Asynaptic variations in induced autotetraploid of soybean

Cytologia

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 23-27

  Kumar, Girjesh ^a   Rai, Priyanka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD   (India)

Author keywords

Asynapsis; Autotetraploid; Glycine max; Meiotic behaviour

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX; SYNAPSIS;

EID: 34248638781     PISSN: 00114545     EISSN: 00114545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.72.23     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bione, N. C. P., Pagliarini, M. S. and Almeida, L. A. 2002a. An asynaptic mutation in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) associated with total absence of sister chromatid cohesiveness. Cytologia 67: 177-183.
2. _and _ 2002b. A new and distinctive male-sterile, female-fertile desynaptic mutant in soybean (Glycine max). Hereditas 136: 97-103.
3. Dawe, R. K. 1998. Meiotic chromosome organization and segregation in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant. Mol. Boil. 49: 371-395.
4. Franklin, A. E., McElver, J., Sunjevaric, I., Rothstein, R. and Borwen, B. 1999. Three dimensional microscopy of the Rad 51 recombination protein during meiotic prophase. Plant Cell 11: 809-824.
5. Gottschalk, W. and Kleine, H. D. 1976. The influence of mutated genes on sporogencsis. A survey on the genetic control of meiosis in Pisum sativum. Theor. Appl. Genetics 48: 23-34.
6. _ and Kaul, M. L. H. 1980a. Asynapsis and desynapsis in flowering plants. I. Asynapsis. Nucleus 23: 1-15.
7. _ and _ 1980b. Asynapsis and desynapsis in flowering plants. II. Desynapsis. Nucleus 23: 97-120.
8. Ji, Y. E., Stelly, D. M., Donato, M. D., Goodman, M. M. and Williams, C. G. 1999. A candidate recombination modifier gene for Zea mays L. Genetics 151: 821-830.
9. Khawaja, H. I. T. and Ellis, J. R. 1987. Colchicines induced desynaptic mutations in L. pratensis. Genome 29: 859-866.
10. _, Sybenga, J. and Ellis, J. R. 1998. Meiosis in aneuploids of tetraploid Lathyrus odoratus and L. pratensis. Heredits 129: 53-57.
11. Kumar, G. and Sharma, V. 2001. Induced desynapsis in Cicer Arietinum L. J. Cytol. Genet. 2 (NS): 123-127.
12. _ and Singh, V. 2002. Desynaptic variation in barley. J. Cytol. Genet. 3 (NS): 127-131.
13. Lacadena, J. R. 1965. Partial failing of meiotic pairing in a nullisomic plant of Aegilops triaristata Willd. 6x. Chrom. Inf. Serv. 6: 4.
14. Palmer, R. G. and Horner, H. T. 2000. Genetics and cytology of a genie male-sterile mutant form a transposon-containing soybean population. J. Hered. 91: 378-383.
15. Peirson, B. N., Bowling, S. E. and Makaroff, C. A. 1997. A defect in synapsis causes male sterility in a T-DNA-tagged Arabidopsis thaliana mutant. Plant J. 11: 659-669.
16. Rao, K. G. R. and Kumar, O. A. 1983. Cytogenetics of a spontaneous desynaptic mutant in Chillies (Capsicum annum L). Cytologia 48: 195-199.
17. Rao, S. R. and Kumar, A. 2003. Cytological investigations in a desynaptic variant of Anogeissus sericea var. sericea, an important hardwood tree of Rajasthan. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 142: 103-110.
18. Reddi, T. V. V. and Rao, D. R. M. 2000. Cytology of induced desynaptic mutant in rice. Cytologia 65: 35-41.
19. Rees, H. 1961. Genotypic control of chromosome form and behaviour. Bot. Rev. 27: 288-318.
20. Simchen, G. and Stamberg, J. 1969. Fine and coarse controls of genetic recombination. Nature 222: 329-332.
21. 6 of Urd and its relation to fertility. Sabrao J. 18: 89-96.
22. Singh, S. and Gupta, P. K. 1981. Desynapsis in Zinnia haegeana L. Cytologia 46: 63-67.