Mucous membrane of the rumen of ovines, fed with spineless, forrage cactus or palm (barbary fig) (Opuntia ficus indica Mil): Hystochemical study by means of light microscopy;Membrana mucosa del rumen de ovinos, alimentados con forraje de cactus sin espinas o palmeras (barbary fig) (Opuntia ficus indica Mil): Estudio histoquímico por medio de microscopía de luz

International Journal of Morphology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 723-728

  Neiva, Gentileza Santos Martins ^a   Da Mota, Diógenes Luís ^b   Batista, Ângela Maria Vieira ^c   De Sousa Rodrigues, Célio Fernando ^a,d  

^a Department of Morphology   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ALAGOAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Forrage cactus; Forrage palm; Histochemistry; Histology; Mucous membrane; Ovine

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248670853     PISSN: 07179367     EISSN: 07179502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022006000500034     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. nd. ed. Manole, Rio de Janeiro,1992. pp. 439-54.
2. Baker, G.; Jones, L. H. P. & Wardrop, I. D.Opal phytoliths and mineral particles in the rumen of the streep. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 12:462-72, 1961.
3. Brownlee, A. The development of rumen papilae in cattle fed on different diets. The British Veterinary J., 112, (9):369-75, 1956.
4. Bull, L. S.; Bush, L. J.; Friend, J. D.; Harris, Jr., B. & Jones, E. W. Incidence of ruminal parakeratosis in calves fed different ration and its relation to volatile fatty acid absorption.J. ofDairy Science, 48(11):1459-66, 1965.
5. Carvalho,A. D.V.;Rangel,N. M. & Vignoli,V. V. Histochemistryof glicoproteins in the gastric epithelium of the fundic and body region of Dasypus novemcinctus.Rev.Brasileirade Pesquisas Médicas e Biológicas, 8:109-17, 1975.
6. Carvalho, A. D. V. ; Magalhães, M. J. & Moreira, M. C. Aspectoshistológicos, histopatológicose histoquímicos de mucinas do epitélio gástrico da regiãopilórica de Philanderopossum. Rev.Bras. Cs. Morfol., 4:111-4, 1987.
7. Carvalho, A. D.V.; Magalhães, M. J. & Filho, J. S.A. Histologia, histopatologia e histoquímica demucinas dofundoedocorpodoestômagoemPhilanderopossum . Rev.Bras. Cs. Morfol., 6:38-42, 1989.
8. Fisher, E. R. & Lillie, R. D. Effect of methylation on basophilia. J. Histochemistry and cytochemistry, 2: 18, 1954.
9. Gemmel, R. T. & Engelhardt, W. V. The structure of the cells lining of the stomach of the Tammar Wallby (Macropus engenii). J. Anat., 123:723-33, 1977.
10. Harrison, H. N.; Warner, R. G.; Sander, E. G.; Loosli, J. K. Changes in the tissue and volume of the stomachs of calves following the removal of dry feed or consumption of inert bulk. J. DairyScience, 43:1301-12, 1960.
11. Junqueira, L. C. & Carneiro, J. Histologia básica. 8 ed. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, 1990.
12. Krause, W. J.; Cutts, J. H. & LE, C. R. The postnatal development of the alimentary canal in the opossum. II. Stomach. J. Anat., 122:499-519, 1976.
13. Lev, R. & Spicer, S. S. Specific staining of sulphate groups with alcian blue at low pH. J. Histochemistry and cytochemistry, 12:309, 1964.
14. Lillie, R. D. & Fullmer, H. M. Histopathologic technic and practical histochemistry. Mc-Grac Hill Book Company, 1976.
15. a. ed. Grathier-Villars, 1960.
16. McManus, J. F. A. Histological demonstration of mucin after periodic acid.Nature, 158:202, 1946.
17. McManus, J. F. A. & Cason, J. E. Carbohydrate histochemistry studied by acetylation techniques. I. Exp. med., 91:651-4, 1950.
18. Neiva, G. S. M. Teores de ácidos graxos voláteis no líquido ruminal; histologia e histoquímica da mucosa do estômago de ovinos recebendo palma forrageira (Opuntia fícus indica Mill).1996. 49p. Dissertação de Mestrado-Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Brasil.
19. Orskov, E. R. Starch digestion and utilization in ruminants.J. ofAnimalScience, 63:1624-33, 1986.
20. Sander, E. G.; Warner, R. G.; Harrison, H. N. & Loosli J. K.Thestimulatoryeffect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionateon the development of rumen mucosa in theyoungcalf.J. Dairy Science, 42:1600-5, 1959.
21. Sheahan,D.G.& Jervis, H. R. Comparative histochemistry ofgastrointestinal mucosubstances.Am. J. of Anat., 146:103-32, 1976.
22. Smithson, F. Grass opal in british soils.The J. of Soil Science, 9:48-55, 1958.
23. Spicer, S. S. Correlative study of the histochemicalproperties of rodent acid mucopolysaccharides. J. Histochemistry, 8:18-34, 1960.
24. Stinson, A. L. W. & Calhoun, M. L. Sistema digestivo.In: Delman, H. D. & Brown, E. M. Histologia Veterinária. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, 1982. pp. 164 - 211.
25. Sutton, J. D.; McGilliard, A. D. & Jacobson, N. L.Functional development of rumen mucosa. I. Absorptive ability. J. of Dairy Science, 46:426-36, 1963.
26. Tamate, H.; McGilliard, A. D.; Jacobson, N. L.; Getty, R.Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf.J. of Dairy Science, 45(3)408-9, 1962.
27. van Soest, P. J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2a. ed. Copyright: Cornell University, 1994. p. 476.
28. Wardrop, I. D. Some preliminary observations on the histological development of the forestomachs of the lamb; the effects of diet on the histological development of the fore stomachs of the Janm. during post-natal life. J. of Dairy Science, 57:343-9, 1961.
29. Willems, G. & Gerard, D. Étude histochimiquecomparée desglycoprotéines et polysaccharides intracellulaires de I'eptheliumet desgladesgastriques chez I'homme et chezdiversesespécies animales.Acta Gastro-Enterologica,32:211-25, 1969.