The Impact of a Structured Integrated Learning System on First-Grade Students' Reading Gains

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 361-376

  Cassady, Jerrell C ^a   Smith, Lawrence L ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248702748     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10573560591002277     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 101-130.
2. Cassady, J. C. & Smith, L. L. (2004). The impact of a reading-focused integrated learning system on phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(4), 947-964.
3. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
4. Clay, M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. CTB=McGraw-Hill (October 1997). Terra Nova technical bulletin. Monterey, CA: CTB=McGraw-Hill.
5. Cunningham, P. A., Hall, D. P., & Defee, M. (1991). Non-ability grouped multilevel instruction: A year in a first-grade classroom. Reading Teacher, 44, 106-115.
6. Davis, B. C. & Shade, D. D. (1999). Integrating technology in the early childhood classroom: The case of literacy learning. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1999(1), 221-254.
7. DeFord, D. (1985). Validating the construct of theoretical orientation in reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 336-367.
8. Ferguson, D. (2001). Technology in a constructivist classroom. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2001(1), 45-55.
9. Fitzgerald, G. E. & Koury, K. A. (1996). Empirical advances in technology-assisted instruction for students with mild and moderate disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 526-553.
10. Foster, K. C., Erickson, G. C., Foster, D. F., Brinkman, D., & Torgeson, J. K. (1994). Computer assisted instruction in phonological awareness: Evaluation of the DaisyQuest program. The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(2), 127-136.
11. Kamil, M. L., Intrator, S. M., & Kim, H. S. (2000). The effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 771-788). Vol. 3, Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
12. Liao, Y. C. (1999). Effects of hypermedia on students' achievement: A metaanalysis. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(3), 255-277.
13. Lundberg, I. (1995). The computer as a tool of remediation in the education of students with reading disabilities-a theory-based approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 89-99.
14. Mathes, P. G., Torgeson, J. K., & Allor, J. H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 371-410.
15. Mitchell, M. J. & Fox, B. J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 40(4), 315-332.
16. Paterson, W. A., Henry, J. J., O'Quin, K., Ceprano, M. A., & Blue, E. V. (2003). Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated learning system on early emergent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 172-207.
17. Pearson Digital. About the Waterford Early Reading Program. Available at: http://www.pearsondigital.com/EE_1a_WERP/EE_1a1_WERP_PO.htm. Accessed April 6, 2003.
18. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
19. Taylor, B. M. & Pearson, P. D. (2000). The CIERA school change classroom observation scheme. Minneapolis, MN: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
20. Torgeson, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 55-64.
21. Underwood, J. D. M. (2000). A comparison of two types of computer support for reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 136-148.
22. van Daal, V. H. P. & Reitsma, P. (2000). Computer-assisted learning to read and spell: Results from two pilot studies. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 181-193.