Suppletion in personal pronouns: Theory versus practice, and the place of reproducibility in typology

Linguistic Typology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-23

  Corbett, Greville G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animacy hierarchy; Associative; Case; Count mass; Database; Inclusive exclusive; Inflection; Minimal augmented; Number; Paradigm; Personal pronoun; Plural; Pronoun; Reproducibility; Suppletion; Syncretism

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248700582     PISSN: 14300532     EISSN: 1613415X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/lity.2005.9.1.1     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Aissen, Judith (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435-483
2. Allan, Keith (1980). Nouns and countability. Language 56: 541-567
3. Anderson, Gregory D. S. (1998). Xakas. (Languages of the World/Materials, 251.) München: Lincom Europa
4. Birulin, A. N. (1980). Kategorija čisla v mestoimenijax. In V. M. Andrjučenko (ed.), Issledovanie v oblasti grammatik i tipologii jazykov, 145-164. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta
5. Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina, Greville G. Corbett, & Andrew Hippisley (2004). The Surrey Suppletion Database. Available at http://www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/
6. Bunn, Gordon (1974). Golin Grammar. (Workpapers in Papua New Guinea Languages, 5.) Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics
7. Chappell, Hilary (1996). Inalienability and the personal domain in Mandarin Chinese discourse. In Hilary Chappell & William McGregor (eds.), The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Parts and the Part-Whole Relation, 465-527. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
8. Chatterji, Suniti Kumar (1926 [1975]). The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. II: Morphology. Calcutta: Calcutta University Press. Republished, Calcutta: Rupa
9. Chumakina, Marina, Andrew Hippisley & Greville G. Corbett (2004). Istoričeskie izmenenija v russkoj leksike: Slučai čeredujučegosja suppletivizma. Russian Linguistics 28: 281-315
10. Comrie, Bernard (1986). On delimiting cases. In Richard D. Brecht & James S. Levine (eds.), Case in Slavic, 86-106. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica
11. Conklin, Harold C. (1962). Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. In Fred W. Householder & Sol Saporta (eds.), Problems in Lexicography (Publication of the Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics 21, =International Journal of American Linguistics 28-2, pt. 4), 119-141. Bloomington: Indiana University. [Second edition 1967.]
12. Corbett, Greville G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. - (2003a). Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In Geert Booij, Janet DeCesaris, Angela Ralli, & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Topics in Morphology: Selected Papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, September 20-22, 2001), 109-128. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Available at http://www.surrey.ac.uk/LIS/SMG/projects/ agreement/outputs.html
14. - (2003b). Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 101: 155-202
15. Corbett, Greville G. & Marianne Mithun (1996). Associative forms in a typology of number systems: Evidence from Yup'ik. Journal of Linguistics 32: 1-17
16. Cysouw, Michael (2003). The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press
17. Danièl', Mixail (2000). Tipologija associativnoj množestvennosti. Avtoreferat kandidatskoj dissertacii, Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj gumanitarnyj universitet
18. - (2002). Javljajetsja li inkljuziv mestoimenijem pervogo lica? (Terminologičeskij ekskurs v tipologičeskoj perspektive.) In Vladimir A. Plungian & Anna Ju. Urmančieva (eds.), Jazyki mira, tipologija, uralistika: Pamjati T Ždanovoj, 232-252. Moskva: Indrik
19. - (forthcoming a). Plurality in independent personal pronouns. To appear in Matthew Dryer, Martin Haspelmath, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie (eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press
20. - (forthcoming b). Understanding inclusives. To appear in Elena Filimonova (ed.), Clusivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins
21. Elson, Ben (1960). Sierra Popoluca morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 26: 206-223
22. Evans, Nicholas (2003). Bininj Gun-wok: A Pan-dialectal Grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune. (Pacific Linguistics, 541.) Canberra: Australian National University
23. Fennell, Trevor G. (1975). Is there an instrumental case in Latvian? Journal of Baltic Studies 6: 41-18
24. Fennell, Trevor G. & Henry Gelsen (1980). A Grammar of Modern Latvian, Volume 1. The Hague: Mouton
25. Filimonova, Elena (1999). Universal'nye anomalii ličnyx mestoimenij. Doctoral dissertation, Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet
26. - (2002). Toward universals of pronominal plural inflection or Do pronouns always take after nouns? In Reinhard Rapp (ed.), Sprachwissenschaft auf dem Weg in das dritte Jahrtausend: Akten des 34. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Germersheim 1999, Teil 1: Text, Bedeutung, Kommunikation, 317-324. Frankfurt: Lang
27. Foley, William A. (1986). The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
28. Forchheimer, Paul (1953). The Category of Person in Language. Berlin: de Gruyter
29. Goddard, Cliff (1995). Who are We? The natural semantics of pronouns. Language Sciences 17: 99-121
30. Green, Tom (1992). Covert clause structure in the Miskitu noun phrase. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
31. Hippisley, Andrew, Marina Chumakina, Greville G. Corbett, & Dunstan Brown (2004). Suppletion: Frequency, categories and distribution of stems. Studies in Language 28: 387-418
32. Huntley, David (1993). Old Church Slavonic. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic Languages, 125-187. London: Routledge
33. Hyman, Larry M. (1981). Noni Grammatical Structure, with Special Reference to Verb Morphology. (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 9.) Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
34. Isačenko, Aleksandr V. (1961 [1976]). O grammatičeskom značenii. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1961-1: 28-43
35. Reprinted in Alexander V. Isačenko, Opera Selecta: Russische Gegenwartssprache, russische Sprachgeschichte, Probleme der slavischen Sprachwissenschaft, 247-262. München: Fink
36. Jackendoff, Ray (1991). Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41: 9-45
37. Krasil'nikova, Elena V. (1990). Imja suščestvitel'noe v russkoj razgovornoj reči: Funkcional'nyj aspekt. Moskva: Nauka
38. Lyons, John (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
39. Masica, Colin P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
40. McKay, Graham R. (1978). Pronominal person and number categories in Rembarrnga and Djeebbana. Oceanic Linguistics 17: 27-37
41. Mel'čuk, Igor (1994). Suppletion: Toward a logical analysis of the concept. Studies in Language 18: 339-410
42. Moravcsik, Edith (1994). Group plural - associative plural or cohort plural. E-mail document, LINGUIST List Vol-5-681, 11 June 1994
43. - (2003). A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27: 469-503
44. Myrkin, Viktor Ja. (1964). Tipologija ličnogo mestoimenija i voprosy rekonstrukcii ego v indoevropejskom aspekte. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1964-5: 78-86
45. Nakanishi, Kimiko & Satoshi Tomioka (2002). On Japanese associative plurals. North East Linguistic Society 32: 423-439
46. Norman, Boris Ju. (2002). Russkoe mestoimenie my: Vnutrennjaja dramaturgija. Russian Linguistics 26: 217-234
47. Nunberg, Geoffrey (1993). Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 1-43
48. Osthoff, Hermann (1899). Vom Suppletivwesen der indogermanischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Wolff
49. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
50. Ramchand, Gillian (2000). Bengali language tutorial. Linguistics Association of Great Britain, Spring meeting, University College London
51. Rood, David S. (1976). Wichita Grammar. New York: Garland
52. Smith-Stark, T. Cedric (1974). The plurality split. Chicago Linguistic Society 10: 657-671
53. Thomas, David (1955). Three analyses of the Ilocano pronoun system. Word 11: 204-208
54. Veksler, Bunim X. & Vladimir A. Jurik (1978). Latyšskij jazyk (samoučitel'). 3rd edition. Rīga: Zvajgzne
55. Vincent, Nigel & Kersti Börjars (1996). Suppletion and syntactic theory. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Papers from the 1st LFG Colloquium, Grenoble, August 1996, 448-462
56. Zaliznjak, A. A. (1973). O ponimanii termina "padež" v lingvističeskix opisanijax. In A. A. Zaliznjak (ed.), Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija, 53-87. Moskva: Nauka