The case against private provision in the NHS

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 338-339

  Pollock, Allyson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFIT; UNITED KINGDOM; HUMAN;

GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PRIVATE SECTOR; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 34248682644     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588407X183454     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Pollock AM. NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. London: Verso, 2004.
2. Talbot-Smith A, Pollock AM, Gnani S. Questioning the claims from Kaiser. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54: 415-21.
3. Leys C. Market driven politics. London: Verso, 2003.
4. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein D. Costs of Health Care Administration in the United States and Canada.. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 768.
5. National Centre for Health Outcomes Development. ISTC performance management analysis service. Preliminary overview report for schemes GSUP1C, OC123, LP5 and LP5. 3 October 2005, page 3.
6. Pollock AM, Price D. Privatising primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 565-6.
7. last accessed 13 November 2006.