Divided cities in the 21st century: Challenging the importance of globalisation

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 13-31

  Kempen, Ronald ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Contingencies; Divided cities; Globalization; Neighbourhood change

Indexed keywords

GLOBALIZATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBANIZATION;

EID: 34248635416     PISSN: 15664910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-006-9064-3     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adams, J. S., & Gilder, K. S. (1976). Household location and intra-urban migration. In D. T. Herbert, & R. J. Johnston (Eds.), Social areas in cities, volume I: Spatial processes and form (pp. 159-192). London: Wiley.
2. Bailey, N., Barker, A., & MacDonald, K. (1995). Partnership agencies in British urban policy. London: UCL Press.
3. Ballard, R. (1990). Migration and kinship: The differential effect of marriage rules on the process of Punjabi migration to Britain. In C. Clark, C. Peach, & S. Vertovec (Eds.), South Asians overseas: Migration and ethnicity (pp. 219-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bassett, K., & Short, J. (1980). Housing and residential structure: Alternative approaches. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Bassett K., & Short J. (1989). Development and diversity in urban geography. In D. Grregory, & R. Walford (Eds.), Horizons in human geography (pp. 175-193). London: Macmillan.
6. Baum, S., Mullins, P., Stimson, R., & O'Connor, K. (2002). Communities of the postindustrial city. Urban Affairs Review, 37 (3), 322-357.
7. Beauregard, R. A., & Haila, A. (1997). The unavoidable incompleteness of the city. American Behavioral Scientist, 41 (3), 327-341.
8. Bell (1968). The city, the suburb and a theory of social choice. In S. Greer (Ed.), The rise of the Rustbelt (pp. 132-168). New York: St Martins.
9. Bell, W. (1953). The social areas of the San Francisco bay region. American Sociological Review, 18, 39-47.
10. Berry, B. J. L., & Kasarda, J. D. (1977). Contemporary urban ecology. New York: Macmillan.
11. Bolt, G., Burgers, J., & van Kempen, R. (1998). On the social significance of spatial location; spatial segregation and social inclusion. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 13, 83-95. 83-95.
12. Bolt, G. S., & van Kempen, R. (1997). Segregation and Turks' housing conditions in middle-sized Dutch cities. New Community, 23, 363-384.
13. Burgers, J. (2002). De gefragmenteerde stad. Amsterdam: Boom.
14. Burgess, E. W. (1925/1974). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 47-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society and culture, volume I: The rise of the network society (second edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Chakravorty S. (2000). From colonial city to globalizing city? The far-from-complete spatial transformation of Calcutta. In P. Marcuse, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Globalizing cities: A new spatial order? (pp. 56-77). Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Clark W. A. V., Deurloo M. C., & Dieleman F. M. (1997). Entry to home-ownership in Germany: Some comparisons with the United States. Urban Studies, 34, 7-19.
18. Clark W. A. V., Deurloo M. C., & Dieleman F. M. (1986). Residential mobility in Dutch housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 18, 763-788.
19. Clark W. A. V. (1996). Residential patterns: Avoidance, assimilation and succession. In R. Waldinger, & M. Bozorgmehr (Eds.), Ethnic Los Angeles (pp. 109-139). New York: Russell Sage.
20. Clark, W. A. V., & Dieleman, F. M. (1996). Households and housing: Choice and outcomes in the housing market. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
21. De Decker, P. (1985). Naar een verklaringsmodel voor woonsegregatie. In Planologische Diskussiebijdragen (pp. 297-310). Delft: Delftsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.
22. Elander I., & Blanc, M. (2001). Partnerships and democracy: A happy couple in urban governance? In H. T. Andersen, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities; social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance (pp. 93-124). Aldershot: Ashgate.
23. Fainstein, S. S., Gordon, I., & Harloe, M. (1992). Divided cities: New York & London in the contemporary world. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Firey, W. F. (1947). Land use in central Boston. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Friedman J. (1995). Where we stand: A decade of world city research. In P. L. Knox, & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), World cities in a world system (pp. 21-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Friedrichs J. (2001). Urban revitalization transforms urban governments: the cases of Dortmund and Duisburg, Germany. In H. T. Andersen, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance (pp. 189-210). Aldershot: Ashgate.
27. Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban studies, 38 (12), 2111-2124.
28. Galster, G., Freiberg, F., & Houk, D. L. (1987). Racial differentials in real estate advertising practices: An exploratory case study. Journal of Urban Affairs, 9, 199-215.
29. Goldsmith, W. W. (1997). The metropolis and globalization: The dialectics of racial discrimination, deregulation, and urban form. American Behavioural Scientist, 41 (3), 299-310.
30. Goldsmith W. W. (2000). From the motropolis to globalization: The dialectics of race and urban form. In P. Marcuse, & R. van Kempen, (Eds.), Globalizing cities: A new spatial order? (pp. 37-55). Oxford: Blackwell.
31. Goldsmith, W. W., & Blakely, E. J. (1992). Separate societies: Poverty and inequalities in U.S. cities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32. Hamnett, C. (1994). Social polarisation in global cities: Theory and evidence. Urban studies, 21, 389-405.
33. Hamnett, C., & Cross, D. (1998). Social polarisation and inequality in London: The earnings evidence, 1979-95. Environment and Planning C, 16, 659-680.
34. Hamnett, C., & Randolph, B. (1988). Cities, housing and profits: Flat break-ups and the decline of private renting. London: Hutchinson.
35. Harris, C. D., & Ullman, E. L. (1945). The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 242, 7-17.
36. Hastings, A. (1996). Unravelling the process of partnership in urban regeneration policy. Urban studies, 33 (2), 401-424.
37. Hawley, A., & Duncan, O. D. (1957). Social area analysis: A critical approach. Land Economics, 33, 337-345.
38. Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S., & Madanipour, A. (Eds.), (1995). Managing cities: The new urban context. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
39. Hollingshead, A. B. (1947). A re-examination of ecological theory. Sociology and Social Research, 31, 194-204.
40. Hoyt, H. (1939). The structure and growth of residential neighbourhoods in American cities. Washington, DC: Federal Housing Administration.
41. Jenkins, P., & P. Wilkinson (2002). Assessing the growing impact of the global economy on urban development in Southern African cities-case studies in Maputo and Cape Town. Cities, 19 (1), 33-47.
42. Jones, E. (1960). A social geography of Belfast. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Judge, D., Stoker, G., & Wolman, H. (Eds.). (1995). Theories of urban politics. London: Sage.
44. Karn, V., Kemeny, J., & Williams, P. (1985). Home ownership in the inner city salvation or despair? Aldershot: Gower.
45. Kesteloot, C. (1980). De ruimtelijke structuur van Brussel-Hoofdstad. Leuven: Acta Geographica Loveniensia.
46. Kesteloot C., De Decker P., & Manço, A. (1997). Turks and housing in Belgium, with special reference to Brussels, Ghent and Visé. In A. Ş Özüekren, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Turks in European cities: Housing and urban segregation (pp. 67-97). Utrecht: European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations.
47. Kristensen H. (2001). Urban policies and programmes against social exclusion and fragmentation: Danish experiences. In H. T. Andersen, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance (pp. 255-272). Aldershot: Ashgate.
48. Levine, M. V. (1995). Globalization and wage polarization in U.S. and Canadian cities: Does public policy make a difference? In P. Kresl, & G. Gappert (Eds.), North American cities and the global economy (pp. 89-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Lin, G. C.S. (2004). The Chinese globalizing cities: National centers of globalization and urban transformation. Progress in Planning, 61 (3), 143-157.
50. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage.
51. Lofland, L. H. (1989). Private lifestyles, changing neighborhoods, and public life: A problem in organized complexity. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 80 (2), 89-96..
52. Logan, J., & Swanstrom, T. (1990). Beyond city limits: Urban policy and economic restructuring in comparitive. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
53. Marcuse, P. (1989). Dual city: A muddy metaphor for a quartered city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13, 697-708.
54. Marcuse, P. (1995). Race, space, and class: The unique and the global in South Africa. Johannesburg: Department of Sociology, University of Witwatersrand.
55. Marcuse, P. (1997). The enclave, the citadel, and the ghetto: What has changed in the post-fordist U.S. city. Urban Affairs Review, 33 (2), 228-264.
56. Marcuse, P. (2002). The partitioned city in history. In P. Marcuse, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Of states and cities: The partitioning of urban space (pp. 11-34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Marcuse, P., & van Kempen, R. (Eds.)(2000a). Globalizing cities: A new spatial order? Oxford: Blackwell.
58. Marcuse, P., & van Kempen, R. (2000b). Introduction. In P. Marcuse, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Globalizing cities: A new spatial order? (pp. 1-21). Oxford: Blackwell.
59. Marcuse, P., & van Kempen, R. (2000c). Conclusion: A changed spatial order. In P. Marcuse, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Globalizing cties: A new spatial order? (pp. 249-275). Oxford: Blackwell.
60. Marcuse, P., & van Kempen, R. (Eds.) (2002). Of states and cities: The partitioning of urban space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. McKenzie, R. D. (1925/1974). The ecological approach to the study of the human community. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 63-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Megbolugbe, I. F., Hoek-Smit, M. C., & Linnenman, P. D. (1996). Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: A review of the contribution of William G. Grisby. Urban Studies, 33, 1779-1795.
64. Mollenkopf, J., & Castells, M. (Eds.). (1991). Dual city: Restructuring New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
65. Murdie, R. A. (1969). Factorial ecology of metropolitan Toronto 1951-1961. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Murie, A., Knorr-Siedow, T., & van Kempen, R. (2003). Large housing estates in Europe: General developments and theoretical backgrounds. Utrecht: Faculty of Geosciences.
67. O'Loughlin, J. (1987). Chicago an der Ruhr or what? In G. Glebe, & A. S. O'Loughlin (Eds.), Foreign minorities in Continental European cities (pp. 52-69). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
68. Özüekren, A. Ş, & van Kempen, R. (1997). Turks in European cities: Housing and urban segregation. Utrecht: European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations.
69. Özüekren, A. Ş, & van Kempen, R. (2003). Dynamics and diversity: Housing careers and segregation of minority ethnic groups. Housing, Theory and Society, 20 (4), 162-171.
70. Pahl, R. (1975). Whose city? Harmondsworth: Penguin.
71. Pahl, R. (1977). Managers, technical experts and the state. In M. Harloe (Ed.), Captive cities (pp. 49-60). London: Wiley.
72. Park, R. E. (1925/1974). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 1-46). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (Eds.), (1925/1974). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74. Philips, D., & Karn, V. (1992). Race and housing in a poverty owning democracy. New Community, 18, 355-369.
75. Power, A. (1997). Estates on the edge: The social consequences of mass housing in Northern Europe. London: Macmillan.
76. Reich, R. (1991). The work of Nations. New York: Random House.
77. Rex, J., & Moore, R. (1967). Race, community and conflict. London: Oxford University Press.
78. Rex, J. (1968). The sociology of a zone of transition. In R. E. Pahl (Ed.), Readings in urban sociology (pp. 211-231). Oxford: Pergamon.
79. Robson, B. T. (1969). Urban analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
81. Sarre, P., Phillips, D., & Skellington, R. (1989). Ethnic minority housing: Explanations and policies. Aldershot: Avebury.
82. Sassen, S. (1984). The new labor demand in global cities. In M. P. Smith (Ed.), Cities in transformation: Class, Capital and the State (pp. 139-171).
83. Sassen, S. (1986). New York city: Economic restructuring and immigration. Development and Change, 17, 85-119.
84. Sassen, S. (1988). The mobility of labor and capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Sassen, S. (1990). Economic restructuring and the American city. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 465-490.
86. Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
87. Sassen, S. (2006). Cities in a world economy (third edition). Thousands Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
88. Sennett, R. (1970). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. New York: Vintage.
89. Shevky, E., & Bell, W. (1955). Social area analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
90. Shevky, E., & Williams, M. (1949). The social areas of Los Angeles. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
91. Speare, A., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. H. (1975). Residential mobility, migration and Metropolitan change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
92. Stapleton, C. M. (1980). Reformulation of the family life-cycle concept: Implications for residential mobility. Environment and Planning A, 12, 1103-1118.
93. Stare, U. (2004). City in change: Globalization, local politics and urban movements in contemporary Stockholm. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 28 (1), 68-85.
94. Taylor, P. J. (2000). World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globalization. Political Geography, 19 (5), 5-32.
95. Timms, D. W. G. (1971). The urban mosaic: Towards a theory of residential differentiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Tomlins, R. (1997). Officer discretion and minority ethnic housing provision. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 12, 179-197.
97. Turner, M. A., & Wienk, R. (1993). The persistence of segregation in urban areas: Contributing causes. In G. T. Kingsley, & M. A. Turner (Eds.), Housing markets and residential mobility (pp. 193-216). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
98. van Kempen, R. (1997). Turks in the Netherlands: Housing conditions and segregation in a developed welfare state. In A. Ş Özüekren, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Turks in European cities: Housing and urban segregation (pp. 158-190). Utrecht: European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations.
99. van Kempen, R. (2002). Towards partitioned cities in the Netherlands? Changing patterns of segregation in a highly developed welfare state. In P. Marcuse, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Of states and cities: The partitioning of urban space (pp. 88-108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. van Kempen, R., & Bolt, G. S. (1997). Turks in the Netherlands: Urban segregation and neighborhood choice. American Behavioral Scientist, 41 (3), 367-388.
101. van Kempen, R., & Marcuse, P. (1997). A new spatial order in cities? American Behavioral Scientist, 41 (3), 285-299.
102. van Kempen, R., & Öüekren, A. Ş. (1998). Ethnic segregation in cities: New forms and explanations in a dynamic world. Urban Studies, 35 (10), 1631-1656.
103. Waley, P. (2000). Tokyo: Patterns of familiarity and partitions of difference. In P. Marcuse, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Globalizing cities: A new spatial order? (pp. 127-157). Oxford: Blackwell.
104. Walliser, A. (2001). Decentralization and urban governance in Barcelona. In H. T. Andersen, & R. van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance (pp. 297-320). Aldershot: Ashgate.
105. Walzer, N. M., & Jacobs, B. D. (1998). Public-private partnerships for local economic development. Westport, CT: Praeger.
106. Webber, M. M. (1964) The urban place and the nonplace urban realm. In M. M. Webber, J. W. Dijckman, D. L. Foley, A. Z. Guttenberg, W. L. C. Wheaton, & C. Bauer Wurster (Eds.), Explorations into urban structure (pp. 79-153). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
107. Wirth, L. (1944). Human ecology. American Journal of Sociology, 50, 483-488.
108. Yeates, M. H. (1989). The North-American city. New York: Harper & Row.