Column morphological simplicity in pidgins and creoles

Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 139-162

  Siegel, Jeff ^a,b  

^a University of Hawai'i

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248702978     PISSN: 09209034     EISSN: 15699870     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/jpcl.19.1.06sie     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alleyne, M. C. (2000). Opposite processes in "creolization". In I. Neumann-Holzschuh & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages (pp. 125-133). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Arends, J. (2001). Simple grammars, complex languages. Linguistic Typology, 5(2/3), 180-182.
3. Baker, P. (1997). Directionality in pidginization and creolization. In A. K. Spears & D. Winford (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles (pp. 91-109). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4. Baker, P. (2000). Theories of creolization and the degree and nature of restructuring. In I. Neumann-Holzschuh & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages (pp. 41-63). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
5. Baker, P., & Huber, M. (2000). Constructing new pronominal systems from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Linguistics, 38(5), 833-866.
6. Bakker, P. (1995). Pidgins. In J. Arends, P. Muysken, & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and creoles: An introduction (pp. 25-39). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 29-79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173-221.
10. Bickerton, D. (1999). How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 49-74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chaudenson, R. (1992). Des îles, des hommes, des langues. Paris: L'Harmattan.
12. Chaudenson, R. (2001). Creolization of language and culture (revised in collaboration with Salikoko S. Mufwene). London: Routledge.
13. Clements, J. C. (2003). The tense-aspect system in pidgins and naturalistically learned L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(2), 245-281.
14. Corder, S. P. (1977). "Simple codes" and the source of the second language learner's heuristic hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1(1), 1-10.
15. Corder, S. P. (1981). Formal simplicity and functional simplification in second language acquisition. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), New dimensions in second language research (pp. 146-152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
16. DeGraff, M. (1999). Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: An epilogue. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 473-543). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. DeGraff, M. (2001a). Morphology in creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 53-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. DeGraff, M. (2001b). On the origins of creoles: A Cartesian critique of neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology, 5(2/3), 213-310.
19. DeGraff, M. (2003). Against creole exceptionalism. Language, 79(2), 391-410.
20. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Ferguson, C. A. (1971). Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity. A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk, and pidgins. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages (pp. 141-150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
23. Hawai'i Educational Review (1921). A new course of study. Hawai'i Educational Review, 11(2), 1-24.
24. Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Horvath, B. M. (1985). Variation in Australian English: The sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hymes, D. (1971). Introduction [to Part III]. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages (pp. 65-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Jespersen, O. (1922). Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen and Unwin.
28. Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), 301-347.
29. Kusters, W., & Muysken, P. (2001). The complexities of arguing about complexity. Linguistic Typology, 5(2/3), 182-185.
30. Labov, W. (1990). On the adequacy of natural languages: I. The development of tense. In J. V. Singler (Ed.), Pidgin and creole tense-mood-aspect systems (pp. 1-58). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
31. Lefebvre, C. (1998). Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lynch, J., & Capell, A. (1983). Sie grammar outline. In J. Lynch (Ed.), Studies in the languages of Erromango (pp. 11-74). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (Series C, No. 79).
33. Mather, P.-A. (2000). Creole genesis: Evidence from West African L2 French. In D. G. Gilbers, J. Nerbonne, & J. Schaeken (Eds.), Languages in contact (pp. 247-261). Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA: Rodophi.
34. McWhorter, J. H. (2000). Defining "creole" as a synchronic term. In I. Neumann-Holzschuh & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages (pp. 85-123). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
35. McWhorter, J. H. (2001). The world's simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5(2/3), 125-166.
36. McWhorter, J. H. (2002). The rest of the story: Restoring pidginization to creole genesis theory. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 17(1), 1-48.
37. McWhorter, J. H. (2003). Pidgins and creoles as models of language change: The state of the art. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 202-212.
38. Mufwene, S. S. (1990). Transfer and the substrate hypothesis in creolistics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 1-23.
39. Mufwene, S. S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Mühlhäusler, P. (1974). Pidginization and simplification of language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (Series B, No. 26).
41. Mühlhäusler, P. (1980). Sturctural expansion and the process of creolization. In A. Valdman & A. Highfield (Eds.), Theoretical orientations in creole studies (pp. 19-55). New York: Academic Press.
42. Mühlhäusler, P. (1997). Pidgin and creole linguistics. London: University of Westminster Press.
43. Muysken, P. (2001). The origin of creole languages: The perspective of second language learning. In N. Smith & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Creolization and contact (pp. 157-173). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
44. Muysken, P., & Smith, N. (1995). The study of pidgin and creole languages. In N. Smith (Ed.), Pidgins and creoles: An introduction (pp. 3-14). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
45. Rickford, J. R. (1992). Pidgins and creoles. In W. Bright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, Volume III (pp. 224-232). New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Romaine, S. (1988). Pidgin and creole languages. London: Longman.
47. Sebba, M. (1997). Contact languages: Pidgins and creoles. New York: St Martin's Press.
48. Siegel, J. (1995). How to get a laugh in Fijian: Code-switching and humor. Language in Society, 24(1), 95-110.
49. Siegel, J. (1997). Mixing, leveling and pidgin/creole development. In A. K. Spears & D. Winford (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles (pp. 111-149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Siegel, J. (1998). Dialectal differences and substrate reinforcement in Melane-sian Pidgin. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2, 347-373.
51. Siegel, J. (1999). Transfer constraints and substrate influence in Melanesian Pidgin. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 14, 1-44.
52. Siegel, J. (2003). Substrate influence in creoles and the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(2), 185-209.
53. Siegel, J. (in press). Fiji pidgins and pidgin/creole origins. In J. den Besten, M. Parkvall & P. Baker (Eds.), Starting from scratch. London: Battlebridge.
54. Singh, I. (2000). Pidgins and creoles: An introduction. London: Arnold.
55. Syea, A. (2002). Future developments in creole languages: Moving away from analycity. In G. Gilbert (Ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics in the twenty-first century (pp. 199-228). New York: Peter Lang.
56. Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
57. Traugott, E. C. (1973). Some thoughts on natural syntactic processes. In C.-J. N. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English (pp. 313-322). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
58. Traugott, E. C. (1977). Natural semantax: Its role in the study of second language acquisition. In S. P. Corder & E. Roulet (Eds.), The notions of simplification, interlanguage and pidgins, and their relation to second language pedagogy (pp. 132-162). Geneva: Droz.
59. Trudgill, P. (2002). Sociolinguistic variation and change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
60. Verhaar, J. W. M. (1995). Toward a reference grammar of Tok Pisin: An experiment in corpus linguistics. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
61. Véronique, D. (1994). Naturalistic adult acquisition of French as L2 and French-based creole genesis compared: Insights into creolization and language change. In D. Adone & I. Plag (Eds.), Creolization and language change (pp. 117-137). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
62. Wekker, H. (1996). Creolization and the acquisition of English as a second language. In H. Wekker (Ed.), Creole languages and language acquisition (pp. 139-149). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Willett, T. (1988). A cross-disciplinary survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51-97.
64. Zobl, H. (1982). A direction for contrastive analysis: The comparative study of developmental sequences. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 169-183.