Person and situation effects should be measured in the same terms. A comment on Funder (2006)

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 953-959

  Leising, Marc Daniel ^a   Igl, Wilmar ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Intraclass correlation; Pearson correlation; Person; Situation; Stability

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248561816     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Funder D.C. Towards a resolution of the personality triad: persons, situations and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality 40 (2006) 21-34
2. Furr R.M., and Funder D.C. Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: subjective, objective, variable-centered and person-centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality 38 (2004) 421-447
3. Lin L.I.K. A condordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45 (1989) 255-268
4. Ostendorf F. Measuring interpersonal behavior with the German interpersonal adjective scales. In: Riemann R., Spinath F., and Ostendorf F. (Eds). Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and Structure (2001), Pabst Scientific Publishers, Lengerich 232-260
5. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater-reliability. Psychological Bulletin 2 (1979) 420-428
6. Schuck P. Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which ones should be used?. Quality of Life Research 13 (2004) 571-586
7. Wiggins J.S. Interpersonal adjective scales professional manual (1995), Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL