Continuous hydrogen production by anaerobic mixed microflora using a hollow-fiber microfiltration membrane bioreactor

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 950-957

  Lee, Kuo Shing ^a   Lin, Ping Jei ^b   Fangchiang, Kai ^b   Chang, Jo Shu ^c  

^a CENTRAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fermentative hydrogen production; Fructose; Glucose; Hollow fiber microfiltration membrane; Membrane bioreactor; Mixed culture; Sucrose

Indexed keywords

DILUTION; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; STOICHIOMETRY; SUGAR (SUCROSE);

FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; HOLLOW FIBER MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES; MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; MIXED CULTURE;

BIOREACTORS;

EID: 34248637608     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Levin D.B., Pitt L., and Love M. Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29 (2004) 173-185
2. Das D., and Veziroglu T.N. Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. Int J Hydrogen Energy 26 (2001) 13-28
3. Horiuchi J., Shimizu T., Kanno T., and Kobayashi M. Dynamic behavior in response to pH shift during anaerobic acidogenesis with a chemstat culture. Biotech Tech 13 (1999) 155-157
4. Chen C.C., Lin C.Y., and Chang J.S. Kinetics of hydrogen production with continuous anaerobic cultures utilizing sucrose as the limiting substrate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57 (2001) 56-64
5. Fang H.H.P., and Liu H. Effect of pH on hydrogen production from glucose by a mixed culture. Bioresour Technol 82 (2002) 87-93
6. Zhang J.J., Li X.Y., Oh S.E., and Logan B.E. Physical and hydrodynamic properties of flocs produced during biological hydrogen production. Biotechnol Bioeng 88 7 (2004) 854-860
7. Fan K.S., Kan N.R., and Lay J.J. Effect of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic hydrogenesis in CSTR. Bioresour Technol 97 1 (2006) 84-89
8. Yokoi H., Tokushige T., Hirose J., Hayashi S., and Takasaki Y. Hydrogen production by immobilized cells of aciduric Enterobacter aerogenes strain HO-39. J Ferment Bioeng 83 (1997) 481-484
9. Kumar N., and Das D. Continuous hydrogen production by immobilized Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08 using lignocellulosic materials as solid matrices. Enzyme Microb Technol 29 (2001) 280-287
10. Rachman M.A., Nakashimada Y., Kakizono T., and Nishio N. Hydrogen production with high yield and high evolution rate by self-flocculated cells of Enterobacter aerogenes in a packed-bed reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49 (1998) 450-454
11. Chang J.S., Lee K.S., and Lin P.J. Biohydrogen production with fixed-bed bioreactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002) 1167-1174
12. 2 production with anaerobic sludge using activated-carbon supported packed-bed bioreactors. Biotechnol Lett 25 (2003) 133-138
13. Wu S.Y., Lin C.N., and Chang J.S. Hydrogen production with immobilized sewage sludge in three-phase fluidized-bed bioreactors. Biotechnol Prog 19 (2003) 828-832
14. Wu S.Y., Hung C.H., Lin C.N., Chen H.W., Lee A.S., and Chang J.S. Fermentative hydrogen production and bacterial community structure in high-rate anaerobic bioreactors containing silicone-immobilized and self-flocculated sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 93 5 (2006) 934-946
15. Lee K.S., Wu J.F., Lo Y.S., Lo Y.C., Lin P.J., and Chang J.S. Anaerobic hydrogen production with an efficient carrier-induced granular sludge bed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 87 5 (2004) 648-657
16. Lee K.S., Lo Y.S., Lo Y.C., Lin P.J., and Chang J.S. Operation strategies for biohydrogen production with a high-rate anaerobic granular sludge bed bioreactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 35 6-7 (2004) 605-612
17. Lee K.S., Lin P.J., and Chang J.S. Temperature effects on biohydrogen production in a granular sludge bed induced by activated carbon carriers. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31 4 (2006) 465-472
18. Lee KS, Lo YC, Lin PJ, Chang JS. Improving biohydrogen production in a carrier-induced granular sludge bed by altering physical configuration and agitation pattern of the bioreactor, Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006 [in press, available online at www.sciencedirect.com].
19. Chang F.Y., and Lin C.Y. Biohydrogen production using an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29 (2004) 33-39
20. Wen C., Huang X., and Qian Y. Domestic wastewater treatment using an anaerobic bioreactor coupled with membrane filtration. Process Biochem 35 (1999) 335-340
21. Gander M., Jefferson B., and Judd S. Aerobic, MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep Purif Technol 18 (2000) 119-130
22. Ma H., Brwman C.N., and Davis R.H. Membrane fouling reduction by backpulsing and surface modification. J Membr Sci 173 (2000) 191-200
23. Oh S.E., Iyer P., Bruns M.A., and Logan B.E. Biological hydrogen production using a membrane bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 87 1 (2004) 119-127
24. Chen C.C., Lin C.Y., and Lin M.C. Acid-base enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58 (2002) 224-228
25. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. New York: American Public Health Association; 1995.
26. Hawkes F.R., Dinsdale R., Hawkes D.L., and Hussy I. Sustainable fermentative hydrogen production: challenges for process optimization. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002) 1339-1347
27. Yu H.Q., Zhu Z.H., Hu W.R., and Zhang H.S. Hydrogen production from rice winery wastewater in an upflow anaerobic reactor by using mixed anaerobic cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002) 1359-1365