Genre and institution: Narrative temporality in final arguments

Narrative Inquiry

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 41-69

  Carranza, Isolda E ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248702333     PISSN: 13876740     EISSN: 15699935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ni.13.1.02car     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Atchinson, P. (1999). Medical discourse, evidentiality and the construction of professional responsibility. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (Eds.), Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings (pp. 75-107). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Amsterdam, A. G., & Bruner J. (2000). Minding the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
4. Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event. Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bauman, R. (2000). Language, identity, performance. Pragmatics, 10(1), 1-5.
6. Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59-88.
7. Briggs, C. (1988). Competence in performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Briggs, C. (1993). ‘I’m not just talking to the victims of oppression tonight - I’m talking to everybody’: Rhetorical authority in an African American poetics of political engagement. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 3(1), 33-78.
9. Beneveniste, E. (1971/1966). Problemas de lingüística general [Problems of general linguistics]. Mexico: Siglo XXI.
10. Carranza, I. E. (1998). Low-narrativity narratives and argumentation. Narrative Inquiry, 8(2), 1-31.
11. Carranza, I. E. (2000). Actuación y heterogeneidad en el discurso publico [Performance and heterogeneity in public discourse]. Plenary speech. Actas del VIII Congreso de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística [Proceedings of the VIII Linguistic Society of Argentina conference. Electronic publication]. Mar del Plata: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
12. Carranza, I. E. (2001). Argumentar, explicar y justificar con preguntas retóricas [Arguing, explaining, and justifying with rhetorical questions]. Revista iberoamericana de Discurso y Sociedad, 3(2), 61-83.
13. Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
14. Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1995). Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law & Society Review, 29(2), 197-226.
15. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
17. Fernandez Lagunilla, M. (1999). Las construcciones de gerundio. [Gerund constructions] In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramatica descriptiva de la lengua española [Descriptive grammar of the Spanish language] Vol. 2 (pp. 3433-3501). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
18. Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Seuil.
19. Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press [orig. Discours du reícit].
20. Genette, G. (1998/1983). Nuevo discurso del relato (New discourse on the story) Madrid: Catedra. [Nouveau discours du recit. Paris: Editions du Seuil].
21. Hall, C., Sarangi, S., & Slembrouk, S. (1997). Moral construction in social work discourse. In B-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. 265-291). London: Longman.
22. Hanks, W. (1987). Discourse genres in a theory of practice. American Ethnologist, 14(4), 668-692.
23. Herman, D. (Ed.). (1999). Introduction. Narratologies. New perspectives on narrative analysis (pp. 1-30). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
24. Hyden, L. (1997). The institutional narrative as drama. In B-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. 245-264). London: Longman.
25. Jonson, L., & Linell, P. (1991). Story generations: from dialogical interviews to written reports in police interrogations. Text, 11(3), 419-440.
26. Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the inner city. Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 354-396). Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
27. Labov, W. (1997). Further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 395-415.
28. Lyons, J. (1980/1978). Semántica. Barcelona: Teide. [orig. Semantics II. London: Cambridge University Press].
29. Lunn, P. V. (1995). The evaluative function of the Spanish subjunctive. In J. Bybee & S. Fleis-chman (Eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse (pp. 429-449). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
30. Perez Saldaña, M. (1999). El modo en las subordinadas relativas y adverbiales. [Mood in relative and adverbial clauses] In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramatica descriptiva de la lengua española [Descriptive grammar of the Spanish language] Vol. 2 (pp. 3253-3322). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
31. Prince, G. (1987). Dictionary of narratology. Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.
32. Real Academia Española de la Lengua [The Royal Spanish Academy of Language]. (1973). Esbozo de una nueva gramatica de la lengua española. [Outline of a new grammar of the Spanish language.] Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
33. Schiffrin, D. (1984). How a story says what it means and does. Text, 4(4), 313-346.
34. Stygall, G. (1994). Trial language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
35. Umphrey, M. M. (1999). The dialogics of legal meaning: Spectacular trials, the unwritten law, and narraitives of criminal responsibility. Law & Society Review, 32(2), 393-423.
36. Weinrich, H. (1978/1964). Estructura y función de los tiempos en el lenguaje. [Structure and function of tenses in the language] Madrid: Gredos.
37. White, H. (1980). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry, 7, 5-27.