Three-dimensional lumbar spine postures measured by magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1242-1248

  Cargill, Sara C ^a   Pearcy, Mark ^a   Barry, Mark Darrell ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Lumbar; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pelvis; Positional; Registration; Spinal kinematics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE MOBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PELVIMETRY; POSTURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROTATION;

EID: 34248347417     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000263404.66369.a5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. van Dieen JH, de Looze MP. Sensitivity of single-equivalent trunk extensor muscle models to anatomical and functional assumptions. J Biomech 1999;32:195-8.
2. McGill SM. A revised anatomical model of the abdominal musculature for torso flexion efforts. J Biomech 1996;29:973-7.
3. Gatton ML, Pearcy MJ. Kinematics and movement sequencing during flexion of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1999;14:376-83.
4. Bridger RS, Orkin D, Henneberg M. A quantitative investigation of lumbar and pelvic postures in standing and sitting: Interrelationships with body position and hip muscle length. Int J Ind Ergon 1992;9:235-44.
5. Cao C, Hubbard R, Soutas-Little R. Kinematic study of thorax flexion and extension relative to pelvis for computer simulation of sitting. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Bioengineering Division, ed. Advances in Bioengineering. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1994:89-90.
6. Dolan P, Adams MA, Hutton WC. Commonly adopted postures and their effect on the lumbar spine. Spine 1988;13:197-201.
7. Robinson ME, O'Connor PD, Shirley FR, et al. Intrasubject reliability of spinal range of motion and velocity determined by video motion analysis. Phys Ther 1993;73:626-31.
8. Sullivan MS, Dickinson CE, Troup JD. The influence of age and gender on lumbar spine sagittal plane range of motion. A study of 1126 healthy Subjects. Spine 1994;19:682-6.
9. de Looze MP, Kingma I, Bussmann JBJ, et al. Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint moments in lifting. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1992;7:161-9.
10. Hoek van Dijke GA, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R, et al. A biomechanical model on muscle forces in the transfer of spinal load to the pelvis and legs. J Biomech 1999;32:927-33.
11. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, et al. Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1996;11:457-65.
12. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 1984;9:582-7.
13. Gatton ML. In: School of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Medical Engineering, ed. Mathematical Modelling of Muscle Recruitment and Function in the Lumbar Spine. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology; 2000:341.
14. Jorgensen MJ, Marras WS, Gupta P. Cross-sectional area of the lumbar back muscles as a function of torso flexion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:280-6.
15. Stokes IAF. Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity: A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine 1994;19:236-48.
16. Cheng PL, Pearcy M. A three-dimensional definition for the flexion/extension and abduction/adduction angles. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999;37:440-4.
17. Pearcy MJ. Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1985;212:1-45.