Middleware-induced styles for enterprise application integration

Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 334-337

  Giesecke, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; MAINTENANCE; MIDDLEWARE; REENGINEERING;

ARCHITECTURAL STYLES; ENTERPRISE APPLICATION INTEGRATION (EAI); EUROPEAN; FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; MIDDLEWARE PLATFORMS; PHD PROJECT; SELECTION PROCESSES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 34248668027     PISSN: 15345351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSMR.2006.33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. L. Baresi, R. Heckel, S. Thöne, and D. Varro. Style-based refinement of dynamic software architectures. In Proceedings of the Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'04), page 155. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
2. E. Di Nitto and D. Rosenblum. Exploiting ADLs to specify architectural styles induced by middleware infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, pages 13-22. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999.
3. W. Emmerich, E. Ellmer, and H. Fieglein. Tigra - an architectural style for enterprise application integration. In ICSE '01: Proceedings of the 23 rd International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 567-576, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
4. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Standard Architecture for Healthcare Information Systems, 2004. ENV 12967.
5. D. Garlan and M. Shaw. An introduction to software architecture. In V. Ambriola and G. Tortora, editors, Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pages 1-39, Singapore, 1993. World Scientific Publishing Company.
6. W. Hasselbring. Information system integration. Commun. ACM, 43(6):32-38, 2000.
7. W. Hasselbring, R. Reussner, H. Jaekel, J. Schlegelmilch, T. Teschke, and S. Krieghoff. The dublo architecture pattern for smooth migration of business information systems: An experience report. In ICSE '04: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 117-126, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.
8. IBM. WebSphere MQ Version 6.0, 2005. http: //www-306.ibm.com/ software/integration/wmq/v60/.
9. IEEE. IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, 2000. IEEE Standard 1471-2000.
10. R. Kazman, J. Asundi, and M. Klein. Quantifying the costs and benefits of architectural decisions. In ICSE '01: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 297-306, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
11. R. Kazman, J. Asundi, and M. Klein. Making architecture design decisions: An economic approach. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-035, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.
12. A. Kelkar and R. Gamble. Analysis of architectural characteristics to predict interoperability problems. Technical Report TR-99-15, University of Tulsa, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, 1999.
13. A. Kelkar and R. Gamble. Understanding the architectural characteristics behind middleware choices. In Proc. 1st International Conference in Information Reuse and Integration, 1999.
14. K. Kontogiannis, D. Smith, and L. O'Brien. On the role of services in enterprise application integration. In STEP '02: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice, page 103, Washington, DC, USA, 2002. IEEE Computer Society.
15. P. Kruchten. The 4+1 view model of architecture. IEEE Softw., 12(6):42-50, 1995.
16. R. Land and I. Crnkovic. Software systems integration and architectural analysis - a case study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, page 338. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
17. M. W. Maier, D. Emery, and R. Hilliard. Software architecture: Introducing IEEE Standard 1471. Computer, 34(4): 107-109, 2001.
18. N. Medvidovic. On the role of middleware in architecturebased software development. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, pages 299-306. ACM Press, 2002.
19. N. Medvidovic, E. M. Dashofy, and R. N. Taylor. The role of middleware in architecture-based software development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 13(4):367-393, 2003.
20. N. Medvidovic, D. S. Rosenblum, and R. N. Taylor. A language and environment for architecture-based software development and evolution. In ICSE '99: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, pages 44-53, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1999. IEEE Computer Society Press.
21. M. Moore, R. Kazman, M. Klein, and J. Asundi. Quantifying the value of architecture design decisions: lessons from the field. In ICSE '03: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 557-562, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
22. Object Management Group. Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Core Specification 3.0.3, 2004. OMG Specification formal/2004-03-01.
23. J. Payton, R. Gamble, S. Kimsen, and L. Davis. The opportunity for formal models of integration. In Proc. 2nd International Conference in Information Reuse and Integration, 2000.
24. J. Ploski and S. Giesecke. When small outgrows beautiful - experiences from a development project. In Net.ObjectDays 2005, pages 367-380. tranSIT, 2005.
25. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software architecture: perspectives on an emerging discipline. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996.
26. Sun Microsystems. Java Platform, Enterprise Edition 5 (Java EE 5) Specification, 2005. JSR-000244, Proposed Final Draft.
27. R. N. Taylor, N. Medvidovic, K. M. Anderson, J. E. James Whitehead, J. E. Robbins, K. A. Nies, P. Oreizy, and D. L. Dubrow. A component- and message-based architectural style for GUI software. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 22(6):390-406, 1996.
28. A. Zarras. A comparison framework for middleware infrastructures. Journal of Object Technology, 3(5): 103-123, 2004.