Dealing with a nuclear Iran

Policy Review

Volumn , Issue 142, 2007, Pages 3-23

  Schake, Kori ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248547922     PISSN: 01465945     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Institute for International Economics, Case Studies in Sanctions and Terrorism, Case 84 - 1, U.S. v. Iran, 44.
2. See, for example, Vice Admiral Lowell Jacoby, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (February 16, 2005).
3. Report of the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States (July 15, 1998), section 1.4.B
4. Steven Weisman, "Europe Resists U.S. Push to Curb Iran Ties," New York Times (January 30, 2007).
5. Suggested in Judith Yaphe and Charles Lutes, Reassessing the Implications of a Nuclear-Armed Iran (National Defense University, 2005).
6. International Institute for Strategic Studies, Military Balance 2006, 172, 169.
7. Islamic Republic of Iran, Management and Planning Organization, Labor Force Indicators (March 21, 2005-March 20, 2006), Table 1.
8. Edward Luttwak underestimates the difficulty of attacking Iranian nuclear facilities in "Three Reasons Not to Attack Iran -Yet," Commentary (May 2006).
9. Sammy Salama and Karen Ruster, "A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences" (Center for Nonproliferation Studies), 5.