Housing for the aging population

European Review of Aging and Physical Activity

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 33-38

  Demirkan, Halime ^a  

^a BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Aging; Functional limitations; Physical accessibility; Universal design

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248349920     PISSN: 18137253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11556-007-0016-z     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. 2010 A Europe accessible for all. Available at: http://www.cca.lu/upload/ egafin.pdf
2. American National Standard Institute (1986) American national standard for buildings facilities providing accessibility and usability for physically handicapped people, ANSI A117.1, New York
3. Aslaksen F, Bergh S, Bringa, OR, Heggem, EK (1997) Universal design: planning and design for all. The Norwegian State Council on Disability, Oslo
4. Beecher V, Paquet V (2005) Survey instrument for universal design of consumer products, Appl Ergon 36:363-372
5. Bevan N (2001) International standards for HCI and usability. Int J Human-Comput Stud 55:533-552
6. Brink S (ed) (1998) Housing older people: an international perspective. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ
7. BSI 1979, BS 5810 Access for the disabled to buildings. British Standard Institution, London
8. Cavanagh S (1992) Designing housing for older women. Women's Design Service, London
9. Cavanagh S (1996) The space we need: principles of housing design for older women, women with children, and parent with disabilities. In: Komut E (ed) Housing question of the others'. Chamber of Architects Turkey, Ankara, pp 67-76
10. Carp FM (1976) Housing and living environments of older people. In: Bistock RH, Shanas E (eds) Handbook of ageing and the social sciences. D. Van Nostrand, New York, pp 244-271
11. Carp FM, Christensen DL (1986) Technical environmental assessment predictors of residential satisfaction. Res Aging 8:269-287
12. Center for Universal Design (1997) The principles of universal design, version 2.0. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
13. Cristopherson J (1997) Varieties of barrier free design: accessible housing in five European countries - a comparative study. Norwegian Building Research Institute, Oslo
14. Decree Ministerial (1989) Decreta Ministero Lavori Publia 14 Giugno 1989 no. 236
15. Demirbilek O, Demirkan, H (1997) A collaboration model in interiors involving the elderly. In: IEA'97, International Ergonomics Association 13th Triennial Congress, vol 5, Tampere, Finland, pp 570-572
16. Demirbilek O, Demirkan H (1998) Involving the elderly in the design process. Architectural Science Review 41:157-164
17. Demirbilek O, Demirkan, H (1999) Designing with the elderly. Fourth global conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, p 82
18. Demirbilek O, Demirkan H (2000) Collaborating with elderly endusers in design process. In: Scrivener SAR, Ball LJ, Woodcock A (eds) Collaborative design. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 205-212
19. Demirbilek O, Demirkan H (2004) Universal product design involving elderly users: a participatory design model. Appl Ergon 35:361-370
20. Demirbilek O, Demirkan H, Alyanak S (2000) Designing an armchair and a door with elderly users. In: Designing for the 21st Century, an international conference on universal design, http://www.adaptenv.org/21century/proceedings5. asp#parmchair, pp 1-3
21. Demirkan H (1991) Some criteria for designing interiors for the turkish disabled and elderly. In: 3rd Ergonomics Congress Proceedings, MPM, Ankara, pp 499-509
22. Demirkan H (1996) Adaptable house design. In Ural O, Altinbilek D, Birgönül T (eds) Proceedings of the XXIVth IAHS World Housing Congress, how to house a nation: the challenge for the XXIst century, "Middle East Technical University, Ankara, vol 1, pp 19-29
23. Demirkan H (1998) Integration of reasoning systems in architectural modelling activities. Autom Constr 7:229-236
24. Demirkan H (1999) Knowledge-based ergonomics model for the design of elderly residences. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-aided Ergonomics and Safety, Barcelona, Spain, http://www.ioc.upc.es/ CAES99
25. Demirkan H (2005) Generating design activities through sketches in multi-agent systems. Autom Constr 14:699-706
26. Demirkan H, Sagdic Y (1997) Bathing facilities for all Turkish people. In: IEA'97 International Ergonomics Association 13th Triennial Congress, vol 2, Tampere, Finland, pp 346-348
27. European Institute for Design and Disability (EIDD). http://www.design- for-all.org/
28. Ewart K (1995) Adaptable housing from the user's viewpoint. In: CNR-ICIE-SAIEDUE 2nd international seminar on potential of innovations technologies for solving housing problems of aged people
29. Fact sheet no. 6 (1991) Housing definitions: accessible, adaptable, and universal design. HDFS.4.91, pp 1-3
30. Fair Housing Act Design Manual (1996) Fair Housing Act Design Manual: a manual to assist designers and builders in meeting the accessibility requirements of the FHA, FHADM.3.99, barrier Free Environments, 295pp Available at: http://www.huduser.org/Publications/PDF/FAIRHOUSING/fairfull.pdf
31. Giuliani MV, Rullo G, Bove G (1990) Socializing and privacy space inside homes: an empirical study. Culture Space History 3:129-138
32. Goldsmith S (1976) Designing for the disabled, RIBA, London
33. Hasell MJ, Peatros F (1990) Exploring connections between women's changing roles and house form. Environ Behav 22:3-26
34. IASA demography: population by age groups, 1950-2050 for all European regions. Available at: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/ERD/DB/data/hum/dem/ dem_2.htm
35. Imamoglu EO, Imamoglu V (1995) Housing and living environments of the Turkish elderly. J Environ Psychol 12:35-43
36. Kaplan R (1985) Nature at the doorstep: residential satisfaction and the nearby environmental. J Archit Plann Res 2:115-127
37. Kaitilla S (1993) Satisfaction with public housing in Papua New Guinea: the case of West Taraka housing scheme. Environ Behav 25:514-545
38. Kennig B, Ryhl C (2002) Teaching universal design - global examples of projects and models for teaching in universal design at schools of design and architecture. AAoutlis, ANLH, Brussels
39. Lansey P (2001) Building research and the quality-of-life. Build Res Inf 29:62-74
40. Lawton MP (1985) Elderly in context: perspectives from environmental psychology and gerontology. Environ Behav 17:501-519
41. Lawton MP, Nahemow L (1973) Ecology and the ageing process: psychology of adult development and ageing. In: Eisdorfer C, Lawton M P (eds) Psychology of adult development and ageing. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 619-674
42. Leibrock C, Behar S (1993) Beautiful barrier-free. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
43. Mace RL (1998) Universal design in housing. Assist Technol 10:21-28
44. Mace RL, Bostrom JA, Harber LA, Young LC (1991) The accessible housing design file. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
45. Mace RL, Hardie GJ, Plaice JP (1991) Accessible environments: toward universal design. In Preiser W, Vischer J, White E (eds) Design interventions: toward a more human architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
46. Michelson W (1980) Longitudinal study of changing aspirations by introduction the dimension of time. Soc Issues 36:135-149
47. Morini A, Pomposini R (1996) New designs for aged people housing. In: Ural O, Altýnbilek D, Birgönül T (eds) XXIVth IAHS World Housing Congress, vol 2, pp 791-800
48. Ostroff E, Weisman LK (2004) Universal design building survey: incorporating the ADA and beyond in public facilities. Available at: http://www.udeducation.org/teach/course_mods/survey/index.asp
49. Parmelee PA, Lawton MP (1994) The design of special environments for the aged. In: Birren JE, Schaie K.W (eds) Handbook of the psychology of ageing. Academic, California, pp 464-488
50. Peloquin A (1994) Barrier-free residential environments, McGraw-Hill, New York
51. Pynoos J, Cohen E, David LJ, Berhardt S (1987) Home modifications: improvements that extend independence. In: Regnier V, Pynoos J (eds) Housing the aged. Elsevier, New York
52. Rapoport A (1985) Thinking about home environment: a conceptual framework. In: Altman L, Werner C (eds) Home environments. Plenum, New York, pp 255-286
53. Raschko BB (1982) Housing interiors for the disabled and elderly. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
54. Rent GS, Rent CS (1978) Low-income housing: factors related to residential satisfaction. Environ Behav 10:459-485
55. Resolution ResAP (2001) On the introduction of the principles of universal design into the curricula of all occupations working on the built environment, Council Of Europe, Committee of Ministers. Available at: http://cm.coe.int/ta/res/resAP/2001/2001xp1/htm
56. Sagdic Y, Demirkan H (1997) Different aspects of being elderly in residential wet spaces. In: IEA'97 International Ergonomics Association 13th Triennial Congress, vol 5, Tampere, Finland, pp 609-611
57. Sagdic Y, Demirkan H (2000) A design decision support system model for the wet space renovation of elderly people's residences. Architectural Science Review 43:125-132
58. Schwirian M (1993) Neighboring, residential satisfaction and psychological well-being in urban elders. J Commun Psychol 21:285-297
59. Steinfield E, Danford GS (1996) Automated doors: toward universal design. IDEA
60. Steinfield E, Shea S (1993) Enabling home environments: identifying barriers to independence. Technol Disabil 2(4):69-79
61. Story MF, Mueller JL, Mace RL (1998) The universal design file: designing for people of all ages and abilities, revised edition. North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design, Raleigh
62. Story MF, Mueller JL, Montoya-Weiss M (2001) Completion of universal design performance measures. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 2001 Annual Conference, RESNA, Arlington
63. Technology Foresight Panel on Health and Life Sciences (1995) Health and life sciences. HMSO, London
64. Tognoli J (1987) Residential environments. In: Stokols D, Altman I (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 55-690
65. Treffers B (2004) Design for all: a history of discrimination by design, future cities for all. Available at: http://www.eca.lu/upload/ History%20of%20Dicrimination%20by%20Design.pdf
66. Trost G (2005) State affairs in universal design. Fujitsu Sci Tech J 41:19-25
67. United Nations (1993) Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. A/RES/48/96. 85th plenary meeting 20 December 1993. Available at: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/48/a48r096.htm
68. United Nations (2001) World population prospects: the 2000 revision. United Nations, New York
69. Verderber S, Song JH (2005) Environment and aging in Japan - a review of recent research. Environ Behav 37:43-80