Comparison of the MURA and an improved single-receptor (SIRA) trajectory source apportionment (TSA) method using artificial sources

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 41, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 4466-4481

  Lee, Stephanie ^a   Ashbaugh, Lowell ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

HYSPLIT; MURA; Residence time analysis; Source apportionment; Trajectory analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROBABILITY; SULFUR;

HYSPLIT; RESIDENCE TIME ANALYSIS; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS;

TRAJECTORIES;

SULFUR;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; POLLUTANT SOURCE; POLLUTION MONITORING; PROBABILITY; RESIDENCE TIME; TRAJECTORY;

ACCURACY; AIR PARTICLE CONTROL; AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; GEOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

EID: 34248672550     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.043     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AirData: Access to Air Pollution Data, 〈http://www.epa.gov/air/data/〉 (accessed June 2005).
2. ARL Gridded Meteorological Data Archives, 〈http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ss/transport/archives.html〉 (accessed 2004).
3. Ashbaugh L.L., Malm W.C., and Sadeh W.Z. A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at Grand Canyon National Park. Atmospheric Environment 19 8 (1985) 1263-1270
4. Gebhart K.A., Schichtel B.A., and Barna M.G. Directional biases in back trajectories caused by model and input data. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 55 (2005) 1649-1662
5. Hsu Y., Holsen T., and Hopke P.K. Locating and quantifying sources in Chicago: receptor modeling and field sampling. Environmental Science and Technology 37 4 (2003) 681-690
6. Hsu Y., Holsen T., and Hopke P.K. Comparison of hybrid receptor models to locate PCB source in Chicago. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 545-562
7. HYSPLIT_4, 2003. NOAA ARL HYSPLIT Model, 〈http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html〉 (accessed 2003).
8. Keeler G.J., and Samson P.J. Spatial representativeness of trace element ratios. Environmental Science and Technology 23 11 (1989) 1358-1364
9. Lee S., and Ashbaugh L. Comparison of multi-receptor and single-receptor trajectory source apportionment (TSA) methods using artificial sources. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 1119-1127
10. Lui W., Hopke P.K., Han Y., Yi S., Holsen T.M., Cybart S., Kozlowski K., and Milligan M. Application of receptor modeling to atmospheric constituents at Potsdam and Stockton NY. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 4997-5007
11. Malm W.C., Sisler J.F., Huffman D., Eldred R.A., and Cahill T.A. Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 D1 (1994) 1347-1370
12. Seibert P., Kromp-Kolb H., Baltensperger U., Jost D.T., Schwikowski M., Kasper A., and Puxbaum H. Trajectory analysis of aerosol measurements at High Alpine Sites. In: Borrell P.M., Borrell P., Cvitas T., and Seiler W. (Eds). Transport and Transformation of Pollutants in the Troposphere (1994), Academic Publishing, Den Haag 689-693
13. Stohl A. Trajectory statistics-a new method to establish source-receptor relationships of air pollutants and its application to the transport of particulate sulfate if Europe. Atmospheric Environment 30 4 (1996) 579-587
14. Yli-Tuomi T., Hopke P.K., Paatero P., Basunia M.S., Landsberger S., Viisanen Y., and Paatero J. Atmospheric aerosol over finnish artic: source analysis by the multilinear engine and the potential source contribution function. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 4381-4392
15. Zeng Y., and Hopke P.P. A study of the sources of acid precipitation in Ontario, Canada. Atmospheric Environment 23 (1989) 1499-1509
16. Zhou L., Hopke P.K., and Liu W. Comparison of two trajectory bases models for locating particle sources for two rural New York sites. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 1955-1963