Evaluation of the status of anurans on a refuge in suburban Maryland

Journal of Herpetology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 52-60

  Brander, S M ^a,b   Royle, J A ^a   Eames, M ^a  

^a PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANURA; AVES;

EID: 34248546052     PISSN: 00221511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1670/0022-1511(2007)41[52:EOTSOA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ANDERSON, R. P. 2003. Real vs. artefactual absences in species distributions: tests for Oryzomys albigularis (Rodentia: Muridae) in Venezuela. Journal of Biogeography 30:591-605.
2. BISHOP, C. A., K. E. PETIT, M. J. GARTSHORE, AND D. A. MACLEOD. 1997. Extensive monitoring of anuran populations using call counts and road transects in Ontario (1992 to 1993). In D. M. Green (ed.), Amphibians in Decline: Canadian Studies of a Global Problem, pp. 149-160. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, St. Louis, MO.
3. BRIDGES, A. S., AND M. E. DORCAS. 2000. Temporal variation in anuran calling behavior: implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia 2000:587-592.
4. BURNHAM, K. P., AND D. R. ANDERSON. 2002. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York.
5. CALHOUN, A. J. K., T. E. WALLS, S. S. STOCKWELL, AND M. MCCOLLOUGH. 2003. Evaluating vernal pools as a basis for conservation strategies: a Maine case study. Wetlands 23:70-81.
6. CORN, P. S., E. MUTHS, AND W. M. IKO. 2000. A comparison in Colorado of three methods to monitor breeding amphibians. Northwestern Naturalist 81:22-30.
7. CROUCH III, W. B., AND P. W. C. PATON. 2002. Assessing the use of call surveys to monitor breeding anurans in Rhode Island. Journal of Herpetology 36:185-192.
8. GENET, K. S., AND L. G. SARGENT. 2003. Evaluation of methods and data quality from a volunteer-based amphibian call survey. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:703-714.
9. GRANT, E. H. C., R. E. JUNG, J. D. NICHOLS, AND J. E. HINES. 2005. Double-observer's approach to estimating egg mass abundance of pool-breeding amphibians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:305-320.
10. HANSKI, I. A., AND M. E. GILPIN (ED) 1997. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, New York.
11. HIRZEL, A. H., J. HAUSSER, D. CHESSEL, AND N. PERRIN. 2002. Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data. Ecology 83:2027-2036.
12. LEVINS, R. 1969. Effect of random variations of different types on population growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 62:1061.
13. MACKENZIE, D. I., J. D. NICHOLS, G. B. LACHMAN, S. DROEGE, J. A. ROYLE, AND C. A. LANGTIMM. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248-2255.
14. MACKENZIE, D. L, J. D. NICHOLS, J. E. HINES, M. G. KNUTSON, AND A. B. FRANKLIN. 2003. Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84:2200-2207.
15. MACKENZIE, D. I., J. D. NICHOLS, J. A. ROYLE, K. H. POLLOCK, L. L. BAILEY, AND J. E. HINES. 2005. Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence. Academic Press, New York.
16. MOILANEN, A. 2002. Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application. Oikos 96:516-530.
17. MOSSMAN, M. J., L. M. HARTMAN, R. HAY, J. R. SAUER, AND B. J. DHUEY. 1998. Monitoring long-term trends in Wisconsin frog and toad populations. In M. J. Lannoo (ed.), Status and Conservation of Midwestern Amphibians, pp. 169-205. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.
18. PETERJOHN, B. G. 1994. The North American breeding bird survey. Birding 26:386-398.
19. PERRY, M. C., P. KANGAS, AND H. H. OBRECHT III. 1997. Limnology and aquatic birds, monitoring, modeling, and management. In F. A. Comin, J. A. Herrera-Silveira, and J. Ramirez-Ramirez (eds.), Second International Symposium on Limnology and Aquatic Birds, Monitoring, Modelling, and Management, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, November 24-27, 1997, pp. 261-279. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Merida, Mexico.
20. ROYLE, J. A. 2004. Modeling abundance index data from anuran calling surveys. Conservation Biology 18:1378-1385.
21. ROYLE, J. A., AND M. KERY. 2007. A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models. Ecology. In press.
22. ROYLE, J. A., AND W. A. LINK. 2005. A general class of multinomial mixture models for anuran calling survey data. Ecology 86:2505-2512.
23. ROYLE, J. A., AND J. D. NICHOLS. 2003. Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts. Ecology 84:777-790.
24. SHIROSE, L. J., C. A. BISHOP, D. M. GREEN, C. J. MACDONALD, R. J. BROOKS, AND N. J. HELFERTY. 1997. Validation tests of an amphibian call count survey technique in Ontario, Canada. Herpetologica 53:312-320.
25. STEVENS, C. E., A. W. DIAMOND, AND T. S. GABOR. 2002. Anuran call surveys on small wetlands in Prince Edward Island, Canada restored by dredging of sediments. Wetlands 22:90-99.
26. WEIR, L. A., AND M. J. MOSSMAN. 2005. The protocol and history of the amphibian calling survey of the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP). In M. J. Lannoo (ed.), Status and Conservation of US Amphibians. Vol. 1, pp. 307-313. University of California Press, Berkeley.
27. WEIR, L. A., J. A. ROYLE, P. NANJAPPA, AND R. E. JUNG. 2005. Modeling anuran site occupancy and detection probability on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) routes in Maryland. Journal of Herpetology 39:627-639.