Evaluation of long descriptions of statistical graphics for blind and low vision web users

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2398, Issue , 2002, Pages 517-526

  Ault, H K ^a   Deloge, J W ^a   Lapp, R W ^b   Morgan, M J ^b   Barnett, J R ^a  

^a Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^b Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

CHARTS AND GRAPHS; GRAPHICAL INFORMATION; LOW VISION; RESEARCH TEAMS; STATISTICAL GRAPHICS; USABILITY STUDIES; WEB DEVELOPERS; WEB USERS;

WEBSITES;

EID: 34248376377     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45491-8_99     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Georgia Institute of Technology: GVU’s WWW User Surveys (2001) http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/user_surveys/
2. World Wide Web Consortium: About the World Wide Web Consortium. Cambridge, MA: (2001) http://www.w3.org/Consortium/
3. Blenkhorn, P., Evans, D.: Using Speech and Touch to Enable Blind People to Access Schematic Diagrams. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. (1998) 17-29
4. Tufte, E.R.: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire CT USA (2001)
5. Rothberg, M., Wlodkowski, T.: Making Educational Software Accessible: Design Guidelines Including Math and Science Solutions. The CD-ROM Access Project [CDROM]. The CPB/WGBH National Center for Accessible Media, Boston, MA USA. (2000) http://main.wgbh.org/wgbh/pages/ncam/cdrom/guideline/
6. Oregon State University: The Science Access Project. Department of Physics. (1999) http://dots.physics.orst.edu/triangle.html
7. Webster, A., Roe, J.: Children With Visual Impairments. Social Interaction, Language and Learning. New York, NY: Routledge (1998)
8. Rassmus-Gröhn, K., Sjöström, C.: Using a Force Feedback Device to Present Graphical Information to People with Visual Disabilities. The Second Swedish Symposium on Multimodal Communication (SSMC’98), Lund, Sweden (1998) http://www.certec.lth.se/doc/usinga/
9. Lowenfeld, B.: The Visually Handicapped Child in School. New York, NY. The John Day Company (1973).
10. Center for Applied Special Technology: Bobby 3.2. Peabody, MA: (2000). http://www.cast.org/bobby/
11. Brewer, J.: Overview of the Web Accessibility Initiative. Cambridge, MA USA (2000) http://www.w3.org/Talks/WAI-Intro/slide1-0.html
12. National Center for Accessible Media: Web Accessibility Projects. WGBH, Boston. MA USA (2001) http://ncam.wgbh.org/webaccess/index.html
13. University of Washington: Accessible Web Page Design. DO-IT Program, Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking and Technology (2001) http://www.washington.edu/doit/Resources/web-design.html
14. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Statistics a Powerful Edge. (2000) http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/
15. Deloge, J.W., Lapp, R.W., Morgan, M.J.: Web Based Education for the Visually Impaired. Interactive Qualifying Project # 01D107I. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester MA USA (2001)
16. Hayes, B.: Speaking of Mathematics. American Scientist, (March-April 1996) 1-7
17. Utz, W.R.: The Blind Student in the Mathematics Classroom. American Mathematical Monthly. (Jun-July 1979) 491-494
18. Center for Advanced Educational Services: PIVoT: The Physics Interactive Video Tutor. MIT, Cambridge, MA USA (2000) http://caes.mit.edu/research/pivot/index.html
19. Ault, H.K., Deloge, J.W., Lapp, R.W., Morgan, M.J., Barnett, J.R.: Web Accessibility of Statistical Data for Blind and Low Vision Users. 1st Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology. University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK (2002) 25-32
20. World Wide Web Consortium: HTML Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Cambridge, MA USA (2000) 21. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-WCAG10-HTML-TECHS-20001106/
21. Beumer, J., Van der Ven, J.: Implications of Computer-Mediated Communication for People Who Are Visually Impaired in Dealing with Complex Visualisation Tasks. American Foundation for the Blind. (2000). 94:(7) 453-456