The impact of electronic patient records on workflow in general practice

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 155-160

  Cauldwell, Matthew R ^a   Beattie, Caroline E ^a   Cox, Benita M ^b   Denby, William J ^a   Ede Golightly, Jessica A ^a   Linton, Fiona L ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Administrative staff; Electronic patient records; General practice; Workflow

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL STAFF; REGISTER; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKING TIME; WORKLOAD;

EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; STATE MEDICINE; SURGICENTERS;

EID: 34248596266     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458207076470     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Access to Medical Records Act 1998. London: Stationery Office, 1998.
2. Nhs Executive. Connecting for Health. London: Department of Health, 2005.
3. PAERS Ltd. Welcome to PAERS. www.paers.net, January 2005.
4. Dobbing, C. Paperless practice: Electronic medical records at Island Health [case study]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2001; 64 (3); 197-9.
5. Maxwell, M. EMR: Successful productivity tool for modern practice. Health Management Technology 1999; 20 (9); 48-9.
6. Bingham A. Computerized patient records benefit physician offices. Health Financial Management 1997; 51 (9); 68-70.
7. Ross S.E., Lin C.T. The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: A review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10 (2); 129-38.
8. Briggs B. Electronic medical records: A 'workflow' in progress. Health Data Management 2002: 64.
9. Van der Aalst W., van Hee K.M. Workflow Management, Models, Methods, and Systems 356. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
10. Ash J.S., Bates D.W. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI Discussion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005; 12; 8-12.
11. Likourezos A., Chalfin D.B., Murphy D.G., Sommer B., Darcy K., Davidson S.J. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an electronic medical record system. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2004; 27 (4); 419-24.
12. Wang S.J., Middleton B., Prosser L.A., Bardon C.G., Spurr C.D., Carchidi P.J., et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. American Journal of Medicine 2003; 114 (5); 397-403.
13. Bowling A. Research Methods in Health. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
14. SPSS Data Editor Version 12 [computer program]. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 2005.
15. Mogey N. So you want to use a Likert scale. http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ ltdi/cookbook/info_likert_scale/, May 2005.
16. Netten A., Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care. Personal Social Services Research Unit. http://www.pssru.ac.uk/pdf/uc2003/ uc2003.pdf 2003, February 2005.
17. Audit Commission. Transforming Primary Care: The Role of PCTs in Shaping and Supporting General Practice. London: Audit Commission, 2004.