Double pruning of grapevines: A cultural practice to reduce infections by Eutypa lata

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 61-66

  Weber, Edward A ^a   Trouillas, Florent P ^b   Gubler, W Douglas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canker disease; Prepruning

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUTYPA; EUTYPA LATA;

EID: 34248523153     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alleweldt, G., R. Eibach, and E. Ruhl. 1982. Investigations on gas exchange in grapevine. I. Influence of temperature, leafage and daytime on net photosynthesis and transpiration. Vitis 21:93-100.
2. Bennett, J., P. Jarvis, G.L. Creasy, and M.C.T. Trought. 2005. Influence of defoliation on overwintering carbohydrate reserves, return bloom, and yield of mature Chardonnay grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 56:386-393.
3. Carter, M.V. 1991. The status of Eutypa lata as a pathogen. Monograph, Phytopathological Paper 32. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, International Mycological Institute, Oxon, UK.
4. Carter, M.V., A. Bolay, and F. Rappaz. 1983. An annotated host list and bibliography of Eutypa armeniacae. Rev. Plant Pathol. 62: 251-258.
5. Chapuis, L., L. Richard, and B. Dubos. 1998. Variation in susceptibility of grapevine pruning wound to infection by Eutypa lata in south-west France. Plant Pathol. 47:463-472.
6. Gubler, W.D., and GM. Leavitt. 1992. Eutypa dieback of grapevines. In Grape Pest Management, 2d ed. D.L Flaherty et al. (Eds.), pp. 71-75. Publication 3343. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland.
7. Kriedemann, P.E., W.M. Kliewer, and J.M. Harris. 1970. Leaf age and photosynthesis in Vitis vinifera L. Vitis 7:97-104.
8. Mahoney, N., R. Lardner, R.J. Molyneux, E.S. Scott, L.R. Smith, and T.K. Schoch. 2003. Phenolic and heterocyclic metabolite profiles of the grapevine pathogen Eutypa lata. Phytochemistry 64:475-484.
9. May, P., and P.B. Scholefield. 1972. Long term response of Sultana vines to harvest pruning. Vitis 11:296-302.
10. Molyneux, R.J., N. Mahoney, P. Baymen, R.Y. Wong, K. Meyer, and N. Ireland. 2002. Eutypa dieback in grapevines: Differential production of acetylenic phenol metabolites by strains of Eutypa lata. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:1393-1399.
11. Munkvold, G.P., and J.J. Marois. 1993a. The effects of fungicides on Eutypa lata germination, growth, and infection of grapevines. Plant Dis. 77:50-55.
12. Munkvold, G.P., and J.J. Marois. 1993b. Efficacy of natural epiphytes and colonizers of grapevine pruning wounds for biological control of Eutypa dieback. Phytopathology 83:624-629.
13. Munkvold, G.P., J.A. Duthie, and J.J. Marois. 1994. Reductions in yield and vegetative growth of grapevines due to Eutypa dieback. Phytopathology 84:186-192.
14. Petzoldt, C.H., W.J. Moller, and M.A. Sall. 1981. Eutypa dieback of grapevine: Seasonal differences in infection and duration of susceptibility of pruning wounds. Phytopathology 71:540-543.
15. Rolshausen, P.E., and W.D. Gubler. 2005. Use of boron for the control of Eutypa dieback of grapevines. Plant Dis. 88:734-738.
16. Scholefield, P.B., P. May, and T.F. Neales. 1977. Harvest-pruning and trellising of 'Sultana' vines. I. Effects on yield and vegetative growth. Sci. Hortic. 7:115-122.
17. Siebert, J.B. 2001. Eutypa: The economic toll on vineyards. Wines & Vines (April):50-56.
18. Thorne, E.T., B.M. Young, G.M. Young, J.F. Stevenson, J.M. Labavitch, M.A. Matthews, and T.L. Rost. 2006. The structure of xylem vessels in grapevine (vitaceae) and a possible passive mechanism for the systemic spread of bacterial disease. Am. J. Bot. 93:497-504.