Outcomes of myocardial infarction in hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention facilities

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 167, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 913-920

  Labarere, Jose ^a,b   Belle, Loic ^c   Fourny, Magali ^b   Genès, Nathalie ^d   Lablanche, Jean Marc ^e   Blanchard, Didier ^f   Cambou, Jean Pierre ^g   Danchin, Nicolas ^h  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Centre Hospitalier de la Region d'Annecy   (France)

^d SANOFI   (France)

^e LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^f Clinique Saint Gatien   (France)

^g INSERM   (France)

^h HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT; HEPARIN; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA BALLOON; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CARDIOLOGY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FRANCE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 34248520884     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.9.913     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13-20.
2. Dalby M, Bouzamondo A, Lechat P, Montalescot G. Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2003;108:1809-1814.
3. Fernandez-Avilés F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, et al. Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:1045-1053.
4. Le May MR, Wells GA, Labinaz M, et al. Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:417-424.
5. Scheller B, Hennen B, Hammer B, et al. Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:634-641.
6. Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2005;353: 2758-2768.
7. Brophy JM, Bogaty P. Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis are both reasonable options in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141: 292-297.
8. Van de Werf F, Gore JM, Avezum A, et al. Access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: multinational registry study. BMJ. 2005;330:441.
9. Every NR, Larson EB, Litwin PE, et al; Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators. The association between on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:546-551.
10. Danchin N, Blanchard D, Steg PG, et al. Impact of prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction on 1-year outcome: results from the French Nationwide USIC 2000 Registry. Circulation. 2004;110:1909-1915.
11. Hanania G, Cambou JP, Gueret P, et al. Management and in-hospital outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to intensive care units at the turn of the century: results from the French nationwide USIC 2000 registry. Heart. 2004;90:1404-1410.
12. Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR. Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:327-333.
13. Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Wallentin L. Long-term outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs prehospital and in-hospital thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2006;296:1749-1756.
14. Khadour FH, Fu Y, Chang WC, et al. Impact of on-site cardiac interventional facilities on management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2003;19:257-263.
15. Every NR, Parsons LS, Fihn SD, et al; Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Investigators. Long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals with and without on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. Circulation. 1997;96:1770-1775.
16. Krumholz HM, Chen J, Murillo JE, Cohen DJ, Radford MJ. Admission to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities: impact on long-term costs and outcomes. Circulation. 1998;98:2010-2016.
17. Steg PG, Iung B, Feldman LJ, et al; ENACT Investigators. Determinants of use and outcomes of invasive coronary procedures in acute coronary syndromes: results from ENACT. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:613-622.
18. Stenestrand U. Improper statistical explanation for surprising outcome in the GRACE-study of access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with ACS? http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/330/7489/441#100753. Accessed June 7, 2006.
19. Llevadot J, Giugliano RP, Antman EM, et al. Availability of on-site catheterization and clinical outcomes in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2104-2115.
20. Danchin N, Grenier O, Ferrieres J, Cantet C, Cambou JP. Use of secondary preventive drugs in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated medically or with coronary angioplasty: results from the nationwide French PREVENIR survey. Heart. 2002;88:159-162.
21. Mehta RH, Montoye CK, Faul J, et al. Enhancing quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: shifting the focus of improvement from key indicators to process of care and tool use: the American College of Cardiology Acute Myocardial Infarction Guidelines Applied in Practice Project in Michigan: Flint and Saginaw Expansion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2166-2173.
22. Danchin N, Cambou JP, Hanania G, et al. Impact of combined secondary prevention therapy after myocardial infarction: data from a nationwide French registry. Am Heart J. 2005;150:1147-1153.
23. Ho PM, Spertus JA, Masoudi FA, et al. Impact of medication therapy discontinuation on mortality after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1842-1847.
24. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:E1-E211.
25. Belle L, Labarere J, Fourny M, Cambou JP, Danchin N. Variations in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Alps hospitals and other French hospitals: secondary analysis of the USIC 2000 study data. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2005;54:310-316.
26. Debaty G, Belle L, Labarere J, et al. Evolution of strategies of revascularization in acute coronary syndrome with ST elevation: analysis of the RESURCOR. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2007;100:105-111.