Evaluation of a new coprocessed compound based on lactose and maize starch for tablet formulation

AAPS Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Hauschild, Karsten ^a   Picker Freyer, Katharina M ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Compression; Drug release; Lactose; Starch; Tableting behavior

Indexed keywords

LACTOSE; STARCH; THEOPHYLLINE; EXCIPIENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DESICCATION; DRUG MIXTURE; DRUG RELEASE; FLOW KINETICS; FORCE; MAIZE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PLASTICITY; PRESSURE; RELATIVE DENSITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TABLET DISINTEGRATION TIME; TABLET FORMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; CHEMISTRY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; POROSITY; POWDER; TABLET;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; EXCIPIENTS; LACTOSE; POROSITY; POWDERS; PRESSURE; STARCH; TABLETS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 34248676288     PISSN: 15507416     EISSN: 15221059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1208/ps060216     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Picker KM. Soft tableting: A new concept to tablet pressure-sensitive drugs. Pharm Dev Technol. 2004;9(1):107-121.
2. Picker KM. New Insights in the Process of Tablet Formation: Ways to Explore Soft Tableting. [Habilitationsschrift]. Halle, Germany: Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg and Görich und Weiershäuser Verlag, Marburg; 2002.
3. Meggle AG. Technical information at www.meggle-pharma.de/en/products/uebersicht/starlac.
4. Vromans H, Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF. Studies on tableting properties of lactose. VI. Consolidation and compaction of spray-dried amorphous lactose. Acta Pharm Suec. 1986;23:231-240.
5. Vromans H, de Boer AH, Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF, Kussendrager KD. Studies on tableting properties of lactose. I. The effect of initial particle size on binding properties and dehydration characteristics of lactose. Acta Pharm Suec. 1985;22:163-172.
6. Goto K, Sunada H, Danjo K, Yonezawa Y. Pharmaceutical evaluation of multipurpose excipients for direct compressed tablet manufacture: comparisons of the capabilities of multipurpose excipients with those in general use. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999;425:869-878.
7. Bolhuis GK, Chowhan ZT. Lactose. In: Alderborn G, Nyström C, eds. Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1996:459-478.
8. Paronen P, Juslin M. Compressional characteristics of four starches. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1983;35:627-635.
9. Bos CE, Bolhuis GK, van Doome H, Lerk CF. Native starch in tablet formulations: properties on compaction. Pharm Weekbl Sc Ed. 1987;9:274-282.
10. Heckel RW. Density-pressure relationship in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME. 1961;221:671-675.
11. Walker EE. The influence of the velocity of compression on the apparent compressibility of powders. Trans Faraday Soc. 1923;19:614-622.
12. Cooper AR, Eaton LE. Compaction behavior of several ceramic powders. J Am Ceram Soc. 1962;45:97-101.
13. Kawakita K, Lüdde KH. Some considerations on powder compression equations. Powder Technol. 1971;4:61-68.
14. Sønnergaard JM. Investigation of a new mathematical model for compression of pharmaceutical powders. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2001;14:149-157.
15. Dietrich R, Mielck JB. Parametrisierung des zeitlichen Verlaufs der Verdichtung bei der Tablettierung mit Hilfe der modifizierten Weibull-Funktion: 1.Mitt.: Gedanklicher und experimenteller Ansatz. Pharm Ind. 1984;46:863-869.
16. Dietrich R, Mielck JB. Parametrisierung des zeitlichen Verlaufs der Verdichtung bei der Tablettierung mit Hilfe der modifizierten Weibull-Funktion: 2.Mitt.: Auswertung und Interpretation der Ergebnisse. Pharm Ind. 1985;47:216-220.
17. Fraser RDB, Suzuki E. Resolution of overlapping hands, functions for simulating band shapes. Anal Chem. 1969;41:37-39.
18. Picker KM. The 3-D Model: Comparison of Parameters Obtained From and by Simulating Different Tableting Machines. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003; 4(3):E35.
19. Kurup TRR, Pilpel N. Compression characteristics of pharmaceutical powder mixtures. Powder Technol. 1978;19:147-155.
20. Heckel RW. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metall Soc AIME. 1961;221:1001-1008.
21. Sønnergaard JM. A critical evaluation of the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm. 1999;193:63-71.
22. Sønnergaard JM. Impact of particle density and initial volume on mathematical compression models. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000;11:307-315.
23. Dietrich R, Mielck JB. Eignung der Weibull-Funktion zur Charakterisierung des zeitabhängigen Verformungsverhaltens von Tablettierhilfistoffen. Acta Pharm Technol. 1985;31:67-76.
24. Picker KM. Hydrophile Matrixtabletten: Tablettierung und Freisetzung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der relativen Feuchte während der Herstellung [Dissertation]. Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg; 1995.
25. Picker KM. The 3-D Model: Does Time Plasticity Represent the Influence of Tableting Speed? AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4(4):E66.
26. Armstrong NA, Haines-Nutt RF. Elastic recovery and surface area changes in compacted powders systems. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1972;24(suppl):135P-136P.
27. Koch HP. Die Technik der Dissolutionsbestimmung (2.Teil). Pharm Acta Helv. 1984;59:130-139.
28. Kibbe AH, Weller PJ. Lactose. In: Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ, eds. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. London, UK: Pharmaceutical Press; 2003:323-332.
29. Rowley G. Starch. In: Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ, eds. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. London, UK: Pharmaceutical Press; 2003:601-608.