Clinical value of transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of suspected neoplasia in the small pelvis

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 195-200

  Rinnab, Ludwig ^a   Gottfried, H W ^b   Schnoller T ^a   Hautmann, R E ^a   Kuefer, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

^b Sleep Laboratory   (Germany)

Author keywords

Endorectal biopsy; Pelvic neoplasias; TRUS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BONE BIOPSY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL STUDY; COLON CANCER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS TUMOR; PROSTATE CANCER; STOMACH CANCER; TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA, TRANSITIONAL CELL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASOUND, HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED, TRANSRECTAL;

EID: 34248371017     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963021     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hatch K. Pelvic exenteration. In: Berek JSHN (Hrsg). Practical Gynecolic Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. 2000: 829-845
2. Malmstrom H. Fine-needle aspiration cytology versus core biopsies in the evaluation of recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 65: 69-73
3. Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound. Curr Opin Urol 2000; 10: 111-116
4. Sailer M, Bussen D, Fein M et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsies of pelvic tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 342-346
5. Arulampalam TH, Costa DC, Loizidou M et al. Positron emission tomography and colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 176-189
6. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Torashima M et al. Dynamic MR imaging of recurrent postoperative cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 167-171
7. Weber TM, Sostman HD, Spritzer CE et al. Cervical carcinoma: determination of recurrent tumor extent versus radiation changes with MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194: 135-139
8. Seitz K. New goals for contrast-enhanced sonography. Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 455-457
9. Konopke R, Kersting S, Saeger HD et al. Detection of liver lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound - comparison to intraoperative findings. Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 107-113
10. Drudi FM, Giovagnorio F, Carbone A et al. Transrectal colour Doppler contrast sonography in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy - comparison with MRI. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 146-151
11. Wichmann MW, Muller C, Lau-Werner U et al. The role of carcinoembryonic antigen for the detection of recurrent disease following curative resection of large-bowel cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000; 385: 271-275
12. Stroh C, Manger T. Ultrasound diagnosis of rare retrorectal tumors. Zentralbl Chir2003; 128: 1075-1079
13. Albrecht H, Stroszczynski C, Felix R et al. Real time 3D (4D) ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of solid tumours. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 324-328
14. Hunerbein M, Totkas S, Moesta KT et al. The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the postoperative follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. Surgery 2001; 129: 164-169
15. Weiss H, Duntsch U. Complications of fine needle puncture. DEGUM survey II. Ultraschall in Med 1996; 17: 118-130
16. Giede C, Toi A, Chapman W et al. The use of transrectal ultrasound to biopsy pelvic masses in women. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 552-556
17. Gupta RK, Cheung YK, alAnsari AG et al. Value of image-guided needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of pelvic and retroperitoneal masses. A study of 112 cases. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 393-398
18. Nagano T, Nakai Y, Taniguchi F et al. Diagnosis of paraaortic and pelvic lymph node metastasis of gynecologic malignant tumors by ultrasound-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer 1991; 68: 2571-2574