Pore-scale modeling of non-isothermal reaction phenomena in digitally reconstructed porous catalyst

Molecular Simulation

Volumn 33, Issue 4-5, 2007, Pages 369-377

  Koci P ^a   Stepanek F ^b   Kubicek M ^a   Marek, M ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CO oxidation; Meso scale modeling; Porous structure; Pt Al2O3 catalyst; Reaction and transport

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; POROUS MATERIALS; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

CO OXIDATION; DISCRETISATION POINT; MESO-SCALE MODELING; POROUS STRUCTURE;

REACTION KINETICS;

EID: 34248562607     PISSN: 08927022     EISSN: 10290435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927020601156426     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Kosek, F. Štěpánek, M. Marek. Modeling of transport and transformation processes in porous and multiphase bodies. Adv. Chem. Eng., 30, 137 (2005).
2. I. Chorkendorff, J.W. Niemantsverdriet. Concepts of Modern Catalysis and Kinetics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2003).
3. G. Ertl. Heterogeneous catalysis on atomic scale. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem., 182-183, 5 (2002).
4. P.M. Adler. The method of reconstructed porous media. Curr. Top. Phys. Fluids, 1, 227 (1994).
5. F. Štěpánek, M.A. Ansari. Computer simulation of granule microstructure formation. Chem. Eng. Sci., 60, 4019 (2005).
6. M. Kohout, A.P. Collier, F. Štěpánek. Effective thermal conductivity of wet particle assemblies. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 47, 5565 (2004).
7. F. Štěpánek, M. Marek, P.M. Adler. Modeling capillary condensation hysteresis cycles in reconstructed porous media. AIChE J., 45, 1901 (1999).
8. F. Štěpánek, M. Marek, J. Hanika, P.M. Adler. Mesoscale modeling in multiphase catalysis. Catal. Today, 66, 249 (2001).
9. F.J. Keil. Modeling of phenomena within catalyst particles. Chem. Eng. Sci., 51, 1543 (1996).
10. M.O. Coppens. Structuring catalyst nanoporosity. Structured Catalysts and Reactors, CRC Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton (2006).
11. K. Ramanathan, V. Balakotaiah, D.H. West. Light-off criterion and transient analysis of catalytic monoliths. Chem. Eng. Sci., 58, 1381 (2003).
12. R.E. Hayes, B. Liu, M. Votsmeier. Calculating effectiveness factors in non-uniform washcoat shapes. Chem. Eng. Sci., 60, 2037 (2005).
13. P. Kočí, M. Kubíček, M. Marek. Modeling of TWC monolith converters with microkinetics and diffusion in the washcoat. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 4503 (2004).
14. P. Kočí, M. Kubíček, M. Marek. Periodic forcing of three-way catalyst with diffusion in the washcoat. Catal. Today, 98, 345 (2004).
15. 3 catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci., 61, 3240 (2006).
16. A.P. Roberts. Morphology and thermal conductivity of model organic aerogels. Phys. Rev. E, 55, 1286 (1997).
17. B.E. Poling, J.M. Prausnitz, J.P. O'Connel. The Properties of Gases and Liquids, McGraw-Hill, New York (2001).
18. F. Zhang, R.E. Hayes, S.T. Kolaczkowski. A new technique to measure the effective diffusivity in the washcoat of a monolith reactor. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 82(A4), 481 (2004).
19. R.M. Heck, R.J. Farrauto. Automobile exhaust catalysts. Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 221, 443 (2001).
20. J. Jirát, M. Kubíček, M. Marek. Adsorber-reactor systems for emission treatment from mobile sources. Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 1597 (2001).
21. J. Kašpar, P. Fornasiero, N. Hickey. Automotive catalytic converters: current status and some perspectives. Catal. Today, 77, 419 (2003).
22. 3 three-way catalyst. Appl. Catal. B: Env., 19, 245 (1998).
23. 3 automotive exhaust gas catalyst: kinetic modeling of transient experiments. Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 2019 (2001).