Split-line design for given geometry and location schemes

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 373-388

  Dagman, Andreas ^a   Söderberg, Rikard ^a   Lindkvist, Lars ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Design process; Geometrical assurance; Industrial design; Product design

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248586923     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: 14661837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544820601008969     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Camelio, J.A., Hu, S.J. and Ceglarek, D.J., Impact of fixture design on sheet metal assembly variation, in 7th Design for Manufacturing Conference, pp. 133-140, 2002 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Montreal, Canada).
2. Dagman, A., Wickman, C. and Söderberg, R., A study of customers' and the automotive industry's attitude regarding visual quality appearance of split-lines, in 4th International Conference on Advanced Engineering Design AED 2004, Glasgow, 2004, p. CD.
3. Hong, Y.S. and Chang, T.-C., A comprehensive review of tolerancing research. Int. J. Product. Res., 2002, 11, 2425-2459.
4. Kumar, S. and Raman, S., Computer-aided tolerancing: the past, the present and the future. J. Design Manufact., 1992, 2, 29-41.
5. Lee, D.J. and Thornton, A.C., The identification and use of key characteristics in the product development process, in The 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, 1996 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Irvine, CA).
6. Maxfield, J., Dew, P.M., Zhao, J., Juster, N.P., Taylor, S., Fitchie, M. and Ion, W.J., Predicting product cosmetic quality in the automobile industry, in 33rd International Symposium an Automotive Technology andAutomotation (ISATA), 2000a (ISATA: Dublin, Ireland).
7. Maxfield, J., Dew, P.M., Zhao, J., Juster, N.P., Taylor, S., Fitchie, M., Ion, W.J. and Thompson, M.T., Predicting Product Cosmetic Quality using Virtual Environment, in ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, p. 19, 2000b (American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Baltimore, MD).
8. Phadke, M.S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
9. Prisco, U. and Giorleo, G., Overview of current CAT systems. Integr. Computer-Aided Eng., 2002, 4, 373-387.
10. Söderberg, R., Robust design by support of CAT tools, in ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, p. 260, 1998 (American Society of Mechanical Engineering: Atlanta, GA).
11. Söderberg, R. and Lindkvist, L., Computer aided assembly robustness evaluation. J. Eng. Design, 1999, 2, 165-181.
12. Söderberg, R. and Lindkvist, L., Stability and seam variation analysis for automotive body design. J. Eng. Design, 2002, 2, 173-187.
13. Taguchi, G., Hsiang, T.C. and Elsayed, E.A., Quality Engineering in Production Systems, 1989 (McGraw-Hill: New York).
14. Warell, A., Design syntactics: a functional approach to visual product form. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, 2002.
15. Wickman, C. and Söderberg, R., Defining quality appearance index weights by combining VR and CAT technologies, in 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1215-1224, 9-12 September 2001 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Pittsburgh, PA).
16. Wickman, C. and Söderberg, R., Increased concurrency between industrial and engineering design using CAT technology combined with virtual reality. Concurr. Eng. Res. Applications, 2003a, 1, 7-16.
17. Wickman, C.G. and Söderberg, R., Comparison of non-nominal geometry models represented in physical versus virtual environments, in 2003 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, pp. 29-37, 15-21 November 2003b (American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Washington, DC).