3D digital subtraction angiography of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison of flat panel detector with conventional image intensifier TV system using a vascular phantom

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 839-843

  Kakeda, S ^a,c   Korogi, Y ^a   Ohnari, N ^a   Hatakeyama, Y ^a   Moriya, J ^a   Oda, N ^a   Nishino, K ^b   Miyamoto, W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

^b SHIMADZU CORPORATION   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FLAT PANEL DETECTOR; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; PHANTOM; RADIOLOGIST;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTIFACTS; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34248646803     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;218:799-808
2. Tanoue S, Kiyosue H, Kenai H, et al. Three-dimensional reconstructed images after rotational angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm: surgical correlation. Neurosurgery 2000;47:866-71
3. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Macho J, et al. 3D angiography: clinical interest - first applications in interventional neuroradiology. J Neuroradiol 1998;25:251-62
4. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1545-52
5. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, et al. Pseudostenosis phenomenon at volume-rendered three-dimensional digital angiography of intracranial arteries: frequency, location, and effect on image evaluation. Radiology 2004;232:882-87
6. Adachi S, Hori N, Sato K, et al. Experimental evaluation of a-Se and CdTe flat-panel x-ray detectors for digital radiography and fluoroscopy. Proc SPIE 2000;3977:38-47
7. Rowlands JA, Hunter DM, Araj N. X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography. Med Rhys 1991;18:421-31
8. Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, Rabin CE. Principles of digital radiography with large area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 1999;210:595-99
9. Zhao W, Ji WG, Debrie A, et al. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. Med Rhys 2003;30:254-63
10. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Suginohara K, et al. Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1067-74
11. Marcus CD, Ladam-Marcus VJ, Bigot JL, et al. Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique. Radiology 1999;211:775-80