Refractive error and visual acuity changes in orthokeratology patients

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 410-416

  Cheung, Sin Wan ^a   Cho, Pauline ^a   Chui, Wan Sang ^a   Woo, George C ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; LogMAR visual acuity; Orthokeratology; Vector analysis

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; PATIENT TREATMENT; REFRACTIVE INDEX;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; LOGMAR VISUAL ACUITY; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; VECTOR ANALYSIS;

VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SCHOOL CHILD; SPECTACLES; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CONTACT LENSES; EYEGLASSES; HUMANS; MYOPIA; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 34248529802     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31804f5acc     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Grosvenor T. Visual acuity, astigmatism and soft contact lenses. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1972;49:407-12.
2. Woo G, Hess R. Contrast sensitivity function and soft contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1979;4:171-6.
3. Guillon M, Sayer G. Critical assessment of visual performance in contact lens practice. Contax 1988;8:10-13.
4. Bosse JC. Use of contrast sensitivity testing for contact lens fitting and management. Contact Lens J 1990;18:75-8.
5. Wachler BS, Phillips CL, Schanzlin DJ, Krueger RR. Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles. CLAO J 1999;25:48-51.
6. Pelli DG, Robson JG. Are letters better than gratings? Clin Vis Sci 1991;25:59-64.
7. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976;53:740-5.
8. Regan D, Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1192-200.
9. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 1988;2:187-99.
10. Cho P, Woo GC. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast Log-MAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004;24:427-35.
11. Mountford J. An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. Int Contact Lens Clin 1997;24:128-43.
12. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:791-9.
13. Lui WO, Edwards MH. Orthokeratology in low myopia, Part 1: efficacy and predictability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2000;23:77-89.
14. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, Barr JT, Bullimore MA. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:252-9.
15. Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, Marsden HJ, Bailey MD, Barr JT. Overnight orthokeratology: preliminary results of the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) study. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:598-605.
16. Tahhan N, Du Toit R, Papas E, Chung H, La Hood D, Holden AB. Comparison of reverse-geometry lens designs for overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:796-804.
17. Walline JJ, Rah MJ, Jones LA. The Children's Overnight Orthokeratology Investigation (COOKI) pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:407-13.
18. Sorbara L, Fonn D, Simpson T, Lu F, Kort R. Reduction of myopia from corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:512-18.
19. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Curr Eye Res 2005;30:71-80.
20. Cheung SW, Cho P. Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology - a cross-sectional study. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:121-7.
21. Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher-order aberrations and best-corrected visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:490-7.
22. Hiraoka T, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Yamaguchi T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Oshika T. Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:429-36.
23. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:367-75.
24. Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:80-5.
25. Efron N. Clinical application of grading scales for contact lens complications. Optician 1997;213:26-35.
26. Yang X, Gong XM, Dai ZY, Wei L, Li SX. [Topographical evaluation on decentration of orthokeratology lenses]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2003;39:335-8.
27. Tutt R, Bradley A, Begley C, Thibos LN. Optical and visual impact of tear break-up in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:4117-23.
28. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards MH, Fung J. An assessment of consecutively presenting orthokeratology patients in a Hong Kong based private practice. Clin Exp Optom 2003;86:331-8.
29. Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:886-91.
30. Messer D, Twelker D, Bhakta R, Zadnik K, Mutti DO, The CLEERE Study Group. Factors affecting the utilization of spectacles in school-aged children. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:E-abstract 055421.