Toward the ethnography of argumentation: A response to Richard Andrews' 'Models of argumentation in educational discourse

Text

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 129-144

  Prior, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Discourse analysis; Ethnography of communication; Rhetoric; Social practice; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248691651     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amann, K. and Knorr-Cetina, K. (1990). The fixation of (visual) evidence. In Representation in Scientific Practice, M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.), 85-121. Cambridge: MIT Press
2. Andrews, R. (1995). Teaching and Learning Argument. London: Cassell
3. Bazerman, C. (1999). The Languages of Edison's Light. Cambridge: MIT Press
4. Beaufort, A. (1999). Writing in the Real World: Making the Transition from School to Work. New York: Teachers College Press
5. Becker, H. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press
6. Burke, K. (1950). A Rlietoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press
7. Cross, G. (1994). Collaboration and Conflict: A Contextual Exploration of Group Writing and Positive Emphasis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
8. Duranti, A. (1994). From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Edmondson, R. (1984). The Rlietoric of Sociology. London: MacMillian
10. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press
11. -(1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
12. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606-633
13. -(2000). Practices of color classification. Mind Culture and Activity 7 (1-2): 19-36
14. -(2003). Pointing as situated practice. In Pointing: Wliere Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, Sotaro Kita (ed.), 217-241. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
15. Goodwin, M. (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
16. Kaufer, D. and Geisler, C. (1991). A scheme for representing academic argument. The Journal of Advanced Composition 11 (1): 107-122
17. LaBerge, S. (1985). Lucid Dreaming. Los Angeles: J. P. Tarcher
18. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
19. -(1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
20. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press
21. Lindstrom, L. (1992). Context contests: Debatable truth statements on Tanna (Vanuatu). In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.), 101-124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. Lunsford, K. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin's model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written Communication 19 (1): 109-174
23. -(2003). Distributed argumentative activity: Redefining arguments and their re-mediation from a sociohistoric perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
24. Mitchell, S. and Riddle, M. (2000). Improving the Quality of Argument in Higher Education: Final Report. Middlesex University, School of Lifelong Learning and Education
25. Prior, P. (1994). Response, revision, disciplinarity: A microhistory of a dissertation prospectus in sociology. Written Communication 11 (4): 483-533
26. -(1998). Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
27. Prior, P. and Shipka, J. (2003). Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In Writing Selves, Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, C
28. Bazerman and D. Russell (eds.), 180-238. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.
29. Ochs, E., Jacoby, S., and Gonzales, P. (1994). Interpretive journeys: How scientists talk and travel through graphic spaces. Configurations 2 (1): 151-171
30. Ochs, E., Taylor, C, Rudolph, D., and Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes 15 (1): 39-72
31. Shipka, J. (2004).'... because doing this allows me to do what doing that would not:' Composition as material, personal, and intellectual negotiation. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication. San Antonio, Texas
32. Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Coulson, R., and Anderson, D. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In Similarity and analogical reasoning, S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), 498-531. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
33. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
34. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
35. -(1972). Human Understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press
36. -(1999). Knowledge as shared procedures. In Perspectives on Activity Theory, Y. Enges-trom, R. Miettinen, and R. Punamaki (eds.), 53-64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
37. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., and Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
38. Vygotksy, L. (1987). Ttiinkinz and Speech (N. Minick, ed. and trans.). New York: Plenum