Do NHS clinicians and members of the public share the same views about reducing inequalities in health?

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 64, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2499-2503

  Tsuchiya, Aki ^a   Dolan, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Distributional preferences; Efficiency equity trade off; General public; NHS clinicians; UK

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH SURVEY; LIFE EXPECTANCY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TRADE-OFF;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL CLASS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL CLASS; STATE MEDICINE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34248637601     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Anand P., and Wailoo A. Utilities versus rights to publicly provided goods: Arguments and evidence from health care rationing. Economica 268 67 (2000) 543-578
2. Black D. Inequalities of health: The black report (1980), DHSS, London
3. Dolan, P., Edlin, R., Tsuchiya, A., & Wailoo, A. (2007). It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it: Characteristics of procedural justice and their importance in social decision-making. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming.
4. Dolan P., Shaw R., Tsuchiya A., and Williams A. QALY maximisation and people's preferences: A methodological review of the literature. Health Economics 14 (2005) 197-208
5. Dolan, P., Tsuchiya, A., Smith, P., Shaw, R., & Williams, A. (2002). Determining the parameters in a social welfare function using stated preference data: An application to health: Sheffield Health Economics Group Discussion Paper.
6. Farrar S., Ryan M., Ross D., and Ludbrook A. Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: An application to clinical service developments. Social Science & Medicine 50 1 (2000) 63-75
7. Neuberger J., Adams D., MacMaster P., Maidment A., and Speed M. Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: Survey of public and clinicians. British Medical Journal 317 7152 (1998) 172-175
8. NICE. (2005). Social value judgements: Principles for the development of NICE guidance. 〈http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=283494〉 (accessed 22 August 06).
9. NICE. (2006). Report on NICE Citizens Council Meeting, 8-10 June 2006. Inequalities in Health. 〈http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=355633〉.
10. Oliver A., Healey A., and Le_Grand J. Addressing health inequalities. Lancet 360 (2002) 565-567
11. Shaw, R., Dolan, P., Tsuchiya, A., Williams, A., Smith, P., & Burrows, R. (2001). Development of a questionnaire to elicit public preferences regarding health inequalities. Center for Health Economics, University of York.
12. Williams A., Dolan P., and Tsuchiya A. Eliciting equity-efficiency trade offs in health. In: Smith P.C., Ginnelly L., and Sculpher M. (Eds). Health policy and economics: Opportunities and Challenges (2005), Open University Press