|
Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 240-241
|
Why hasn't neuroprotection worked in Parkinson's disease?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
1,2,3,6 TETRAHYDRO 1 METHYL 4 PHENYLPYRIDINE;
ALPHA TOCOPHEROL;
BIOLOGICAL MARKER;
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AGENTS;
CEP 1347;
NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENT;
RASAGILINE;
RILUZOLE;
SELEGILINE;
TCH 346;
UBIDECARENONE;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
CELL DEATH;
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
DISABILITY;
DISEASE ACTIVITY;
DISEASE COURSE;
DOPAMINE DEFICIENT MOUSE;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG MECHANISM;
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL;
EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMAN;
NERVE DEGENERATION;
NEUROPROTECTION;
NEUROTRANSMISSION;
NONHUMAN;
PARKINSON DISEASE;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ANIMALS;
APOPTOSIS;
CELL SURVIVAL;
HUMANS;
NEURONS;
NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENTS;
PARKINSON DISEASE;
|
EID: 34248524675
PISSN: 1745834X
EISSN: 17458358
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/ncpneuro0491 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (24)
|
References (9)
|