structure. In: M. Bras and L. Vieu (eds), Semantic and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue: Experimenting with Current Theories. CRiSPI series, vol. 9, Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 109–146.
6. Busquets, J., Vieu, L. and Asher, N. (2001). La SDRT: une approche de la cohérence du discours dans la tradition de la sémantique dynamique. Verbum, 23(1): 73–103.
7. Charolles, M. (1983). Coherence as a principle in the interpretation of discourse. Text, 3(1): 71–99.
8. Charolles, M. (1995). Cohésion, cohérence et pertinence du discours. Travaux de Linguistique, 29: 125–151.
9. Charolles, M. (1997). L'encadrement du discours: univers, champs, domaines et espaces. Cahier de Recherche Linguistique, LANDISCO, URA-CNRS 1035, Université de Nancy 2, 6: 1–73.
10. Charolles, M. (2003). De la topicalité des adverbiaux détachés en tête de phrase. Travaux de Linguistique, 47: 11–51.
11. Charolles, M. and Lamiroy, B. (2002). Syntaxe phrastique et transphrastique: du but au résultat. In: H. Nølke and H. L. Andersen (eds), Macrosyntaxe et macrosémantique. Actes du colloque international d'Aarhus, 17–19 mai 2001. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 383–419.
12. Clark, H. (1977). Bridging. In: P. Johnson-Laird and P. Wason (eds), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 411–420.
13. Degand, L. (1998). On classifying connectives and coherence relations. In: M. Stede, L. Wanner and E. Hovy (eds), Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers. Workshop COLING-ACL'98. Montréal, pp. 29–35.
14. Enkvist, N. E. (1981). Experiential iconicism in text strategy. Text, 1(1): 97–111.
15. Enkvist, N. E. (1987). Text strategies: single, dual, multiple. In: R. Steele and T. Threadgold (eds), Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, Vol. II, pp. 203–211.
16. Gosselin, L. (2004). Contraintes pragmatico-cognitives sur l'ordre des constituents: le cas des connecteurs exprimant la consécution temporelle. In: P. Lane, (ed.), Linguistique du texte et du discours, Presses Universitaires de Rouen, coll. DYALANG.
17. Goutsos, D. (1996). A model of sequential relations in expository text. Text, 16(4): 501–533.
18. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.
19. Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3): 175–204.
20. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
21. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
22. Hansen, M-B. Mosegaard (1995). Puis in spoken French: from time adjunct to additive conjunct?, Journal of French Language Studies, 5: 31–56.
23. Heinämäki, O. (1974). Semantics of English temporal connectives. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
24. Hybertie, C. (1996). La conséquence en français. Paris: Ophrys.
25. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Kamp, H. and Rohrer, C. (1983). Tense in texts. In: R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechox (eds), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 250–269.
27. Le Draoulec, A. (2005). Connecteurs temporels d'immédiateté: le cas de aussitôt et soudain. Cahiers Chronos, 12: 19–34.
28. Le Draoulec, A. and Bras, M. (2004). Rôles de alors temporel dans la structuration du discours. Colloque Chronos 6, 22–24 sept. 2004, Genève.
29. Le Draoulec, A. and Péry-Woodley, M-P. (2001). Corpus-based identification of temporal organisation in discourse. In: P. Rayson, A. Wilson, T. McEnery, A. Hardie and S. Khoja (eds), Corpus Linguistics 2001. Lancaster, pp. 159–166.
30. Le Draoulec, A. and Péry-Woodley, M-P. (2003). Time travel in text: temporal framing in narratives and non-narratives. In: L. Lagerwerf, W. Spooren and L. Degand (eds), Determination of Information and Tenor in Texts. Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse 2003. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek & Münster: Nodus Publikationen, pp. 267–275.
31. Le Draoulec, A. and Péry-Woodley, M-P. (forthcoming). Encadrement temporel et relations de discours. Langue Française.
32. Maier, E. and Hovy, E. (1993). Organising discourse structure relations using metafunctions. In: H. Horacek and M. Zock (eds), New Concepts in Natural Language Generation. London: Pinter, pp. 69–86.
33. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. (1986). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 9(1): 57–90.
34. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3): 243–281.
35. Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
36. Nølke, H. (1990). Les adverbiaux contextuels: problèmes de classification. Langue Française, 88: 12–27.
37. Péry-Woodley, M-P. (2000). Cadrer ou centrer son discours? Introducteurs de cadres et centrage. Verbum, 22(1): 59–78.
38. Redeker, G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 367–381.
39. Redeker, G. (1991). Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29: 1139–1172.
40. Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27: 53–94.
41. Sanders, T. J. M. and Spooren, W. (2001). Text representation as an interface between language and its users. In: T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord and W. Spooren (eds), Text Representation - Linguistic and Psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Sandström, G. (1993). When-clauses and the Temporal Interpretation of Narrative Discourse. PhD Dissertation, University of Umeå.
43. Schrepfer-André, G. (in press). Sur la portée textuelle des introducteurs de cadres de discours en selon X: les indices de fermeture des univers énonciatifs. In: Actes du Colloque international: ‘La Médiation, marquage en langue et en discours’. Université de Rouen, décembre 2000.
44. Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In: P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 59–82.
45. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Thompson, S. A. (1985). Grammar and written discourse: initial vs final purpose clauses in English. Text, 5(1–2): 55–84.
48. van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London/New York: Longman.
49. Vander Linden, K. and Martin, J. H. (1995). Expressing rhetorical relations in instructional text: a case study of the purpose relation. Computational Linguistics, 21(1): 29–58.
50. van der Sandt, R. A. (1992). Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9: 333–377.
51. Vetters, C. (1996). Temps, aspect et narration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
52. Vigier, D. (in press). Les syntagmes prépositionnels en ‘en N’ détachés en tête de phrase référant à des domaines d'activité. In: Actes du Colloque Syntaxe et Sémantique (Bari, septembre 2002), Lingvisticae Investigationes.
53. Virtanen, T. (1992a). Temporal adverbials in text structuring: on temporal text strategy. In: A. C. Lindberg, N. Enkvist and K. Wikberg (eds), Nordic Research on Text and Discourse: NORDTEXT symposium 1990. Åbo: Åbo Academic Press, pp. 185–197.
54. Virtanen, T. (1992b). Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English. Åbo: Åbo Academic Press.
55. Webber, B., Joshi, A., Stone, M. and Knott, A. (2003). Anaphora and discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 29: 545–587.