Bisecting lines with different tools in right brain damaged patients: The role of action programming and sensory feedback in modulating spatial remapping

Cortex

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 397-410

  Neppi Mòdona, Marco ^a   Rabuffetti, Marco ^b   Folegatti, Alessia ^a   Ricci, Raffaella ^a   Spinazzola, Lucia ^a   Schiavone, Francesca ^a   Ferrarin, Maurizio ^b   Berti, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE DON CARLO GNOCCHI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Brain damage; Far and near space; Neglect; Spatial remapping; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; NEUROMODULATION; OBJECT RELATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 34248384294     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70465-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ACKROYD K, RIDDOCH MJ, HUMPHREYS GW, NIGHTINGALE S and TOWNSEND S. Widening the sphere of influence: Using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase, 8: 1-12, 2002.
2. AGLIOTI S, SMANIA N, MANFREDI M and BERLUCCHI G. Disownership of left hand and of objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage. Neuroreport, 8: 293-296, 1996.
3. ALBERT ML. A simple test for visual neglect. Neurology, 23: 658-664, 1973.
4. BERTI A and FRASSINETTI F. When far becomes near: Re-mapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 415-420, 2000.
5. BERTI A and RIZZOLATTI G. Coding far and near space. In Karnath H-O, Milner D and Vallar G (Eds), The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
6. BISIACH E, PERANI D, VALLAR G and BERTI A. Unilateral neglect: Personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia, 24: 759-767, 1986.
7. BJOERTOMT O, COWEY A and WALSH V. Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 125: 2012-2022, 2002.
8. COLBY CL. Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron, 20: 15-24, 1998.
9. COLBY CL, DUHAMEL JR and GOLDBERG ME. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: Anatomic location and visual response properties. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69: 902-914, 1993.
10. COLBY CL, DUHAMEL JR and GOLDBERG ME. Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76: 2841-2852, 1996.
11. COWEY A, SMALL M and ELLIS S. Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia, 32: 1059-1066, 1994.
12. COWEY A, SMALL M and ELLIS S. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space. Neuropsychologia, 37: 1-6, 1999.
13. DILLER L and WEINBERG J. Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: The evolution of a rational remediation program. In Weinsein EA and Friedland RP (Eds), Hemi-Inattention and Hemispheric Specialization: Advances in Neurology. New York: Raven Press, 1977.
14. DI PELLEGRINO G, LÀDAVAS E and FARNÈ A. Seeing where your hands are. Nature, 388: 730, 1997.
15. DUHAMEL JR, BREMMER F, BENHAMED S and GRAF W. Spatial invariance of visual receptive field in parietal cortex neurons. Nature, 389: 845-848, 1997.
16. FARNÈ A and LÀDAVAS E. Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 11: 1645-1649, 2000.
17. FOGASSI L, GALLESE V, FADIGA L, LUPPINO G, MATELLI M and RIZZOLATTI G. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). Journal of Neurophysiology, 76: 141-157, 1996.
18. GENTILUCCI M, FOGASSI L, LUPPINO G, MATELLI M, CAMARDA R and RIZZOLATTI G. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. I. Somatotopy and the control of proximal movements. Experimental Brain Research, 71: 475-490, 1988.
19. GRAZIANO MS and GROSS CG. The representation of extrapersonal space: Possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons. In Gazzaniga M (Ed), The Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
20. GRAZIANO MS, YAP GS and GROSS CG. Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266: 1054, 1994.
21. HALLIGAN P and MARSHALL JM. Left neglect for near but not for far space in man. Nature, 350: 498-500, 1991.
22. IRIKI A, TANAKA M and IWAMURA Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque post-central neurons. Neuroreport, 7: 2325-2330, 1996.
23. LATTO R and COWEY A. Visual field defects after frontal eye-field lesions in monkeys. Brain Research, 30: 1-24, 1971.
24. LEINONEN L, HYVARINEN G, NYMANI G and LINNANKOSKI I. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 34: 299, 1979.
25. MARAVITA A, HUSAIN H, CLARKE K and DRIVER J. Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 39: 580-585, 2001.
26. PEGNA AJ, PETIT L, CALDARA-SCHNETZER AS, KHATEB A, ANNONI JM, SZTAJZEL R and LANDIS T. So near yet so far: Neglect in far space depends on tool use. Annals of Neurology, 50: 820-822, 2001.
27. PITZALIS S, DI RUSSO F, SPINELLI D and ZOCCOLOTTI P. Influence of the radial and vertical dimension on lateral neglect. Experimental Brain Research, 136: 281-294, 2001.
28. RIZZOLATTI G, BERTI A and GALLESE V. Spatial neglect: Neurophysiological bases, cortical circuit and theories. In Boller F, Grafman J and Rizzolatti G (Eds), Handbook of Neuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2000.
29. SHELTON PA, BOWERS D and HEILMAN KM. Peripersonal and vertical neglect. Brain, 113: 191-205, 1990.
30. VUILLEUMIER P, VALENZA N, MAYER E, REVERDIN A and LANDIS T. Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 43: 406-410, 1998.
31. WEISS PH, MARSHALL JC, WUNDERLICH G, TELLMANN L, HALLIGAN P, FREUND HJ, ZILLES K and FINK GR. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain, 123: 2531-2541, 2000.