A controlled study of job strain in primary-treated cancer patients without metastases

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 534-544

  Gudbergsson, Sævar Berg ^a   Fosså, Sophie D ^a   Sanne, Bjarte ^b   Dahl, Alv A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cancer; Demands control support questionnaire; Job strain; Oncology; Survivors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CENTER; CANCER PATIENT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMAND CONTROL SUPPORT QUESTIONNAIRE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; EMPLOYMENT; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOB STRESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVOR; TESTIS CANCER;

AGE FACTORS; ANXIETY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; NORWAY; OCCUPATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SURVIVORS;

EID: 34248592844     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: 1651226X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841860601156132     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2004. Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo; 2006.
2. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Mãssa B, Deschẽnes L. Work situation after breast cancer: Results from a population-based study. J Nat Cancer Inst 2004;24:1813-22.
3. Spelten ER, Sprangers MAG, Verbeek JHAM. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: A literature review. Psycho-Oncology 2002;11:124-31.
4. Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D. Breast cancer survival, work, and earnings. J Health Econ 2002;21:757-79.
5. Bradley CJ, Benarek HL, Neumark D. Breast cancer and women's labour supply. Health Serv Res 2002;37:1309-28.
6. Bradley CJ, Benarek HL, Neumark D, Schemk M. Short-term effect of breast cancer on labor market attachment: Result from a longitudinal study. Health Econ 2005;24:137-60.
7. Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Spangers M. Return to work of cancer survivors, a prospective cohort study into quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:352-7.
8. Bednarek HL, Bradley CJ. Work and retirement after cancer diagnosis. Res Nursing Health 2005;/28:/126-35.
9. Taskila T, Lindbohm M-L, Matikainen R, Letho U-S, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors' received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. J Supp Care Cancer 2006;5:427-35.
10. van der Doef M, Maes S. The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 1999;13:87-114.
11. Karaksek RA. Job Content Instrument: questionnaire and user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: University of South California; 1985.
12. Theorell T, Karasek RA. Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. J Occup Health Psychol 1996;1:9-26.
13. Landbergis P, Theorell T. Measurement of psychosocial workplace exposure variables. Occup Med 2000;15:163-88.
14. Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 1988;78:1336-42.
15. Pelfrene E, Vlerick P, Mak R, de Smet P, Kornitzer M, de Backer G. Scale reliability and validity of the Karasek 'Job Demand-Control-Support' model in the Belstress study. Work Stress 2001;15:297-313.
16. De Lange A, Taris T, Kompier M, Houtman I, Bongers P. 'The very best of the Millenium', longitudinal research and the Demand-Control-(Support) Model. J Occup Health Psychol 2003;8:282-305.
17. Sanne B, Torp S, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. The Swedish Demands-Control-Support Questionnaire (DCSQ): Factor structure, item analyse, and internal consistency in a large population. Scand J Public Health 2005;33:166-74.
18. Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work: Stress productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books Inc.; 1999.
19. Sanne B, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Moen BE, Tell GS. Testing the Job Demand-Control-Support model with anxiety and depression as outcome: The Hordaland Study. OccupatMed (London) 2005;/55:/463-73.
20. Parkes KR, Mendham CA, von Rabenau C. Social support and the demand-discretion model of job stress: Tests of additive and interactive effects in two samples. J Vocat Behavior 1994;44:91-113.
21. Uchiyama S, Kurasawa T, Sekizawa T, Nakatsuka H. Job strain and risk of cardiovascular events in treated hypertensive Japanese workers: Hypertension follow-up group study. J Occupat Health 2005;47:102-11.
22. Kuper H, Mamot M. Job strain, job demands, decision latitude, and risk of coronary heart disease within the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2003;57:147-53.
23. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:69-77.
24. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short-Form health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary test of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-33.
25. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of the EPQ. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1975.
26. Eysenck SBG, Tambs K. Cross-cultural comparison of personality: Norway and England. Scand J Psychol 1990;31:191-7.
27. Tambs K, Sundet JM, Eaves L, Solaas MH, Berg K. Pedigree analysis of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) Scores in Monozygotic (MZ) Twin families. Behav Genet 1991;21:369-82.
28. Erikson R, Goldtorpe JH. The constant flux. A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.
29. Krokstad S, Westin S. Health inequalities by socioeconomics status among men in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. Scan J Public Health 2002;30:113-24.
30. Sloan JA, Vargas-Chanas, Kamath CC, Sargent DJ, Novotny P, Athertum P, et al. Detecting worms, ducks, and elephants: A simple approach for defining clinically relevant effects in quality-of-life measures. J Cancer Integr Med 2003;1:41-7.