Nutritional endoderm in a direct developing frog: A potential parallel to the evolution of the amniote egg

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 236, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1259-1272

  Buchholz, Daniel R ^a,c   Singamsetty, Srikanth ^b   Karadge, Uma ^b   Williamson, Sean ^b   Langer, Carrie E ^b   Elinson, Richard P ^b  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Amniote egg; Amniote evolution; Direct development; Eleutherodactylus coqui; Endoderm; Lineage tracing; Sox17; Yolk

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX17;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL LOSS; CELL TYPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; EGG SIZE; EGG YOLK; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENDODERM; FROG; HISTOLOGY; INTESTINE CELL; NONHUMAN; NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOCYTE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; ANURA; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; ENDODERM; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; INTESTINES; MESONEPHROS; OVUM; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; THYROID HORMONES; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; ELEUTHERODACTYLUS COQUI; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 34248588352     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: 10970177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.21153     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arendt D, Nübler-Jung K. 1999. Rearranging gastrulation in the name of yolk: evolution of gastrulation in yolk-rich amniote eggs. Mech Dev 81:3-22.
2. Beckham YM, Nath K, Elinson RP. 2003. Localization of RNAs in oocytes of Eleutherodactylus coqui, a direct developing frog, differs from Xenopus laevis. Evol Dev 5:562-571.
3. Bellairs R. 1964. Biological aspects of the yolk of the hen's egg. Adv Morphog 4:217-272.
4. Callery EM, Elinson RP. 2000. Thyroid hormone-dependent metamorphosis in a direct developing frog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:2615-2620.
5. Callery EM, Fang H, Elinson RP. 2001. Frogs without polliwogs: evolution of anuran direct development. Bioessays 23:233-241.
6. Carroll RL. 1969. Problems of the origin of reptiles. Biol Rev 44:393-432.
7. Carroll RL. 1970. Quantitative aspects of the amphibian-reptilian transition. Forma Functio 3:165-178.
8. Chalmers AD, Slack JMW. 1998. Development of the gut in Xenopus laevis. Dev Dyn 212:509-521.
9. Chalmers AD, Slack JMW. 2000. The Xenopus tadpole gut: fate maps and morphogenetic movements. Development 127:381-392.
10. Chea HK, Wright CV, Swalla BJ. 2005. Nodal signaling and the evolution of deuterostome gastrulation. Dev Dyn 234:269-278.
11. Chipman AD, Haas A, Khaner O. 1999. Variations in anuran embryogenesis: yolk-rich embryos of Hyperolius puncticulatus (Hyperoliidae). Evol Dev 1:49-61.
12. Collazo A, Bolker JA, Keller R. 1994. A phylogenetic perspective on teleost gastrulation. Amer Nat 144:133-152.
13. Danilchik MV, Gerhart JC. 1987. Differentiation of the animal-vegetal axis in Xenopus laevis oocytes. I. Polarized intracellular translocation of platelets establishes the yolk gradient. Dev Biol 122:101-112.
14. Danilchik MV, Denegre JM. 1991. Deep cytoplasmic rearrangements during early development in Xenopus laevis. Development 111:845-856.
15. Dickinson K, Leonard J, Baker JC. 2006. Genomic profiling of Mixer and Sox17 β targets during Xenopus endoderm development. Dev Dyn 235:368-381.
16. D'Souza A, Lee M, Taverner N, Mason J, Carruthers S, Smith JC, Amaya E, Papalopulu N, Zorn AM. 2003. Molecular components of the endoderm specification pathway in Xenopus tropicalis. Dev Dyn 226:118-127.
17. Elinson RP. 1987. Change in developmental patterns: embryos of amphibians with large eggs. In: Raff RA, Raff EC, editors. Development as an evolutionary process. NY: Alan R. Liss, Inc. p 1-21.
18. Elinson RP. 1989. Egg evolution. In: Wake DB, Roth G, editors. Complex organismal functions: integration and evolution in vertebrates. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. p 251-262.
19. Elinson RP, Beckham Y. 2002. Development in frogs with large eggs and the origin of amniotes. Zoology 105:105-117.
20. Elinson RP, Fang H. 1998. Secondary coverage of the yolk sac by the body wall in the direct developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui: an unusual process for amphibian embryos. Dev Genes Evol 208:457-466.
21. Elinson RP, del Pino EM, Townsend DS, Cuesta FC, Eichhorn P. 1990. A practical guide to the developmental biology of terrestrial-breeding frogs. Biol Bull 179:163-177.
22. Goin OB, Goin CJ. 1962. Amphibian eggs and the montane environment. Evolution 16:364-371.
23. Harland RM. 1991. In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. Methods Cell Biol 36:685-695.
24. Hennen S. 1973. Competence tests of early amphibian gastrula tissue containing nuclei of one species (Rana palustris) and cytoplasm of another (Rana pipiens). J Embryol Exp Morphol 29:529-238.
25. Hudson C, Clements D, Friday RV, Stott D, Woodland HR. 1997. Xsox17α and -β mediate endoderm formation in Xenopus. Cell 91:397-405.
26. Ibrahim H, Winklbauer R. 2001. Mechanisms of mesendoderm internalization in the Xenopus gastrula: lessons from the ventral side. Dev Biol 240:108-122.
27. Ishizuya-Oka A. 1996. Apoptosis of larval cells during amphibian metamorphosis. Microsc Res Tech 34:228-235.
28. Ishizuya-Oka A, Ueda S. 1996. Apoptosis and cell proliferation in the Xenopus small intestine during metamorphosis. Cell Tissue Res 286:467-476.
29. Jennings DH, Hanken J. 1998. Mechanistic basis of life history evolution in anuran amphibians: thyroid gland development in the direct-developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. Gen Comp Endocrinol 111:225-232.
30. Laurin M. 2005. Embryo retention, character optimization, and the origin of the extra-embryonic membranes of the amniotic egg. J Nat Hist 39:3151-3161.
31. Laurin M, Reisz RR. 1997. A new perspective on tetrapod phylogeny. In: Martin KLM, Sumida SS, editors. Amniote origins: completing the transition to land. San Diego: Academic Press. p 9-59.
32. Lewis SL, Tam PPL. 2006. Definitive endoderm of the mouse embryo: formation, cell fates, and morphogenetic function. Dev Dyn 235:2315-2329.
33. Masui Y. 2000. The elusive cytostatic factor in the animal egg. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1:228-232.
34. Nath K, Boorech JL, Beckham YM, Burns MM, Elinson RP. 2005. Status of RNAs, localized in Xenopus laevis oocytes, in the frogs Rana pipiens and Eleutherodactylus coqui. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 304B:28-39.
35. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. 1956. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. 243 p.
36. Ninomiya H, Zhang Q, Elinson RP. 2001. Mesoderm formation in Eleutherodactylus coqui: body patterning in a frog with a large egg. Dev Biol 236:109-123.
37. Packard MJ, Seymour RS. 1997. Evolution of the amniote egg. In: Martin KLM, Sumida SS, editors. Amniote origins: completing the transition to land. San Diego: Academic Press. p 265-290.
38. Romer AS. 1957. Origin of the amniote egg. Scientific Monthly 85:57-63.
39. Rugh R. 1962. Experimental embryology. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co. 501 p.
40. Sagata N, Watanabe N, Vande Woude GF, Ikawa Y. 1989. The c-mos proto-oncogene product is a cytostatic factor responsible for the meiotic arrest in vertebrate eggs. Nature 342:512-518.
41. Shi YB. 1994. Molecular biology of amphibian metamorphosis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 5:14-20.
42. Shi YB. 2000. Amphibian metamorphosis: from morphology to molecular biology. New York: Wiley-Liss. 288 p.
43. Shi YB, Brown DD. 1993. The earliest changes in gene expression in tadpole intestine induced by thyroid hormone. J Biol Chem. 268:20312-20317.
44. Shivdasani RA. 2002. Molecular regulation of vertebrate early endoderm development. Dev Biol 249:191-203.
45. Sinner D, Kirilenko P, Rankin S, Wei E, Howard L, Kofron M, Heasman J, Woodland HR, Zorn AM. 2006. Global analysis of the transcriptional network controlling Xenopus endoderm formation. Development 133:1955-1966.
46. Stainier DY. 2002. A glimpse into the molecular entrails of endoderm formation. Genes Dev 16:893-907.
47. Townsend DS, Stewart MM. 1985. Direct development in Eleutherodactylus coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae); a staging table. Copeia 1985:423-436.
48. Wilkinson M, Richardson MK, Gower DJ, Oommen OV. 2002. Extended embryo retention, caecilian oviparity and amniote origins. J Nat Hist 36:2185-2198.
49. Winklbauer R, Schurfield M. 1999. Vegetal rotation, a new gastrulation movement involved in the internalization of the mesoderm and endoderm in Xenopus. Development 126:3703-3713.
50. Xanthos JB, Kofron M, Wylie C, Heasman J. 2001. Maternal VegT is the initiator of a molecular network specifying endoderm in Xenopus laevis. Development 128:167-180.
51. Yasuo H, Lemaire P. 1999. A two-step model for the fate determination of presumptive endodermal blastomeres in Xenopus embryos. Curr Biol 9:8869-8879.
52. Yew N, Oskarsson M, Daar I, Blair DG, Vande Woude GF. 1991. mos gene transforming efficiencies correlate with oocyte maturation and cytostatic factor activities. Mol Cell Biol 11:604-610.
53. Yoshizaki N, Soga M, Ito Y, Mao KM, Sultana F, Yonezawa S. 2004. Two-step consumption of yolk granules during the development of quail embryos. Dev Growth Differ 46:229-238.