Proposals for a practical system of significance evaluation in archaeological heritage management

European Journal of Archaeology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 177-199

  Deeben, Jos ^a,c   Groenewoudt, Bert J ^a,c   Hallewas, Daan P ^a,c   Willems, Willem J H ^b,c  

^a Dutch State Archaeological Service   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ROB ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Archaeological heritage management; Netherlands; Selection; Valuation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248636034     PISSN: 14619571     EISSN: 17412722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146195719900200203     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. BLOEMERS, T., 1997. Landschaftsarchäologie und Raumordnung in den Niederlanden. Aktuelle Trends und Themen. Archäologisches Nachrichtenblatt 2:229-243.
2. BRIUER, L. and C. MATHERS, 1996. Trends and Patterns in Cultural Resource Significance: an Historical Perspective and Annotated Bibliography. Alexandria: US Army Corps of Engineers Virginia (IWR Report 96-EL-1).
3. COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1992. European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (revised). European Treaty Series, 143. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
4. DARVILL, T., 1995. Value systems in archaeology. In M.A. Cooper, A. Firth, J. Carman and D. Wheatley (eds), Managing Archaeology: 40-50. London and New York: Routledge.
5. DARVILL, T., S. BURROW and D.-A. WILDGUST, 1995. Planning for the Past, Volume 2. An Assessment of Archaeological Assessments, 1982-1991, Bournemouth and London: Bournemouth University and English Heritage.
6. DARVILL, T. and A.K. FULTON, 1998: MARS: The Monuments At Risk Survey in England, 1995. Main Report. Bournemouth and London: Bournemouth University and English Heritage.
7. DARVILL, T., A. SAUNDERS and B. STARTIN, 1987. A question of national importance: approaches to the evaluation of ancient monuments for the monuments protection programme in England. Antiquity 61:393-408.
8. DEEBEN, J., D.P. HALLEWAS, J. KOLEN and R. WIEMER, 1997. Beyond the crystal ball. Predictive modelling as a tool in archaeological heritage management and occupation history. In W.J.H. Willems, H. Kars and D.P. Hallewas (eds), Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands: 76-118. Assen/Amersfoort: Van Gorcum/Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.
9. GROENEWOUDT, B.J., 1994. Prospectie, waardering en selectie van archeologische vindplaatsen: een beleidsgerichte verkenning van middelen en mogelijkheden. Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten, 17. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.
10. GROENEWOUDT, B.J. and J.H.F. BLOEMERS, 1997. Dealing with significance: concepts, strategies and priorities for archaeological heritage management in the Netherlands. In W.J.H. Willems, H. Kars and D.P. Hallewas (eds), Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands: 119-172. Assen/Amersfoort: Van Gorcum/Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.
11. GROENEWOUDT, B.J. and R.C.G.M. LAUWERIER, 1997. Kennisatlas, stand van kennis en kennisleemten; een snelle inventarisatie. Interne Rapporten ROB, 33. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.
12. LEONE, M.P. and P.B. POTTER JR., 1992. Legitimation and the classification of archaeological sites. American Antiquity 57:137-145.
13. LIPE, W.D., 1984. Value and meaning in cultural resources. In H. Cleere (ed.) Approaches to the archaeological heritage: 1-11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. LÜNING, J., 1997. Landschaftsarchäologie in Deutschland, ein Programm. Archäologisches Nachrichtenblatt 2:277-285.
15. MACINNES, L. and C.R. WICKHAM-JONES, 1992. All Natural Things. Archaeology and the Green Debate. Oxbow Monograph, 21. Oxford: Oxbow.
16. MORATTO, M.J. and R.E. KELLY, 1978. Optimizing strategies for evaluating archaeological significance. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1:1-30.
17. NEUSTUPNY, E., 1991. Community areas of prehistoric farmers in Bohemia. Antiquity 65:332-347.
18. OLIVIER, A., 1996. Frameworks for our Past. A Review of Research Frameworks, Strategies and Perceptions. London: English Heritage.
19. REED, A.D., 1987. A technique for ranking prehistoric sites in terms of scientific significance. American Archaeology 6:127-130.
20. ROORDA, I.M. and R. WIEMER, 1992a. The Archis Project: towards a new national archaeological record for the Netherlands. In C.U. Larsen (ed.), Sites and Monuments. National Archaeological Records: 117-122. København: National Museum of Denmark.
21. ROORDA, I., and R. WIEMER, 1992b. Towards a new archaeological information system in the Netherlands. In G. Lock and J. Moffets (eds), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (BAR International Series 577): 85-88. Oxford: BAR.
22. SCHUYF, J., 1995. Heidens Nederland; Zichtbare overblijfselen van een niet-christelijk verleden. Utrecht: Matrijs.
23. STARTIN, B., 1993. Assessment of field remains. In J. Hunter and I. Ralston (eds), Archaeological Resource Management in the UK; an Introduction: 184-196. Stroud: Alan Sutton.
24. WAINWRIGHT, G.J., 1991. Exploring our Past, Strategies for the Archaeology of England. London: English Heritage.
25. WILLEMS, W.J.H., 1997. Archaeological heritage management in the Netherlands: past, present and future. In W.J.H. Willems, H. Kars and D.P. Hallewas (eds), Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands: 3-34. Assen/Amersfoort: Van Gorcum/Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.
26. WILLEMS, W.J.H., H. KARS and D.P. HALLEWAS (eds), 1997. Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands. Assen/Amersfoort: Van Gorcum/Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.
27. ZOETBROOD, P.A.M., M.J.G. MONTFORTS, I.M. ROORDA and R. WIEMER, 1997. Documenting the archaeological heritage. In W.J.H. Willems, H. Kars and D.P. Hallewas (eds), Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands: 330-345. Assen/Amersfoort: Van Gorcum/Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.