The interaction between the use of ict and mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge base for teaching

Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 87-100

  Crisan, Cosette ^a  

^a LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248403890     PISSN: 14794802     EISSN: 17540178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14794800008520086     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Byard, M. J.: 1995, ‘IT under school-based policies for Initial Teacher Training.’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 11, 128-140.
2. Department for Education and Employment: 1998, Circular number 4/98: Requirements for Courses of Initial Teacher Training. London: DfEE.
3. Downes, T.: 1993, ‘Student-teachers’ experiences in using computers during teaching practices.’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9, 17-33.
4. Ernest, P.: 1989, ‘The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the maths teacher: A model.’ Journal of Education for Teaching, 75(1), 13-33.
5. Even, R.: 1990, ‘Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions.’ Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 521-544.
6. Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M. and Shulman, L. S.: 1989, ‘Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge of teaching.’ In M. C. Reynolds (ed.), Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher (pp. 23-36). New York: Pergamon Press.
7. Lloyd, G. and Wilson, M.: 1998, ‘Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum.’ Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 248-274.
8. Mandinach, E. B. and Cline, EL: 1994, Classroom Dynamics: Implementing a Technology-Based Learning Environment. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Marcinkiewicz, H.R.: 1994, ‘Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computers use in the classroom.’ Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 230-235.
10. Marks, R.: 1991, ‘Pedagogical content knowledge: from a mathematical case to a modified conception.’ Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3-11.
11. McNamara, D.: 1991, ‘Subject knowledge and its application: Problems and possibilities for teacher educators.’ Journal of Education for Teaching, 17(2), 113-128.
12. Simmt, E.: 1997, ‘Graphing calculators in high school mathematics.’ Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(23), 269-289.
13. Sherwood, C.: 1993, ‘Australian experiences with the effective classroom integration of information technology: Implications for teacher education.’ Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 2(2), 167-179.
14. Shulman, L. S.: 1986, ‘Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.’ Educational Research, 15(2), 4-14.
15. Shulman, L. S.: 1987, ‘Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.’ Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
16. Smith, D. C. and Neale D. C.: 1989, ‘The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching.’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1-20.
17. Thompson, A. G.: 1992, ‘Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research.’ In D.A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
18. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S. and Richert, A. E.: 1987, ‘150 Different Ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching.’ In J. Calderhead (ed.), Exploring teachers ’ thinking, (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell Educational Limited