Research note: Telesurveillance as tool supporting the social participation of the elderly at home;Note de recherche: La télésurveillance comme outil favorisant la participation sociale des personnes âgées à domicile

Canadian Journal on Aging

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 59-72

  Garceau, Mathieu ^a   Vincent, Claude ^a,b   Robichaud, Line ^b  

^a CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aging; Focus groups; Home care; Seniors; Social participation; Telemonitoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; ELDERLY CARE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIOLOGY; TELEHEALTH; TELEMONITORING; AGED; AGING; CANADA; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FRAIL ELDERLY; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELECONSULTATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; FOCUS GROUPS; FRAIL ELDERLY; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUEBEC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REMOTE CONSULTATION;

EID: 34248677873     PISSN: 07149808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/9K55-32P0-RK25-T448     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Association canadienne des ergothérapeutes (1997). Promouvoir l'occupation: une perspective de l'ergothérapie. Ottawa, On: CAOT Publications ACE.
2. Bernstein, M. (2000). "Low-tech" personal emergency response systems reduce costs and improve outcomes. Managed Care Quarterly, 8(1), 38-43.
3. Bynum, H. et Rogers, J.C. (1987). The use and effectiveness of assistive devices possessed by patients seen in home care. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7(3), 181-191.
4. Conseil d'évaluation des technologies de la santé du Québec (CÉTS) (1998). Télésanté et télémédecine au Québec - État de la question. Montréal (CÉTS 1998-7 RF). Document rédigé par Pascale Lehoux.
5. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousant Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Davies, K.N. et Mulley, G.P. (1993). The view of elderly people on emergency alarm use. Clinical Rehabilitation, 7, 278-282.
7. Deslauriers, J.P. (1991). Recherche qualitative : guide pratique. Montréal, QC : McGraw-Hill.
8. Dibner, A.S. (1990). Personal emergency response systems: communication technology aids elderly and their families. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 9(4), 504-510.
9. Fougeyrollas, P., Cloutier, R., Bergeron, H., Côté, J. et St-Michel, G. (1998). Classification québécois - processsus de production du handicap. Lac St-Charles, QC : Réseau international sur le processus de production du handicap.
10. Garceau, M. (2004). La télésurveillance pour le maintien à domicile: la perception des personnes âgées, des proches aidants et des intervenants. Mémoire de maîtrise non publié, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec.
11. Hébert, R., Carrier, R. et Bilodeau, A. (1988). The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age / Ageing, 17, 293-302.
12. Kosh, J. (1984). Emergency response system assists in discharge planning. Dimension in Health Service, 61(11), 30-31.
13. Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational therapy, 45, 214-222.
14. Lewin Group. (2000). Assessment of approaches to evaluating telemedicine; http://aspe.hss.gov/health/reports/aaet (consulté le 9 juin 2003).
15. Mann, W.C., Marchant, T., Tomita, M., Fraas, L. et Stanton, K. (2002). Elder acceptance of health monitoring devices in the home. Care Management Journals, 3(2), 91-98.
16. Mann, W.C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M. et Charvat, B.A. (1995). The relationship of functional independance to assistive device use of elderly persons living at home. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 14(2), 225-247.
17. Manton, K.G., Corder, L. et Stallard, E. (1993). Changes in the use of personal assistance and special equipment from 1982 to 1989: Results from the 1982 and 1989 NLTCS. The Gerontologist, 33(2), 168-176.
18. Montgomery, C. (1992). Personal response systems in the United States. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 13(3/4), 201-222.
19. Morgan, D.L. (1995). Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 5(4), 516-523.
20. Mucchielli, A. (1996). Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris : Armand Collin.
21. Noreau, L., Fougeyrollas, P. et Vincent, C. (2002). The LIFE-H: Assessment of the quality of social participation. Technology and Disability, 14, 113-118.
22. Pape, T.L.-B., Kim, J. et Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 5-20.
23. Philips, B. et Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 36-45.
24. Pineault, R. et Daveluy, C. (1995). La planification de la santé. Concepts-méthodes-stratégies. Montréal, QC: Éditions Nouvelles.
25. QSR International (QSR International Pty Ltd.) 2005. http://www. qsrinternational.com/software.hrm (consulté le 23 février 2005).
26. Reed, K. et Sanderson, S. (1983). Concepts of Occupational Therapy (2d ed.). Baltimore, MA: Williams et Wilkins.
27. Roush, R.E. et Teasdale, T.A. (1997). Reduced hospitalisation rate of two sets of community-residing older adults after use of a personal response system. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 16(3), 355-366.
28. Roush, R.E., Teasdale, T.A., Murphy J.N. et Kirk, M.S. (1995). Impact of a personnal emergency response system on hospital utilization by community-residing elders. Journal of the Southern Medical Association, 88(9), 917-922.
29. Ruchlin, H.S. et Morris, J.N. (1981). Cost-benefit analysis of an emergency alarm and response system: A case study of a long-term care program. Health Service Research, 16, 65-80.
30. Scherer, M.J. (1996). Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(9), 439-448.
31. Sherwood, S. et Morris, J.N. (1981). A study of the effects of an emergency alarm and response system for the aged: A final report. Boston, MA: Department of Social Gerontological Research, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for the Aged.
32. Stowe, J. et Chamberlain, M.A. (1980). Aids for arthritics: Report of a survey on aids supplied postally by the British Rheumatism Association. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 80-84.
33. Stowe, J., Thornely, G., Chamberlain, M.A. et Wright, V. (1982). Aids and equipment for bathing survey II. Leeds: Rheumatism Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Leeds.
34. Teng, E.L. et Chui, H.C. (1987). The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314-318.
35. Tinker, A. (1992). Alarms and telephones in emergency response - research from the United Kingdom. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 13(3/4), 177-198.
36. Vincent, C., Reinharz, D., Deaudelin, I., Garceau, M. et Talbot, L.R. (2006). Public telemonitoring service for frail elderly living at home, outcomes and evolution: A quasi experimental design with two follow-ups. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(41); www.hqlo. com (consulté le 7 juillet 2006).
37. Vincent, C. et Morin, G. (1999). L'utilisation ou non des aides techniques: comparaison d'un modèle américain aux besoins de la réalité québécoise. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(2), 92-101.