A rulebase physiographic characterization a drought prone watershed applying remote sensing and GIS

Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 189-201

  Arun, P S ^a   Jana, R ^a   Nathawat, M S ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

^b BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248671022     PISSN: 0255660X     EISSN: 09743006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02990035     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Allen, C.G., Andres, C. and Sheldon, M.L. (2001). Developing a geomorphic approach for ranking watersheds for rehabilitation, Zuni Indian reservation, New Mexico. Geomorphology, 37(1-2): 105-134.
2. Band, L.E. (1986). Topographic partition of watershed with digital elevation models. Water Resour. Research, 22(1): 15-24.
3. Biswas, S., Sudhakar, S. and Desai, V.R. (2002). Remote sensing and Geographic Information System based approach for watershed conservation. J. Surveying Engg., 128(3): 108-124.
4. Fluegel, W.A. (1995). Hydrological response units (HRUs) to preserve basin heterogeneity in hydrological modelling using PRMS/MMS-case study in the Brol basin, Germany. Proc. XXI General Assembly of Int. union of Geodesy and Geophysics. Monograph Title: Modelling and Management of Sustainable Basin-scale Water Resour. System, held at Boulder, CO, USA from Jul. 1-14, 1995. Publication oflnt. Asso. of Hydrological Sci., no. 231:79-87.
5. Hernandez, M., Miller, S.N., Goodrich, D.C., Gofl, B.F., Kepner, W.G., Edmonds, C.M. and Jones, K.B. (2000). Modelling runoff response to land cover and rainfall spatial variability in semi-arid watersheds. Environ. Monitoring and Assessment, 64(1): 285-298.
6. Kumar, P., Kumar, S. and Manchanda, ML. (2004). Satellite stereo data for DEM surfaces and derivatives. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 32(1): 81-90.
7. Jenson, S.K. and Domingue, J.O. (1988). Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogramm. Engg. and Remote Sensing, 54(11): 1593-1600.
8. Martz, L.W. and Garbrecht, J. (1992). Numerical definition of drainage network and the sub-catchment areas from digital elevation models. Computers and Geosciences, 18(6): 747-761.
9. Saxena, R.K., Verma, I.S., Chary, CtR., Srivastava, R. and Barthwal, A. K. (2000). IRS-1C data application in watershed characterization and management. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 21 (17): 3197-3208.
10. Suzen, M.L. and Toprak, V. (1998). Filtering of satellite images in geological lineament analyses: an application to a fault zone in central Turkey. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 19(6): 1101-1114.
11. Turcotte, R., Fortin, J.P., Rousseau, A.N., Massicotte. S. and Villeneuve, J.P. (2001). Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using a digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network. J. Hydrology, 240(3-4): 225-242.
12. Vogt, J.V., Colombo, R. and Bertolo, F. (2003). Deriving drainage networks and catchment boundaries: a new methodology combining digital elevation data and environmental characteristics. Geomorphology, 53(3-4): 281-298.