Comparison of Two Within-Household Selection Methods in a Telephone Survey of Substance Abuse and Dependence

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 458-463

  Beebe, Timothy J ^a   Davern, Michael E ^a   McAlpine, Donna D ^a   Ziegenfuss, Jeanette K ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Data Collection; Epidemiologic Methods; Interviews; Random Digit Dialing; Sampling Studies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MENTAL HEALTH; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; SCREENING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TECHNIQUE; TELEPHONE;

DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 34248656987     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.031     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Gaziano C. Comparative analysis of within-household respondent selection techniques. Public Opin Q 69 (2005) 124-157
2. Kish L. A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. J Am Stat Assoc 44 (1949) 380-387
3. Rizzo L., Brick J.M., and Park I. A minimally intrusive method for sampling persons in random digit dial surveys. Public Opin Q 68 (2004) 267-274
4. American Association of Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) [homepage on the Internet]. Survey Methods, Standards and Best Practices. Available from: http://www.aapor.org/standards.asp. Accessed February 12, 2007.
5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
6. Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., and Williams J.B. The patient health questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care 41 (2003) 1284-1292
7. Kessler R.C., Barker P.R., Colpe L.J., Epstein J.F., Gfroerer J.C., Hiripi E., et al. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60 (2003) 184-189
8. McAlpine D.D., Beebe T., McCoy K., and Davern M. Estimating the Need for Treatment for Substance Abuse Among Adults in Minnesota: 2004/2005 Minnesota Treatment Needs Assessment Survey Final Report (2005), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
9. Lind K, Link M, Oldendick R. A comparison of the accuracy of last birthday versus the next birthday methods for random selection of household respondents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR, 2000.
10. Curtin R., Presser S., and Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q 69 (2005) 87-98
11. Longstreth M, Shields T. A comparison of within household random selection methods for random digit dial surveys. Presented at the 60th annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, Florida, May 12-15, 2005.
12. Binson D., Canchola J.A., and Catania J.A. Random selection in a national telephone survey: A comparison of the Kish, next birthday, and last birthday methods. J Off Stat 16 (2000) 53-59
13. Lavrakas PJ, Traugott MW. Survey research using experimental design. Forthcoming in the Sage Publication Series. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.