Four practical and conceptual assessment issues that evaluators should address in capital case mental retardation evaluations

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 169-178

  Young, Bethany ^a   Boccaccini, Marcus T ^a   Conroy, Mary Alice ^a   Lawson, Kristy ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive functioning; Capital case; Correctional officer informants; Criminal behavior; Evaluation methods; Flynn effect; Forensic; Intelligence test scores; Mental retardation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248390596     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.38.2.169     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American Association on Mental Retardation. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association, 57, 1060-1073.
5. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
6. Brodsky, S. L., & Galloway, V. A. (2003). Ethical and professional demands for forensic mental health professionals in the post-Atkins era. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 3-9.
7. Clemons v. Alabama, CR-01-1355 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005). Retrieved July 14, 2006, from LexisNexis database.
8. Duvall, J. C., & Morris, R. J. (2006). Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases: Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 658-665.
9. Everington, C. E., & Keyes, D. W. (1999, July-August). Diagnosing mental retardation in criminal proceedings: The critical importance of documenting adaptive behavior. The Forensic Examiner, 8, 31-34.
10. Ex parte Jose Garcia Briseno, 135 S.W.Sd 1 (2004).
11. Fabian, J. M. (2006). State Supreme Court responses to Atkins v. Virginia: Adaptive functioning assessment in light of purposeful planning, premeditation and the behavioral context of homicide. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6(4), 1-25.
12. Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29-51.
13. Flynn, J. R. (1985). Wechsler intelligence tests: Do we really have a criterion of mental retardation? American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 236-244.
14. Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171-191.
15. Flynn, J. R. (1998). WAIS-III and WISC-III IQ gains in the United States from 1972 to 1995: How to compensate for obsolete norms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1231-1239.
16. Flynn, J. R. (2000). The hidden history of IQ and special education: Can the problems be solved? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 191-198.
17. Flynn, J. R. (2006). Tethering the elephant: Capital cases, IQ, and the Flynn effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 170-189.
18. Greenspan, S. (2006). Issues in the use of the "Flynn effect" to adjust IQ scores when diagnosing MR. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Newsletter, 31(3), 3-7.
19. Greenspan, S., & Switzky, H. N. (2003). Execution exemption should be based on actual vulnerability, not disability label. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 19-26.
20. Harrison, P. L., Kaufman, A. S., Hickman, J. A., & Kaufman, N. L. (1988). A survey of tests used for adult assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6, 188-198.
21. Harrison, P. L., & Oakland, T. (2003). Adaptive behavior assessment system II: Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
22. Hutton, J. B., & Dubes, R. (1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271-284.
23. Kanaya, T., Ceci, S. J., & Scullin, M. H. (2005). Age differences within secular IQ trends: An individual growth modeling approach. American Psychologist, 33, 613-621.
24. Kanaya, T., Scullin, M. H., & Ceci, S. J. (2003). The Flynn effect and U.S. policies: The impact of rising IQ scores on American society via mental retardation diagnoses. American Psychologist, 58, 778-790.
25. Luckasson, R., Coulter, D., Polloway, E. A., Reiss, S., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M., et al. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support (9th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
26. Nihira, K., Leland, H., & Lambert, N. (1993). AAMR Adaptive Behavior Scales-Residential and Community (ABS-RC:2). Austin, TX: PROED.
27. Olley, J. G. (2006). The assessment of adaptive behavior in adult forensic cases: Part 1. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Newsletter, 32(1), 2-4.
28. Olley, J. G., Greenspan, S., & Switzky, H. (2006). Division 33 Ad Hoc Committee on Mental Retardation and the Death Penalty. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Newsletter, 31(2), 11-13.
29. Olvera, D. R., Dever, R. B., & Earnest, M. A. (2000). Mental retardation and sentences for murder: Comparison of two recent court cases. Menial Retardation, 38, 228-233.
30. Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).
31. Pruitt v. Indiana, 834 N.E.2d 90 (2005).
32. Reschly, D. J., Myers, T. G., & Hartel, C. R. (Eds.). (2002). Mental retardation: Determining eligibility for social security benefits. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). VinelandAdaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
34. Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland-II: Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-Second Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
35. Stevens, K. B., & Price, J. R. (2006). Adaptive behavior, mental retardation, and the death penalty. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6(3), 1-29.
36. Stinnett, T. A., Havey, J. M., & Oehler-Stinnett, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331-350.
37. Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (2005). A long-term rise and decline in intelligence test performance: The Flynn effect in reverse. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 837-843.
38. Tennard v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 274 (2004).
39. Walker v. True, 399 F.3d 315 (2005).
40. Watt, M. J., & MacLean, W. E. (2003). Competency to be sentenced and executed. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 35-41.
41. Wechsler, D. (1949). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
42. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
43. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
44. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
45. Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III: Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
46. Wechsler, D. (2003). WISC-IV: Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.