Social security as a criminal sanction

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-16

  McKeever, Gráinne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Benefit Conditionality; Criminal Justice; Sanctions; Social Control; Social Security

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248604694     PISSN: 09649069     EISSN: 14699621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01418030410001694378     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Department of Social Security (1998) New Ambitions for Our Country: A New Contract for Welfare, Cm 3805, London: The Stationery Office.
2. Department for Work and Pensions (2001) Opportunity for All - Making Progress, Third Annual Report, Cm 5260, London: The Stationery Office.
3. Duff, R.A., (1998) ‘Inclusion and exclusion: citizens, subjects and outlaws’, Current Legal Problems 51: 241-266.
4. Duff, R.A. (2001) Punishment, Communication and Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Field, S. (1999) ‘Trends in crime revisited’, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Research Study No 195, London: The Stationery Office.
6. Flood-Page, C. and Mackie, A. (1998) ‘Sentencing practice: an examination of decisions in magistrates’ courts and the crown court in the mid-1990s’, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Research Study No 180, London: The Stationery Office.
7. Garland, D. (1996) ‘the limits of the sovereign state: strategies of crime control in contemporary society’, British Journal of Criminology 36: 445-471.
8. Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Harris, N. (2000) Social Security Law in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Hedderman, C. (1999) The ACOP Enforcement Audit - Stage One. Criminal Policy Research Unit, London: South Bank University.
11. Hedderman, C. (2000) Improving Enforcement: The Second ACOP Audit. Criminal Policy Research Unit, London: South Bank University.
12. Hedderman, C. (2001) Setting New Standards for Enforcement: The Third ACOP Audit. Criminal Policy Research Unit, London: South Bank University.
13. Hedderman, C. and Hearndon, I. (2000) ‘The missing link - effective enforcement and effective supervision’, Probation Journal 47: 126-128.
14. Home Affairs Committee (1997-98), Third Report: Alternatives to Prison Sentences, HC 486, London: The Stationery Office.
15. Home Office (1997-98) Government Reply to the Home Affairs Committee, Third Report, Cm 4174, London: The Stationery Office.
16. Home Office (2000) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community, London: The Stationery Office.
17. Home Office (2002) ‘Crime in England and Wales, 2001/2002’, Statistical Bulletin Issue No: 7/02, London: The Stationery Office.
18. Home Office Communication Directorate (2001) Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales. London: The Stationery Office.
19. House of Commons Standing Committee F (1999-2000) Child Support, Pensions and Social Security Bill, HC 314, London: The Stationery Office.
20. Kershaw, C. (1999) ‘Reconvictions of offenders sentenced to or discharged from prison in 1994’, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Statistical Bulletin No 5/99, London: The Stationery Office.
21. Lundy, L. (1995) ‘Income support and strikers’, Journal of Social Security Law 2: 129-141.
22. Mair, G. and May, C. (1997) ‘Offenders on probation’, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Research Study No 167, London: The Stationery Office.
23. May, C. (1999) ‘Explaining reconviction following a community sentence: the role of social factors’, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Research Study No 192, London: The Stationery Office.
24. May, C. and Wadwell, J. (2000) ‘Enforcing community penalties: the relationship between enforcement and reconviction’, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London: The Stationery Office.
25. McKeever, G. (1999) ‘Fighting fraud: an evaluation of the government’s social security fraud strategy’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 21: 357-371.
26. Merrington, S. (2001) Objectives, Intervention and Reducing Risk, Centre for Criminological Research, Probation Studies Unit, Oxford: University of Oxford.
27. Merrington, S. and Skinns, J. (2001) Using ACE to Profile Criminogenic Needs, Centre for Criminological Research, Probation Studies Unit, Oxford: University of Oxford.
28. NACRO (2000) News Release Briefing Paper, NACRO, London.
29. Plant, R. (1999) ‘Supply side citizenship?’, Journal of Social Security Law 6: 124-136.
30. Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Rose, N. (2000) ‘Government and control’, British Journal of Criminology 40: 321-339.
32. Vincent, J. (1998) ‘Jobseeker’s allowance evaluation: qualitative research on disallowed and sanctioned claimants phase two: after jobseeker’s allowance’, Department for Education and Employment Research Brief No 86, London: The Stationery Office.
33. Von Hirsch, A. (1993) Censure and Sanctions, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
34. Witt, R., Clarke, A. and Fielding, N. (1999) ‘Crime and economic activity: a panel data approach’, British Journal of Criminology 39: 391-400.
35. Worrall, A. (1997) Punishment in the Community: The Future of Criminal Justice, London: Longman.