Investigating impacts of land-use land cover change on wetlands in the Muskegon River Watershed, Michigan, USA

Wetlands

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1103-1113

  Torbick, Nathan M ^a   Qi, Jiaguo ^a   Roloff, Gary J ^a   Jan Stevenson, R ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; LULC change; Muskegon River watershed; Pattern metrics; Stress

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; PATCH DYNAMICS; WETLAND MANAGEMENT;

MICHIGAN; MUSKEGON RIVER; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34248590592     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[1103:IIOLLC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, J., E. Hardy, J. Roach, and R. Witmer. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. US Geological Survey Circular 671.
2. Aznar, J., A. Derviuex, and P. Grillas. 2003. Association between aquatic vegetation and landscape indicators of human pressure. Wetlands 23:149-160.
3. Bender, D., T. Contreras, and L. Fahrig. 1998. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79:517-533.
4. Chen, J., S. Saunders, T. Crow, R. Naiman, K. Brosofske, G. Mroz, B. Brookshire, and J. Franklin. 1999. Microclimate in forest ecosystem and landscape ecology. Bioscience 49:288-297.
5. Congalton, R. and K. Green. 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. Lewis Publishers, New York, NY, USA.
6. Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. Golet, and E. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
7. Dahl, T. 2000. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1986 to 1987. US Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
8. Danielson, T. 1998. Wetland Bioassessment Fact Sheets. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Wetlands Division, Washington, DC, USA. EPA843-F-98-001.
9. Danielson, T. 2001. Methods for Evaluating Wetland Condition: Introduction to Wetland Biological Assessment. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.EPA 822-R-01-007a.
10. Davies, K. F., C. Gascon, and C. R. Margules. 2001. p. 81-97. In M. E. Soulé and G. H. Orians (eds.) Conservation Biology: Research Priorities for the Next Decade. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
11. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 487-515.
12. Gottgens, J., B. Swartz, R. Kroll, and M. Eboch. 1998. Long-term GIS-based records of habitat changes in a Lake Erie coastal marsh. Wetlands Ecology and Management 6:5-17.
13. Gustafson, E. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143-156.
14. Haila, Y. 2002. A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecological Applications 12:321-334.
15. Hargis, C., J. Bissonette, and J. David. 1998. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13:167-186.
16. Hobbs, R. 2000. Land-use changes and invasion, p. 55-65. In H. Mooney and R. Hobbs (eds.) Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
17. Houlahan, J. and C. Findlay. 2004. Estimating the 'critical' distance at which adjacent land-use degrades wetland water and sediment quality. Landscape Ecology 19:677-690.
18. Johnston, R. and M. Barson. 1993. Remote sensing of Australian wetlands: an evaluation of Landsat TM data for inventory and classification. Australian Journal Marine Freshwater Environment 44:235-252.
19. Johnston, S. and E. Rejmankova. 2005. Impacts of land use on nutrient distribution and vegetation composition of freshwater wetlands in Northern Belize. Wetlands 25:89-100.
20. Kearns, F., N. Kelly, J. Carter, and V. Resh. 2005. A method for the use of landscape metrics in freshwater research and management. Landscape Ecology 20:113-125.
21. Kelly, N. 2001. Changes to the landscape pattern of coastal North Carolina wetlands under the Clean Water Act, 1984-1992. Landscape Ecology 16:3-16.
22. Kent, B. and J. Mast. 2005. Wetland change analysis of San Dieguito Lagoon, California, USA: 1928-1994. Wetlands 25: 780-787.
23. Leibowitz, S. 2003. Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23:517-531.
24. Li, H. and J. Wu. 2004. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology 19:389-399.
25. Liu, A. and G. Cameron. 2001. Analysis of landscape patterns in coastal wetlands of Galveston Bay, Texas. Landscape Ecology 16:581-595.
26. Lopez, R., C. Davis, and M. Fennessy. 2002. Ecological relationships between landscape change and plant guilds in depressional wetlands. Landscape Ecology 00:1-14.
27. Lunetta, R. and M. Balogh, M. 1999. Application of multitemporal Landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 65: 1303-1310.
28. MacArthur, R. and E. Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, NJ, USA.
29. Mahaney, W., D. Wardrop, and R. Brooks. 2004. Impacts of Stressors on the emergence and growth of wetland plant species in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 24:538-549.
30. Matthews, J., P. Tessene, S. Wiesbrook, and B. Zercher. 2005. Effect of area and isolation on species richness and indices of floristic quality in Illinois, USA wetlands. Wetlands 25: 607-615.
31. McGarigal, K. and B. Marks. 1995. FRAGST ATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, USA. Gen. Tech. Report PNW-GTR-351. Michigan Land Cover/Use Classification System -2000. 2002. Available online: http://www.rsgis.msu.edu/pdf/lclu/Michigan_LC_LU_Classification_System_2000.pdf.
32. Mitsch, W. and J. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
33. Mooney, H. and R. Hobbs. 2000. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
34. Ott, R. and M. Longnecker. 2001. Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Wadsworth Group, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.
35. Pijanowski, B., B. Shellito, S. Pithadia, and K. Alexandridis. 2002. Forecasting and assessing the impact of urban sprawl in coastal watersheds along eastern Lake Michigan. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 7:271-285.
36. Riiters, K., R. O'Neil, C. Hunsaker, J. Wickham, D. Yankees, S. Timmons, K. Jones, and B. Jackson. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10:223-29.
37. Steinman, A., J. Conklin, P. Bohlen, and D. Uzarski. 2003. Influence of cattle grazing and pasture land use on macro-invertebrate communities in freshwater wetlands. Wetlands 23:877-889.
38. Tangen, B., M. Butler, and M. Ell. 2003. Weak correspondence between macroinvertebrate assemblages and land use in prairie pothole region wetlands, USA. Wetlands 23:104-115.
39. Torbick, N., P. Lawrence, and K. Czajkowski. 2006. Application and assessment of an expert system for wetland identification in northwest Ohio, USA. Journal of Environmental Management and Restoration 2:26-37.
40. Townsend, P. and S. Walsh. 2001. Remote sensing of forested wetlands: application of multitemporal and multispectral satellite imagery to determine plant community composition and structure in southeastern USA. Plant Ecology 157:129-149.
41. With, K. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conservation Biology 16:1192-1203.
42. Zacharias, I., E. Dimitriou, and T. Koussouris. 2004. Quantifying land-use alterations and associated hydrologic impacts at a wetland area by using remote sensing and modeling techniques. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 9:23-32.
43. Zimmer, K., M. Hanson, and M. Butler. 2003. Interspecies relationships, community structure, and factors influencing abundance of submerged macrophytes in prairie wetlands. Wetlands 23:717-728.