Looking through opacity

Theoretical Linguistics

Volumn 29, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 123-139

  Mielke, Jeff ^a   Armstrong, Mike ^a   Hume, Elizabeth ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248367631     PISSN: 03014428     EISSN: 16134060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/thli.29.1-2.123     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anttila, R. (1989) Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 6. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
2. Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2003) The acquisition of phonological opacity [ROA 593]. To appear in proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within OT
3. Bybee, Joan. 1998. The emergent lexicon. CLS 34: The panels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. 421–435
4. Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
5. Halle, M. and K.P. Mohanan (1985) Segmental phonology of modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 57–116
6. Hayes, B. (1999) Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages [ROA 327]. To appear in R. Kager, J. Pater, and W. Zonneveld (eds.), Fixing priorities: constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Itô, J. (1986) Syllable Theory in Prosodic Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
8. Itô, J. (1989) A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7. 217–259
9. Itô, J., and A. Mester (1999) On the sources of opacity in OT: Coda processes in German [ROA 347]
10. Kaplan, L. (1981). Phonological Issues in North Alaskan Inupiaq. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center
11. Kenstowicz, M. (1994) Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell
12. Kenstowicz, M., and C. Kisseberth (1979) Generative Phonology. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc
13. Kiparsky, P. (1968) Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, E., and R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 170–202). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
14. Kiparsky, P. (1971) Historical Linguistics. A Survey of linguistic science, ed. by W. Dingwall, 576–649. College Park: Linguistics Program, University of Maryland
15. Kiparsky, P. (2000) Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17. 1–15
16. McCarthy, J. (1998) Sympathy and Phonological Opacity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. [ROA- 252]
17. McCarthy, J. (1999) Sympathy, cumulativity, and the Duke-of-York gambit. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. [ROA- 315]
18. McCarthy, J. (2003) Comparative Markedness
19. Mielke, J. (forthcoming) The theory of emergent distinctive features. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University
20. Pierrehumbert, J. (2001) Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained. In J. McQueen and A. Cutler (Eds) SWAP special issue, Language and Cognitive Processes 16 5/6, 691–698
21. Pinker, S. (1999) Words and Rules. New York: Basic Books
22. Port, Robert F. (1996) The discreteness of phonetic elements and formal linguistics: response to A. Manaster Ramer. Journal of Phonetics 24. pp. 491–511
23. Prince, A. and P. Smolensky (1993) Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. [ROA–537]
24. Sanders, N. (2003) Opacity and Sound Change in the Polish Lexicon. PhD dissertation, UC Santa Cruz
25. Scott, N. C. (1957) Notes on the pronunciation of Sea Dayak. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 20. pp. 509–512
26. Scott, N.C. (1964) Nasal consonants in Land Dayak (Bukar-Sadong). In In honour of Daniel Jones: Papers contributed on his eightieth birthday, 12 September 1961, ed. David Abercrombie et al., pp. 432–436. London: Longsmans
27. Smolensky, P. (1993) Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Paper presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1
28. Vance, T. (1982) ‘Canadian Raising’ in some dialects of the Northern United States. American Speech 62: 195–210