Results' analysis of estradiol and progesterone supplementation in luteal phase vs progesterone alone in an assisted reproduction program;Análisis de los resultados de la administración complementaria de estradiol y progesterona en la fase lútea contra progesterona sola en un programa de reproducción asistida

Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 173-182

  Kably Ambe, Alberto ^a   Ruiz Anguas, Julián ^a   Walters Arballo, Fabian ^a   García Benitez, Carlos Quesnel ^a   Karchmer Krivitsky, Samuel ^a  

^a HOSPITAL ÁNGELES LOMAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Estradiol levels; In vitro fertilization; Luteal phase support; Pregnancy rates; Progesterone levels

Indexed keywords

ESTRADIOL VALERATE; GONADORELIN DERIVATIVE; PROGESTERONE; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ARTICLE; COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ESTRADIOL BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LUTEAL PHASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONOTHERAPY; OOCYTE; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGESTERONE BLOOD LEVEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ESTRADIOL; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LUTEAL PHASE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGESTERONE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34248587068     PISSN: 03009041     EISSN: 03009041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Penzias AS. Luteal phase support. Fertil Steril 2002;77:318-23.
2. Toner JP, Singer GA, Jones HW. Uterine receptivity alter ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductíon. In: Gianaroli L, Campana A, Trounson AO, editors. Implantation in mamals. New York: Raven Press, 1993;pp:231-8.
3. Lessey BA, Yeh I, Castelbaum AJ, Fritz MA, Ilesanmi AO, Korzenimowski P. Endometrial progesterone markers of uterine receptivity in the window of implantation. Fertil Steril 1996;65:477-83.
4. Develioglu OH, Hsiu JG, Nikas G, Toner JP, Oehninger S, Jones HW. Endometrial estrogen and progesterone receptor and pinopode expression in stimulated cycles of oocyte donors. Fertil Steril 1999;71:1040-7.
5. Forman RG, Eychenne B, Nesman C, Frydman R, Robel P. Assessing the early luteal phase in in vitro fertilization cycles: relationships between plasma steroids, endometrial receptors, and endometrial histology. Fertil Steril 1989;51:310-6.
6. Licciardi FL, Kwiatkowski BSN, Noyes NL, Berkeley AS, Krey LL, Grifo JA. Oral versus intramuscular progesterona for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 1999;71:614-8.
7. Farhi J, Weissman A, Steinfeld Z, Shorer M, Nahum H, Levran D. Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase may improve the pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2000;73:761-6.
8. Sohn SH, Penzias AS, Emmi AM, et al. Administration of progesterone before oocyte retrieval negatively affects the implantation rate. Fertil Steril 1999;71:11-14.
9. Pritts EA, Atwood AK. Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2287-99.
10. Stovall DW, Van Boris BJ, Sparks AE, Adams LM, Syrop CH. Selective early elimination of luteal support in assisted reproduction cycles using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 1998;70:1056-62.
11. Stelling JR, Barret CB, Penzias AS, Alper MM, Berger MJ, Oskowitz SP. Progesterone support in early IVF/GIFT pregnancies may not be neccesary (abstract 0-095). Presented in the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society Conjoint Annual Meeting, September 25-29, 1999. Toronto, Canada.
12. Kably AA, Ruiz AJ, Baptista PAA, Serulle TY, Quesnel GBC. Uso de antagonistas de GnRH (Cetrorelix en reproducción asistida: Primer informe en la literatura mexicana). Ginecol Obstet Mex 2002;70:424-30.
13. Akman MA, Erden HF, Bener F, Liu JE, Bahceci M. Can luteal phase estradiol levels predict the pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles of good responders whose excess embryos yield blastocists? Fertil Steril 2002;77:638-9.